Menu Top



E-Contracts and Digital Law



Formation of E-Contracts

In the modern digital age, a significant number of transactions and agreements are concluded electronically, often over the internet. These are commonly referred to as Electronic Contracts or E-Contracts. An e-contract is essentially a contract formed in the electronic medium. The fundamental principles of contract law, as laid down in the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, Capacity, Free Consent, Lawful Object, etc.), apply equally to e-contracts. The challenge lies in applying these traditional principles to electronic interactions.


Applying Traditional Contract Principles to Electronic Commerce

The formation of an e-contract still requires a valid offer and acceptance, along with the other essential elements. The electronic environment provides new ways for these elements to be expressed and exchanged.

Offer in Electronic Commerce

In the context of e-commerce, displaying goods or services on a website with prices is generally considered an invitation to offer, not a binding offer. When a customer selects items and proceeds to the checkout, this is typically treated as the customer making an offer to buy those goods or services at the displayed price. The website's terms and conditions usually clarify this point.

Example: A product listing on Flipkart or Amazon is an invitation to offer. Adding a product to the cart and proceeding to payment is the customer's offer.

Acceptance in Electronic Commerce

Acceptance in e-commerce occurs when the seller signifies their assent to the buyer's offer. This acceptance can take various forms:

The key is that the acceptance must be communicated to the offeror (the buyer in this case). The Indian Contract Act's rules on communication of offer and acceptance (Sections 3, 4) apply. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) gives legal validity to electronic communication (discussed below).


Types of E-Contracts:

E-contracts can involve various parties and subject matters:

Regardless of the parties, the essential elements of a contract must be present, and the offer and acceptance must be traceable through electronic records and communications.


Example 1. Mr. Ganesh orders a book from an online store. After placing the order, he receives an automatic email confirming that the order has been received. Later, he receives another email stating that the book has been dispatched. When is the contract formed?

Answer:

The contract is likely formed when the online store sends the email confirming that the book has been dispatched. The initial automatic email confirming receipt of the order is typically treated as an acknowledgment of the buyer's offer, not an acceptance of the offer itself. The act of dispatching the goods or sending a confirmation that the order is accepted (like the dispatch email) is considered the seller's acceptance of Mr. Ganesh's offer. The terms and conditions of the online store would usually clarify the exact point of contract formation.



Legal Recognition of Electronic Records and Signatures

For e-contracts to be legally binding, the electronic forms of communication and authentication must be recognized by law. The Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) provides this legal framework in India.


Information Technology Act, 2000

The IT Act, 2000, amended various existing laws, including the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the Indian Penal Code, 1860, to provide legal recognition to electronic transactions. Key provisions relevant to e-contracts include:

Electronic Signature (as amended in 2008):

Section 2(1)(ta) defines "electronic signature" as "authentication of any electronic record by a subscriber by means of the procedure laid down in section 3A or section 3."

Section 3: Authentication of electronic records (original Digital Signature method).

Section 3A: Electronic Signature (added in 2008). It allows for authentication of electronic records using any electronic authentication technique specified in the Second Schedule of the Act. The Central Government has the power to add or omit any electronic authentication technique in the Second Schedule. The use of Electronic Signatures is valid if the technique is reliable and specified in the Schedule.

The IT Act thus provides a legal basis for treating electronic records as equivalent to paper documents and electronic signatures as equivalent to handwritten signatures for contractual purposes, thereby facilitating the formation and enforceability of e-contracts.


Exceptions under the IT Act (Section 1(4)):

Section 1(4) of the IT Act specifies certain documents and transactions to which the Act does not apply. These include:

This means that while ordinary commercial e-contracts are recognized, electronic records and electronic signatures are generally not sufficient for creating legally valid wills, trusts, powers of attorney, or contracts for the sale of immovable property. These transactions still typically require physical documents and traditional signatures/registration as per relevant laws (e.g., Registration Act, Transfer of Property Act).


Example 1. Mr. Eshan and Mr. Farhan enter into a contract for the sale of machinery via email. All the terms are agreed upon through email exchanges, and both parties express their agreement via email signature. Later, Mr. Farhan denies the existence of a valid contract, claiming email exchanges are not 'in writing' and email signatures are not legally valid. Is his claim correct?

Answer:

No, Mr. Farhan's claim is incorrect. According to Section 4 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, information in electronic form is legally recognized as equivalent to being 'in writing'. The email exchanges constitute electronic records. Furthermore, Section 5 (read with Section 3A) provides legal recognition to electronic signatures, including certain types of electronic authentication techniques. If the email signatures or the way their identity and assent are authenticated in the email exchanges meet the requirements of the IT Act, the contract formed through email is legally valid and enforceable. The contract is 'in writing' in electronic form, and the electronic signatures are legally valid.



