Menu Top



Assessment under GST**



Self-Assessed Tax

Under GST, every registered taxpayer is required to assess their own tax liability and file returns accordingly. This process is known as self-assessment and is the basis of the GST compliance system.

Example:

ABC Traders files GSTR-3B for July and declares an output tax of ₹40,000. After adjusting ₹25,000 of ITC, they pay ₹15,000 in cash. This entire process reflects self-assessment under GST.



Provisional Assessment (Section 60)

When a registered person is unable to determine the value of goods/services or the tax rate applicable, they may request the proper officer for provisional assessment.

Example:

A manufacturer is unsure whether his product is taxed at 12% or 18%. He applies for provisional assessment and pays tax at a provisional rate of 12% until a final determination is made by the department.



Summary Assessment in Certain Special Cases (Section 64)

This type of assessment is done by the proper officer in special cases, where delay in assessment may adversely affect revenue. Summary assessment is done to protect government interest.

Example:

XYZ Ltd. is found to have evaded a huge amount of tax. The officer issues a summary assessment order immediately to recover the tax due, as waiting for normal procedure may result in revenue loss.



Scrutiny of Returns and Related Audit

Scrutiny of Returns

The proper officer may scrutinize the returns filed by the registered person to verify the correctness of details furnished.

Departmental Audit

As per Section 65 of the CGST Act, a departmental audit may be conducted by authorized officers to ensure compliance.

Example:

The GST department notices mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B filed by MNO Enterprises. The officer issues a notice for return scrutiny. MNO clarifies the issue and makes corrections in the next return.



Audit under GST**



Audit by Tax Authorities (Section 65)

Audit under Section 65 refers to the examination of records, returns, and other documents maintained or furnished by a registered person. The purpose is to verify the correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed, and ITC availed.

Example:

The GST officer selects XYZ Pvt. Ltd. for departmental audit. A notice is issued and audit begins at XYZ's premises after 15 days. During audit, discrepancies are found in ITC claimed, and a notice for explanation is sent.



Special Audit (Section 66)

When during any scrutiny, inquiry, or investigation, the officer believes that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within normal limits, he may direct for a special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant.

Example:

The Assistant Commissioner finds suspicious undervaluation of supply in M/s Alpha Tech’s returns. He orders a special audit by a CMA. The audit reveals misclassification and underpayment of GST, and further proceedings are initiated.



Audit by the Taxpayer (GSTR-9C)

As per earlier GST provisions, taxpayers whose aggregate turnover exceeded a specified limit were required to get their accounts audited by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant and submit a reconciliation statement in Form GSTR-9C.

Example:

M/s Beta Traders had a turnover of ₹3.5 crore in FY 2020–21. They were required to file GSTR-9 and get their accounts audited by a Chartered Accountant, who also filed GSTR-9C.



Offences and Penalties under GST**



Penalty for Certain Offences (Section 122)

Section 122 of the CGST Act lays down penalties for specified offences committed by a taxable person. These offences can attract a fixed monetary penalty or a penalty equal to the tax evaded.

Improper use of ITC

Failure to issue invoices

Wrongful availment of refund

Supplying goods/services without registration

Example:

M/s ABC & Co. claimed ₹2,50,000 as ITC without receiving the goods. The GST officer detects this and imposes a penalty of ₹2,50,000 under Section 122.



Prosecution for Certain Offences (Section 132)

Section 132 provides for prosecution in cases involving serious tax offences such as fraud, suppression of supply, falsification of documents, or obstruction of officials.

Example:

Mr. X creates fake invoices and avails ITC of ₹7 crore fraudulently. He is liable for prosecution and can face imprisonment up to 5 years under Section 132.



Compounding of Offences (Section 138)

Compounding allows the accused to avoid litigation by paying a compounding fee. It is a way to settle offences without undergoing a full legal process.

Example:

M/s Shine Ltd. was found guilty of evading ₹2 lakh GST. The firm applies for compounding and pays ₹2.5 lakh as compounding fee. No further prosecution takes place.