Applied Mathematics for Class 11th & 12th (Concepts and Questions) | ||
---|---|---|
11th | Concepts | Questions |
12th | Concepts | Questions |
Chapter 1 Numbers, Quantification and Numerical Applications (Concepts)
Welcome to this pivotal chapter page, designed as a crucial consolidation and extension of fundamental numerical concepts and quantification techniques within Applied Mathematics. Moving beyond initial introductions, this section delves deeper into the practical power and application of these tools, aiming to equip you with the advanced problem-solving skills necessary across diverse applied fields. We revisit core ideas like modulo arithmetic and logarithms with increased sophistication and explore a variety of real-world numerical applications demanding strong logical reasoning and quantitative aptitude. The focus shifts from learning individual techniques to integrating them effectively, preparing you for complex analytical challenges encountered in competitive examinations and professional settings.
One key area revisited with enhanced depth is modulo arithmetic. We move beyond basic remainder calculations to explore the properties of congruence relations ($a \equiv b \pmod m$) more formally. This may involve solving linear congruences of the form $ax \equiv b \pmod m$, understanding concepts like modular inverses, and appreciating the wide-ranging applications of this system in areas such as check digit verification schemes (like ISBN or UPC codes which help detect errors), scheduling algorithms, computer science operations (hashing, data structures), and even foundational concepts in modern cryptography. Proficiency in modular thinking allows for the elegant analysis of cyclical patterns and discrete systems.
Similarly, the properties and applications of logarithms and antilogarithms are reinforced and extended. The fundamental laws – $\log(mn) = \log m + \log n$, $\log(\frac{m}{n}) = \log m - \log n$, $\log(m^n) = n \log m$ – and the change of base formula ($\log_b a = \frac{\log_c a}{\log_c b}$) are applied to simplify more complex calculations and potentially solve logarithmic equations. Their role in modeling real-world phenomena involving exponential growth or decay (e.g., population dynamics, compound interest indirectly, radioactive decay) is emphasized. Furthermore, the importance of logarithmic scales in scientific measurements, such as the Richter scale for earthquake intensity, decibels for sound intensity, or pH values for acidity, is highlighted to illustrate how logarithms effectively compress wide ranges of values into manageable scales.
A significant portion of this consolidating chapter is dedicated to enhancing numerical problem-solving skills through diverse quantitative aptitude applications. This involves tackling more advanced problems in areas such as:
- Time, Speed, and Distance: Moving beyond basic calculations to scenarios involving relative motion. This includes problems related to boats and streams, calculating effective speeds upstream ($u-v$) and downstream ($u+v$), and finding the speed of the boat ($u$) or stream ($v$). Race scenarios involving head starts or relative speeds on circular tracks may also be explored.
- Work-Rate Problems: Typically addressed through 'Pipes and Cisterns' scenarios. These problems involve calculating the combined rate of work when multiple entities (pipes) work together or in opposition (filling vs. emptying a tank), often requiring manipulation of work rates (where Rate = $\frac{1}{\text{Time}}$).
- Ratio, Proportion, and Partnerships: Applying ratio concepts to solve partnership problems, where profits (potentially in $\textsf{₹}$) are typically distributed based on the ratio of (Investment Amount $\times$ Duration of Investment) for each partner.
- Mixtures and Alligation: Using principles of weighted averages or the rule of alligation to solve problems involving the mixing of ingredients with different costs or concentrations to achieve a desired mixture characteristic.
This chapter effectively integrates previously learned concepts like averages, percentages, and algebraic modeling within these specific application contexts, aiming to significantly sharpen your analytical and numerical problem-solving capabilities for a wide array of practical and competitive challenges.
Modulo Arithmetic
Modulo Arithmetic is a system of arithmetic for integers, often referred to as "clock arithmetic". In this system, numbers "wrap around" upon reaching a certain value called the modulus. This concept is fundamental in various areas, including number theory, computer science (especially in cryptography, hashing, and error detection codes), and even in everyday time calculations (like determining the hour on a clock).
At its core, modulo arithmetic is concerned with remainders obtained from integer division.
The Modulo Operator
The modulo operation, denoted by $a \pmod{m}$, calculates the remainder when an integer $a$ (the dividend) is divided by a positive integer $m$ (the modulus).