Consumer Protection in E-Commerce

With the rise of e-commerce, consumers face new challenges, such as fraudulent websites, non-delivery of goods, delivery of defective or incorrect products, issues with refunds, and unfair terms and conditions. To address these issues and provide greater protection to online consumers, India has enacted specific provisions, notably under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.


Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (CPA 2019)

The CPA 2019 replaced the earlier Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and introduced several provisions relevant to e-commerce:


E-commerce Rules under CPA 2019

Based on the CPA 2019, the Central Government notified the **Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020**. These rules provide a dedicated framework for regulating e-commerce activities and protecting consumers. Key requirements for e-commerce entities (defined broadly to include e-commerce platforms, sellers on platforms, and inventory-based e-commerce entities) include:


Redressal Mechanism:

Consumers can file complaints regarding unfair trade practices or deficiency in services by e-commerce entities in the Consumer Forums (District, State, National Commission) established under the CPA 2019. The Act also provides for the establishment of the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to regulate matters relating to violation of consumer rights, unfair trade practices, and false or misleading advertisements, including in e-commerce.

These legal provisions aim to create a safer and more transparent environment for consumers engaging in online transactions, providing them with rights and avenues for redressal similar to traditional commerce.


Example 1. Mr. Gyan orders a specific mobile phone from an online platform and pays online. Upon delivery, he receives a different model of phone. The online platform refuses to accept return or provide refund, citing a 'no return, no refund' policy in their terms buried deep within their website. What rights does Mr. Gyan have?

Answer:

Mr. Gyan has significant rights as a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, and the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020. Delivering a different model of phone is likely a 'deficiency in service' and an 'unfair trade practice' (supplying goods not of the agreed quality/type). E-commerce entities are required to have clear return and refund policies, and cannot engage in unfair trade practices. Mr. Gyan can file a complaint against both the seller (if identifiable) and the online platform before the appropriate Consumer Forum (District, State, or National, depending on the value of goods/claim). He can seek refund of the price, replacement of the phone, and compensation for the inconvenience and loss suffered. A 'no return, no refund' policy is likely to be considered an unfair trade practice if it prevents return of defective or incorrect goods, contradicting the implied conditions under the Sale of Goods Act and consumer rights under CPA 2019. The online platform's failure to facilitate return and refund as per fair practice would also be a violation.



Consumer Contracts and Protection**



Unfair Contract Terms

In contracts between businesses and consumers (B2C contracts), there is often a significant imbalance in bargaining power. Businesses can draft standard form contracts (like terms and conditions, terms of service, etc.) that consumers are required to accept on a "take it or leave it" basis, often without the ability to negotiate the terms. This can lead to the inclusion of Unfair Contract Terms that are excessively one-sided and detrimental to consumers.


Meaning of Unfair Contract Terms

Unfair contract terms are terms and conditions in a contract that are unreasonably harsh, oppressive, or put the consumer at a significant disadvantage compared to the business. These terms often seek to limit the business's liability, impose excessive obligations on the consumer, or deny consumers basic rights and remedies.

While the Indian Contract Act, 1872, requires free consent, in standard form contracts, consent might be technically present (by clicking "I Agree" or signing), but the consumer may not have genuinely agreed to potentially hidden or complex unfair clauses. Courts have traditionally intervened to protect consumers from unfair terms based on principles of equity, public policy, or unconscionability, but there was no specific legislation solely targeting unfair terms in all consumer contracts.


Addressing Unfair Terms under Consumer Protection Act, 2019

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (CPA 2019) has, for the first time, explicitly introduced provisions to address unfair contract terms in consumer contracts. This is a significant step towards balancing the power between businesses and consumers.

Section 2(46) defines "unfair contract" as a contract between a manufacturer or trader or service provider on one hand, and a consumer on the other hand, having such terms which cause significant change in the rights and obligations of such consumer, as specified in Section 47.

Section 47(2) lists the types of terms that may be considered unfair contracts by the District Commission, State Commission, or National Commission. These include terms that:

Section 47(1) empowers the District Commission, State Commission, and National Commission to declare any terms of a contract, which it considers unfair, as null and void.

This means consumers can now directly challenge specific unfair clauses in a contract before the Consumer Forums, and the Forums have the power to strike down such terms, even if the rest of the contract remains valid.


Example 1. Mr. Naveen signs a contract for broadband service which contains a clause stating that the service provider can unilaterally terminate the contract at any time without giving any reason. After six months, the service provider terminates his service without cause. Can Mr. Naveen challenge this termination?