For any integer $a$ and any positive integer $m$, the process of integer division states that there exist unique integers $q$ (the quotient) and $r$ (the remainder) such that:
$\text{a} = \text{qm} + \text{r}$
... (i)
and the remainder $r$ must satisfy the condition:
$\text{0} \leq \text{r} < \text{m}$
... (ii)
The result of the modulo operation $a \pmod m$ is this unique remainder $r$.
In simpler terms, to find $a \pmod m$, you divide $a$ by $m$, and the result is the remainder, ensuring that the remainder is never negative and always less than the modulus $m$.
Examples of Modulo Calculation
Example 1. Find $10 \pmod{3}$.
Answer:
We need to find the remainder when 10 is divided by 3.
Using long division or by inspection:
$\begin{array}{r} 3 \\ 3{\overline{\smash{\big)}\,10}} \\ \underline{-~\phantom{(}9} \\ 1 \end{array}$
[Division of 10 by 3]
The quotient $q=3$ and the remainder $r=1$.
Check the formal definition $a = qm + r$ and $0 \leq r < m$:
$10 = 3 \times 3 + 1$
(a=10, m=3, q=3, r=1)
$0 \leq 1 < 3$
(Remainder is valid)
So, $10 \pmod{3} = 1$
Example 2. Find $15 \pmod{5}$.
Answer:
We need to find the remainder when 15 is divided by 5.
$\begin{array}{r} 3 \\ 5{\overline{\smash{\big)}\,15}} \\ \underline{-~\phantom{(}15} \\ 0 \end{array}$
[Division of 15 by 5]
The quotient $q=3$ and the remainder $r=0$.
Check the formal definition:
$15 = 3 \times 5 + 0$
(a=15, m=5, q=3, r=0)
$0 \leq 0 < 5$
(Remainder is valid)
So, $15 \pmod{5} = 0$
When a number is perfectly divisible by the modulus, the remainder is 0.
Example 3. Find $-7 \pmod{4}$.
Answer:
We need to find integers $q$ and $r$ such that $-7 = q \times 4 + r$ and $0 \leq r < 4$.
Let's try dividing -7 by 4: $-7 / 4 = -1.75$.
According to the definition, the quotient $q$ is the greatest integer less than or equal to $a/m$. Here, $a/m = -1.75$. The greatest integer less than or equal to $-1.75$ is $-2$. So, $q = -2$.
Now, substitute $a=-7$, $m=4$, and $q=-2$ into the equation $a = qm + r$:
$-7 = (-2) \times 4 + r$
(Substitute values)
$-7 = -8 + r$
Solve for $r$:
$\text{r} = -7 + 8 = 1$
[Remainder]
Check if the remainder $r=1$ satisfies $0 \leq r < m$: $0 \leq 1 < 4$. Yes, it does.
So, $-7 \pmod{4} = 1$
Note: Some programming languages might give a negative result for $a \% m$ if $a$ is negative. However, the standard mathematical definition of $a \pmod m$ requires the remainder to be non-negative.
Properties of Modulo Arithmetic
Modulo arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication) behave in a way that makes calculations simpler, especially with large numbers. The key principle is that if you replace a number with its remainder modulo $m$, the result of the operation modulo $m$ remains the same.
Let $a$ and $b$ be any integers, and $m$ be a positive integer. Let $a_m = a \pmod m$ and $b_m = b \pmod m$ be their respective remainders when divided by $m$.
1. Addition Property:
The sum of two integers modulo $m$ is equivalent to the sum of their remainders modulo $m$.
$(a + b) \pmod m = (a_m + b_m) \pmod m$
Derivation:
By the definition of modulo, $a = q_a m + a_m$ and $b = q_b m + b_m$ for some integers $q_a, q_b$, where $0 \leq a_m, b_m < m$.
Adding $a$ and $b$:
$\text{a} + b = (q_a m + a_m) + (q_b m + b_m)$
$= q_a m + q_b m + a_m + b_m$
$= (q_a + q_b) m + (a_m + b_m)$
Let $Q = q_a + q_b$. This is an integer. So, $a + b = Qm + (a_m + b_m)$.
This equation shows that when $(a+b)$ is divided by $m$, the remainder is the same as the remainder when $(a_m + b_m)$ is divided by $m$.
$(a + b) \pmod m = (a_m + b_m) \pmod m$
... (iii)
2. Subtraction Property:
The difference of two integers modulo $m$ is equivalent to the difference of their remainders modulo $m$.
$(a - b) \pmod m = (a_m - b_m) \pmod m$
Derivation:
Using $a = q_a m + a_m$ and $b = q_b m + b_m$:
Subtracting $b$ from $a$:
$\text{a} - b = (q_a m + a_m) - (q_b m + b_m)$
$= q_a m - q_b m + a_m - b_m$
$= (q_a - q_b) m + (a_m - b_m)$
Let $Q = q_a - q_b$. This is an integer. So, $a - b = Qm + (a_m - b_m)$.
This equation shows that when $(a-b)$ is divided by $m$, the remainder is the same as the remainder when $(a_m - b_m)$ is divided by $m$.
$(a - b) \pmod m = (a_m - b_m) \pmod m$
... (iv)
3. Multiplication Property:
The product of two integers modulo $m$ is equivalent to the product of their remainders modulo $m$.
$(a \times b) \pmod m = (a_m \times b_m) \pmod m$
Derivation:
Using $a = q_a m + a_m$ and $b = q_b m + b_m$:
Multiplying $a$ and $b$:
$\text{a} \times b = (q_a m + a_m) \times (q_b m + b_m)$
$= q_a m (q_b m + b_m) + a_m (q_b m + b_m)$
$= q_a q_b m^2 + q_a b_m m + a_m q_b m + a_m b_m$
$= m (q_a q_b m + q_a b_m + a_m q_b) + a_m b_m$
Let $Q = q_a q_b m + q_a b_m + a_m q_b$. This is an integer. So, $a \times b = Qm + a_m b_m$.
This equation shows that when $(a \times b)$ is divided by $m$, the remainder is the same as the remainder when $(a_m \times b_m)$ is divided by $m$.
$(a \times b) \pmod m = (a_m \times b_m) \pmod m$
... (v)
4. Exponentiation Property:
For any integer $a$, a positive integer $m$, and a non-negative integer $k$, the property for exponentiation modulo $m$ is:
$\text{a}^k \pmod m = (a \pmod m)^k \pmod m$
This means you can take the modulo before raising to the power. This property is particularly useful for calculating powers of large numbers modulo $m$ without having to compute the large power first. You can repeatedly apply the multiplication property.
Example: Find $7^{10} \pmod{5}$.
Calculating $7^{10}$ is $282475249$. $282475249 \pmod 5 = 4$ (since the last digit is 9, and $9 \pmod 5 = 4$).
Using the property: We can calculate $7 \pmod 5$ first.
$7 \pmod 5 = 2$
So, $7^{10} \pmod 5 = (7 \pmod 5)^{10} \pmod 5 = 2^{10} \pmod 5$.
Now we calculate powers of 2 modulo 5:
$\text{2}^1 \pmod 5 = 2$
$\text{2}^2 \pmod 5 = 4$
$\text{2}^3 \pmod 5 = 8 \pmod 5 = 3$
$\text{2}^4 \pmod 5 = 16 \pmod 5 = 1$
$\text{2}^5 \pmod 5 = (2^4 \times 2^1) \pmod 5 = (1 \times 2) \pmod 5 = 2$
The remainders repeat in a cycle of length 4: 2, 4, 3, 1.
To find $2^{10} \pmod 5$, we look at the exponent 10. The position in the cycle is $10 \pmod 4 = 2$. The second value in the cycle is 4.
$\text{2}^{10} \pmod 5 = 4$
Thus, $7^{10} \pmod 5 = 4$. This method avoids calculating the large number $7^{10}$.
Example 4. Find $(125 + 347) \pmod{10}$.
Answer:
We need to find the remainder of the sum $125 + 347$ when divided by 10.
Using the Addition Property: $(a + b) \pmod m = (a \pmod m + b \pmod m) \pmod m$.
First, find the remainders of 125 and 347 when divided by 10:
$125 \pmod{10}$: $125 = 12 \times 10 + 5$. Remainder is 5. $125 \pmod{10} = 5$.
$347 \pmod{10}$: $347 = 34 \times 10 + 7$. Remainder is 7. $347 \pmod{10} = 7$.
Now, add the remainders and find the modulo 10:
$(125 + 347) \pmod{10} = (5 + 7) \pmod{10}$
$= 12 \pmod{10}$
Find the remainder of 12 when divided by 10: $12 = 1 \times 10 + 2$. Remainder is 2.
$= 2$
[Final Remainder]
The result is 2. This method is particularly useful when dealing with very large numbers that are difficult to sum directly. Note that finding the modulo 10 of a positive integer simply gives its last digit.