Answer:

Yes, Mr. Naveen can challenge this termination before the Consumer Forum. The clause allowing the service provider to unilaterally terminate the contract without reasonable cause is listed as a potential unfair contract term under Section 47(2)(d) of the CPA 2019. Mr. Naveen can file a complaint with the appropriate Consumer Forum (District, State, or National) alleging unfair contract term and deficiency in service due to wrongful termination. The Forum has the power to declare this unfair term null and void and order the service provider to restore the service or provide other appropriate relief (like compensation).



Protection under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

The CPA 2019 provides a broad framework for protecting consumers from various unfair practices and ensuring their rights are upheld. It defines key terms, outlines consumer rights, establishes regulatory authorities, and sets up a three-tier quasi-judicial redressal mechanism.


Key Aspects of Protection under CPA 2019:

The CPA 2019 significantly strengthened consumer protection by providing a dedicated legal framework, regulatory body, and accessible redressal mechanism, empowering consumers to challenge unfair practices and contracts in the marketplace, including in the digital space.


Example 1. Ms. Om purchases an air purifier online based on an advertisement that falsely claims it eliminates all viruses and bacteria. The product, upon testing, is found to be ineffective against most common viruses. What action can Ms. Om take under the CPA 2019?

Answer:

Ms. Om can take action under the CPA 2019. The false claim in the advertisement is a misleading advertisement and an unfair trade practice (Section 2(47)). Ms. Om has purchased goods based on this misleading information. She can file a complaint with the appropriate Consumer Forum (based on the price paid). The Forum can order the seller and/or the online platform to refund the price of the air purifier, replace it with a product that matches the claims (if available), and potentially award compensation for the loss or injury suffered. Additionally, the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) can take action against the seller and/or the advertiser for misleading advertisements and unfair trade practices, imposing penalties and directing discontinuation of such ads/practices.



Product Liability

A major reform introduced by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, is the concept of Product Liability. This makes manufacturers, service providers, and sellers (including those in e-commerce) liable for injury or damage caused to a consumer by a defective product or a deficiency in services related to the product.


Definition of Product Liability (Section 2(34))

Section 2(34):

"'product liability' means the responsibility of a product manufacturer or product seller, of any product or service, to compensate for any harm caused to a consumer by such defective product or deficiency in services, as the case may be;"

Explanation: This definition establishes the principle that entities in the supply chain are responsible for harm caused by the products they deal in.


Liability of Product Manufacturer (Section 84)

A product manufacturer is liable in a product liability action if:

The manufacturer is liable even if they were not negligent or fraudulent, provided the defect or failure caused harm.


Liability of Product Service Provider (Section 85)

A product service provider is liable in a product liability action if:


Liability of Product Seller (Section 86)

A product seller (which includes e-commerce entities selling through their platform) is liable in a product liability action if:

The seller is usually not liable if the manufacturer is identifiable and liable, but exceptions apply, particularly if the seller is also responsible for the defect or cannot identify the manufacturer (which is common in e-commerce marketplace models).


Harm (Section 2(22)):

Includes property damage, personal injury, mental agony, and consequential or incidental damage.


Procedure for Product Liability Action:

A consumer can file a complaint claiming product liability before the appropriate Consumer Forum. The complaint must specify the claim of product liability and the harm caused by the defective product or deficient service.

This introduction of product liability directly addresses the issue of faulty goods or services causing harm, making it easier for consumers to get compensation from parties in the supply chain, without necessarily having to prove negligence or fraud in complex ways.


Example 1. Mr. Prakash buys a pressure cooker from an online store. While using it according to the instructions, the cooker bursts due to a manufacturing defect, causing injury to Mr. Prakash and damage to his kitchen. What rights does Mr. Prakash have against the manufacturer and the online store under product liability?

Answer:

Mr. Prakash has a valid case for Product Liability under the CPA 2019. The pressure cooker is a product, and it caused harm (personal injury and property damage) due to a manufacturing defect. Mr. Prakash can file a product liability action against:

  • The Product Manufacturer: The manufacturer is liable because the product contained a manufacturing defect that caused harm (Section 84).
  • The Online Store (Product Seller): The online store (as a product seller, possibly through an e-commerce platform) can also be held liable under Section 86, particularly if it falls under one of the exceptions like failing to identify the manufacturer when required, or if the defect was apparent and they failed to exercise reasonable care in handling/inspecting the product (less likely for sealed products, but possible depending on facts and rules). However, if the manufacturer is clearly identified and liable, the primary liability might rest with the manufacturer, but the consumer can potentially sue both.

Mr. Prakash can claim compensation from the liable parties for his medical expenses, pain and suffering, damage to the kitchen, and other related losses. He can file this claim before the appropriate Consumer Forum.