Congruence Modulo
Building upon the concept of modulo arithmetic, Congruence Modulo m provides a formal way to describe the relationship between two integers that have the same remainder when divided by a specific positive integer $m$. This idea is foundational in number theory and has numerous applications in fields where patterns repeat cyclically.
Definition of Congruence Modulo m
Two integers $a$ and $b$ are said to be congruent modulo m, where $m$ is a positive integer (called the modulus), if they have the same remainder when divided by $m$.
Mathematically, this relationship is denoted as:
$\text{a} \equiv b \pmod{\text{m}}$
... (i)
This notation is read as "$a$ is congruent to $b$ modulo $m$".
An equivalent and often more useful definition of congruence modulo $m$ is that $a$ and $b$ are congruent modulo $m$ if and only if their difference, $(a - b)$, is divisible by $m$.
$\text{a} \equiv b \pmod{\text{m}} \iff m \mid (a - b)$
... (ii)
Here, $m \mid (a - b)$ means that $(a - b)$ is a multiple of $m$, i.e., $a - b = k \times m$ for some integer $k$.
Equivalence of the Definitions:
Let's show that the two definitions are equivalent:
Part 1: If $a \equiv b \pmod m$ (same remainder), then $m \mid (a - b)$.
If $a$ and $b$ have the same remainder $r$ when divided by $m$, then by the definition of the modulo operation (Formula (i) from the previous section on Modulo Arithmetic), we can write:
$\text{a} = q_1 m + r$
(for some integer $q_1$, $0 \leq r < m$)
$\text{b} = q_2 m + r$
(for some integer $q_2$, $0 \leq r < m$)
Subtracting the second equation from the first:
$\text{a} - b = (q_1 m + r) - (q_2 m + r)$
$\text{a} - b = q_1 m - q_2 m + r - r$
$\text{a} - b = (q_1 - q_2) m$
Since $q_1$ and $q_2$ are integers, $q_1 - q_2$ is also an integer. Let $k = q_1 - q_2$.
$\text{a} - b = km$
This means that $a - b$ is a multiple of $m$, which is the definition of $m \mid (a - b)$.
Part 2: If $m \mid (a - b)$, then $a \equiv b \pmod m$ (same remainder).
If $m \mid (a - b)$, then $a - b = km$ for some integer $k$. This can be written as $a = b + km$.
Let the remainder when $b$ is divided by $m$ be $r_b$. So, $b = q_b m + r_b$, where $0 \leq r_b < m$.
Substitute this expression for $b$ into the equation for $a$:
$\text{a} = (q_b m + r_b) + km$
$\text{a} = q_b m + km + r_b$
$\text{a} = (q_b + k) m + r_b$
Let $Q = q_b + k$. This is an integer. So, $a = Qm + r_b$.
Since $0 \leq r_b < m$, by the uniqueness of the remainder in integer division, $r_b$ is the remainder when $a$ is divided by $m$.
Thus, $a$ and $b$ have the same remainder $r_b$ when divided by $m$. By definition, $a \equiv b \pmod m$.
The two definitions are equivalent.
Relationship with the Modulo Operation
The definition of congruence modulo $m$ is directly related to the result of the modulo operation.
$a \equiv b \pmod m$ if and only if $a \pmod m = b \pmod m$.
This is simply restating the first definition using the result of the modulo operation.
Example: $17 \pmod 5 = 2$ and $12 \pmod 5 = 2$. Since their remainders are the same, $17 \equiv 12 \pmod 5$.
Let's check using the difference definition: $17 - 12 = 5$. Is 5 divisible by 5? Yes, $5 = 1 \times 5$. So, $5 \mid (17 - 12)$, confirming $17 \equiv 12 \pmod 5$.
Properties of Congruence Modulo m
Congruence modulo $m$ defines a relationship between integers. This relationship is an equivalence relation on the set of integers, meaning it satisfies the following three properties for any integers $a, b, c$ and a positive integer $m$:
1. Reflexive Property:
Any integer $a$ is congruent to itself modulo $m$.
$\text{a} \equiv a \pmod{\text{m}}$
This is true because $a - a = 0$. Since $m > 0$, $0$ is divisible by $m$ ($0 = 0 \times m$). By the definition $m \mid (a-b)$, we have $m \mid (a-a)$, so $a \equiv a \pmod m$.
2. Symmetric Property:
If $a$ is congruent to $b$ modulo $m$, then $b$ is congruent to $a$ modulo $m$.
If $a \equiv b \pmod{\text{m}}$, then $b \equiv a \pmod{\text{m}}$.
Proof:
Given: $a \equiv b \pmod m$
To Prove: $b \equiv a \pmod m$
Proof:
By the definition of congruence (using the difference property, Formula (ii)), $a \equiv b \pmod m$ means that $m$ divides the difference $(a - b)$.
$\text{m} \mid (a - b)$
[Given]
This means that $(a - b)$ is an integer multiple of $m$. So, there exists an integer $k$ such that:
$\text{a} - b = km$
Multiply both sides of this equation by $-1$:
$-(a - b) = -km$
$\text{b} - a = (-k)m$
Since $k$ is an integer, $-k$ is also an integer. Let $k' = -k$. Then $b - a = k'm$.
This shows that $(b - a)$ is an integer multiple of $m$, which means $m$ divides $(b - a)$.
$\text{m} \mid (b - a)$
By the definition of congruence (Formula (ii)), $m \mid (b - a)$ means $b \equiv a \pmod m$.
$\text{b} \equiv a \pmod{\text{m}}$
[Proved]
3. Transitive Property:
If $a$ is congruent to $b$ modulo $m$, and $b$ is congruent to $c$ modulo $m$, then $a$ is congruent to $c$ modulo $m$.
If $a \equiv b \pmod{\text{m}}$ and $b \equiv c \pmod{\text{m}}$, then $a \equiv c \pmod{\text{m}}$.
Proof:
Given: $a \equiv b \pmod m$ and $b \equiv c \pmod m$
To Prove: $a \equiv c \pmod m$
Proof:
By the definition of congruence (Formula (ii)), $a \equiv b \pmod m$ means $m$ divides $(a - b)$, and $b \equiv c \pmod m$ means $m$ divides $(b - c)$.
This means that $(a - b)$ and $(b - c)$ are integer multiples of $m$. So, there exist integers $k_1$ and $k_2$ such that:
$\text{a} - b = k_1m$
$\text{b} - c = k_2m$
Now, consider the difference $(a - c)$. We can rewrite it using $b$:
$\text{a} - c = (a - b) + (b - c)$
Substitute the expressions for $(a - b)$ and $(b - c)$ from our given information:
$\text{a} - c = k_1m + k_2m$
$\text{a} - c = (k_1 + k_2)m$
Since $k_1$ and $k_2$ are integers, their sum $(k_1 + k_2)$ is also an integer. Let $k = k_1 + k_2$. Then $a - c = km$.
This shows that $(a - c)$ is an integer multiple of $m$, which means $m$ divides $(a - c)$.
$\text{m} \mid (a - c)$
By the definition of congruence (Formula (ii)), $m \mid (a - c)$ means $a \equiv c \pmod m$.
$\text{a} \equiv c \pmod{\text{m}}$
[Proved]
Since congruence modulo $m$ is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, it partitions the set of integers into disjoint equivalence classes. Each class consists of all integers that have the same remainder when divided by $m$.
Arithmetic Properties of Congruences
Congruences behave well with respect to addition, subtraction, and multiplication. These properties are direct consequences of the properties of the modulo operator discussed in the previous section.
If $a, b, c, d$ are integers and $m$ is a positive integer such that $a \equiv b \pmod m$ and $c \equiv d \pmod m$, then:
1. Addition Property:
The sum of congruent numbers is congruent modulo $m$.
$\text{a} + c \equiv b + d \pmod{\text{m}}$
This follows from $(a+c) \pmod m = ((a \pmod m) + (c \pmod m)) \pmod m$ and $(b+d) \pmod m = ((b \pmod m) + (d \pmod m)) \pmod m$. Since $a \pmod m = b \pmod m$ and $c \pmod m = d \pmod m$, their sums modulo $m$ will be the same.
2. Subtraction Property:
The difference of congruent numbers is congruent modulo $m$.
$\text{a} - c \equiv b - d \pmod{\text{m}}$
This follows similarly from the subtraction property of the modulo operator.
3. Multiplication Property:
The product of congruent numbers is congruent modulo $m$.
$\text{ac} \equiv bd \pmod{\text{m}}$
Proof (using the difference definition):
Given: $a \equiv b \pmod m$ and $c \equiv d \pmod m$
To Prove: $ac \equiv bd \pmod m$
Proof:
Given $a \equiv b \pmod m$ and $c \equiv d \pmod m$.