Franchise Agreements and Licensing**



Legal Aspects of Franchise Agreements

A Franchise Agreement is a contractual arrangement in which one party (the franchisor) grants to another party (the franchisee) the right to use its trademark, brand name, business system, and operational procedures to sell a product or service. In return, the franchisee typically pays a fee (initial franchise fee and ongoing royalties) to the franchisor and agrees to operate the business according to the franchisor's standards and guidelines.

In India, there is no single, dedicated statute specifically governing franchise agreements. Franchise agreements are treated as commercial contracts and are primarily governed by the general principles of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. However, various other laws are also relevant to different aspects of a franchise relationship.


Nature of a Franchise Agreement

A franchise agreement is a complex contract that involves the licensing of intellectual property (trademarks, copyrights, patents, know-how), grant of rights to use a business system, and an ongoing relationship of support and control. It is not merely a contract for sale of goods or services, nor is it a partnership or agency in the traditional sense (though elements of agency might be present for specific purposes).

The franchisor is typically the owner of a successful business model, brand identity, and proprietary system. The franchisee invests capital and operates a local outlet of the franchised business, leveraging the franchisor's established brand and system to potentially reduce the risks associated with starting a new business from scratch.


Key Legal Aspects and Clauses in a Franchise Agreement:

A well-drafted franchise agreement addresses numerous legal and operational aspects:


Relevant Laws in India:

While no single law exists, franchise agreements are impacted by:

Legal issues often arise regarding disclosure requirements (lack of specific franchise disclosure law in India), termination rights, post-termination obligations, and the balance of power between franchisor and franchisee.


Example 1. Mr. Sharma wants to open a fast-food outlet using the brand name and system of a well-known national chain, "Tasty Bites". He signs a franchise agreement with Tasty Bites Pvt. Ltd., agreeing to pay an initial fee and monthly royalties, and to follow all their operational rules. Mr. Sharma invests Rs. 50 Lakhs in setting up the outlet as per Tasty Bites' specifications. A year later, Tasty Bites terminates the agreement, alleging minor deviations in Mr. Sharma's service procedures, leaving him with a significant investment in an outlet that can no longer use the brand. What legal framework governs this relationship?

Answer:

The relationship between Mr. Sharma (franchisee) and Tasty Bites Pvt. Ltd. (franchisor) is governed primarily by the specific Franchise Agreement they signed, subject to the general principles of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The validity, terms, performance, and termination of the agreement are assessed under contract law. The franchisee's investment and the termination clause would be evaluated based on whether the termination was valid as per the contract terms and principles of justice. Other relevant laws include the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (for use of the Tasty Bites brand), potentially the Competition Act, 2002 (if any clauses are anti-competitive), and potentially the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (in relation to the services provided to end consumers). In the absence of a specific franchise law, the courts would interpret the agreement based on general contract principles and the principles of equity, particularly when evaluating the fairness of termination clauses in light of the franchisee's investment.



Licensing Agreements and Intellectual Property

A Licensing Agreement is a contract under which the owner of intellectual property (IP) grants permission to another party to use their IP, under specific terms and conditions. The owner of the IP is called the Licensor, and the party receiving the permission to use is called the Licensee. The key aspect is that ownership of the IP remains with the Licensor; only the right to use is transferred, usually for a specified purpose, territory, and duration, in exchange for payment (royalty or license fee).


Intellectual Property (IP)

Intellectual Property refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, names, and images used in commerce. IP rights provide the creators or owners with certain exclusive rights over the use of their creations for a limited time. In India, IP is protected under various statutes:


Licensing Agreements and Intellectual Property

Licensing is a primary method for IP owners to commercialize their IP and generate revenue without having to exploit the IP themselves. A licensing agreement defines the scope of the permission granted and the obligations of both parties.

Key Clauses in a Licensing Agreement:


Relevant Laws in India:

IP licensing allows businesses to expand their reach, enter new markets, and generate revenue, while IP owners retain control over their valuable assets.


Example 1. "Alpha Software" owns the copyright in a popular accounting software. They enter into an agreement with "Beta Solutions", allowing Beta Solutions to distribute and sell licenses for the software to end customers in South India for a period of 5 years, in exchange for a percentage of revenue. What type of agreement is this, and what IP is involved?

Answer:

This is a Licensing Agreement. Specifically, it is a software license agreement. The IP involved is the Copyright in the accounting software, owned by Alpha Software (the Licensor). Alpha Software is granting a license (permission) to Beta Solutions (the Licensee) to use their copyright (specifically, the right to distribute and sub-license to end-users) within a defined scope (selling licenses), territory (South India), and term (5 years), in exchange for payment (percentage of revenue/royalties). Alpha Software retains ownership of the software's copyright. The agreement is governed by the terms they've agreed upon, subject to the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the Copyright Act, 1957.