By definition (Formula (ii)), $a - b = k_1 m$ and $c - d = k_2 m$ for some integers $k_1, k_2$.
We can write $a = b + k_1 m$ and $c = d + k_2 m$.
Consider the product $ac$:
$\text{ac} = (b + k_1 m)(d + k_2 m)$
$\text{ac} = bd + b(k_2 m) + (k_1 m)d + (k_1 m)(k_2 m)$
$\text{ac} = bd + bk_2 m + dk_1 m + k_1k_2 m^2$
Rearrange the terms to isolate $ac - bd$:
$\text{ac} - bd = bk_2 m + dk_1 m + k_1k_2 m^2$
Factor out $m$ from the terms on the right side:
$\text{ac} - bd = m (bk_2 + dk_1 + k_1k_2 m)$
Since $b, k_2, d, k_1,$ and $m$ are integers, the expression inside the parenthesis $(bk_2 + dk_1 + k_1k_2 m)$ is an integer. Let $K = bk_2 + dk_1 + k_1k_2 m$.
$\text{ac} - bd = Km$
This shows that the difference $(ac - bd)$ is an integer multiple of $m$, which means $m$ divides $(ac - bd)$.
$\text{m} \mid (ac - bd)$
By the definition of congruence (Formula (ii)), this implies $ac \equiv bd \pmod m$.
$\text{ac} \equiv bd \pmod{\text{m}}$
[Proved]
4. Exponentiation Property:
If $a$ is congruent to $b$ modulo $m$, then $a$ raised to the power of any positive integer $k$ is congruent to $b$ raised to the power of the same integer $k$, modulo $m$.
If $a \equiv b \pmod{\text{m}}$, then $a^k \equiv b^k \pmod{\text{m}}$ for any positive integer $k$.
This property can be formally proven using mathematical induction, based on the multiplication property.
Base case ($k=1$): $a^1 \equiv b^1 \pmod m$, which is $a \equiv b \pmod m$. This is given.
Inductive step: Assume $a^k \equiv b^k \pmod m$ is true for some positive integer $k$. We need to show $a^{k+1} \equiv b^{k+1} \pmod m$.
We know $a \equiv b \pmod m$ (given) and $a^k \equiv b^k \pmod m$ (inductive hypothesis).
Using the Multiplication Property with $(a, b)$ and $(a^k, b^k)$, we have $a \cdot a^k \equiv b \cdot b^k \pmod m$.
This simplifies to $a^{k+1} \equiv b^{k+1} \pmod m$.
By the principle of mathematical induction, the property holds for all positive integers $k$.
Examples Using Congruence Properties
Example 1. Determine if $27 \equiv 3 \pmod{6}$.
Answer:
We can use either definition of congruence modulo 6.
Method 1: Using the remainder definition ($a \pmod m = b \pmod m$):
Find the remainder when 27 is divided by 6:
$\text{27} = 4 \times 6 + 3$. So, $27 \pmod 6 = 3$.
Find the remainder when 3 is divided by 6:
$\text{3} = 0 \times 6 + 3$. So, $3 \pmod 6 = 3$.
Since the remainders are the same ($3 = 3$), $27$ is congruent to $3$ modulo $6$.
Thus, $27 \equiv 3 \pmod{6}$ is True.
Method 2: Using the difference definition ($m \mid (a - b)$):
Check if the difference $(27 - 3)$ is divisible by the modulus $m=6$.
$\text{a} - b = 27 - 3 = 24$
Is 24 divisible by 6? Yes, $24 = 4 \times 6$.
$\text{6} \mid 24$
Since 6 divides the difference $(27 - 3)$, $27$ is congruent to $3$ modulo $6$.
Thus, $27 \equiv 3 \pmod{6}$ is True.
Example 2. Find the remainder when $2^{100}$ is divided by 7.
Answer:
We need to find the value of $2^{100} \pmod{7}$.
We can use the properties of congruence and the exponentiation property. Let's find the remainders of the first few powers of 2 when divided by 7:
$\text{2}^1 \equiv 2 \pmod{7}$
$\text{2}^2 \equiv 4 \pmod{7}$
$\text{2}^3 \equiv 8 \pmod{7}$
Since $8 = 1 \times 7 + 1$, the remainder of 8 divided by 7 is 1.
$\text{2}^3 \equiv 1 \pmod{7}$
[Key Congruence]
This congruence $2^3 \equiv 1 \pmod 7$ is very useful because powers of 1 are easy to work with.
We need to find $2^{100} \pmod 7$. Let's write the exponent 100 in terms of the power that gives remainder 1, which is 3.
Divide 100 by 3: $100 = 3 \times 33 + 1$.
So, we can write $2^{100}$ as $2^{3 \times 33 + 1} = (2^3)^{33} \times 2^1$.
Now, using the Exponentiation Property $a^k \equiv b^k \pmod m$ if $a \equiv b \pmod m$:
Since $2^3 \equiv 1 \pmod 7$, raising both sides to the power of 33:
$(2^3)^{33} \equiv 1^{33} \pmod{7}$
[Applying Exponentiation Property]
$\text{2}^{99} \equiv 1 \pmod{7}$
[Since $1^{33} = 1$]
Now we have $2^{99} \equiv 1 \pmod 7$. We need $2^{100}$. We can write $2^{100} = 2^{99} \times 2^1$.
We also know $2^1 \equiv 2 \pmod 7$.
Using the Multiplication Property $ac \equiv bd \pmod m$ if $a \equiv b \pmod m$ and $c \equiv d \pmod m$. Let $a = 2^{99}$, $b = 1$, $c = 2^1$, $d = 2$, and $m = 7$.
$\text{2}^{99} \times 2^1 \equiv 1 \times 2 \pmod{7}$
[Applying Multiplication Property]
$\text{2}^{100} \equiv 2 \pmod{7}$
[Simplifying]
The congruence $2^{100} \equiv 2 \pmod 7$ means that when $2^{100}$ is divided by 7, the remainder is 2.
The remainder when $2^{100}$ is divided by 7 is 2.
Alligation and Mixture
In Applied Mathematics, problems involving the mixing of two or more substances with different properties (like price, concentration, density, etc.) to produce a mixture with a desired average property are commonly encountered. Alligation is a technique or rule that helps solve a specific type of mixture problem, particularly useful for finding the ratio in which two ingredients with known prices or concentrations should be mixed to obtain a mixture of a desired mean price or concentration. The term Mixture refers to the result of combining two or more distinct ingredients.
The Rule of Alligation
The Rule of Alligation provides a quick method to determine the ratio of the quantities of two ingredients that need to be mixed to obtain a mixture with a specific mean value of a property (like cost per unit, percentage concentration, etc.).
Suppose we have two ingredients:
- Ingredient 1: A cheaper ingredient with cost (or value of property) $C_1$ per unit.
- Ingredient 2: A dearer ingredient with cost (or value of property) $C_2$ per unit.
We want to mix these two ingredients to form a mixture with a mean cost (or value of property) $C_m$ per unit. It is always assumed that $C_1 < C_m < C_2$.
The rule of alligation states that the ratio of the quantity of the cheaper ingredient to the quantity of the dearer ingredient in the mixture is given by the ratio of the absolute differences between the mean value and the individual values, taken diagonally:
$\frac{\text{Quantity of Cheaper Ingredient}}{\text{Quantity of Dearer Ingredient}} = \frac{\text{Value of Dearer} - \text{Mean Value}}{\text{Mean Value} - \text{Value of Cheaper}}$
$\frac{\text{Quantity of Ingredient 1}}{\text{Quantity of Ingredient 2}} = \frac{C_2 - C_m}{C_m - C_1}$
... (i)
This rule is often visualized using the "alligation cross" or "alligation diagram":
Ingredient 1 (Cheaper) | Mean Value ($C_m$) | Difference 1 | ||
Value | $C_1$ | $C_2 - C_m$ | (Quantity of Cheaper) | |
Ingredient 2 (Dearer) | Difference 2 | |||
Value | $C_2$ | $C_m - C_1$ | (Quantity of Dearer) |
The values $(C_2 - C_m)$ and $(C_m - C_1)$ represent the parts of the cheaper and dearer ingredients, respectively, in the ratio of mixing. The value $(C_2 - C_m)$ is placed diagonally opposite to $C_1$, and $(C_m - C_1)$ is placed diagonally opposite to $C_2$.
This rule is based on the principle of weighted averages.
Derivation of the Rule of Alligation
Let $Q_1$ be the quantity of the cheaper ingredient (with value $C_1$) and $Q_2$ be the quantity of the dearer ingredient (with value $C_2$).
When these quantities are mixed, the total quantity of the mixture is $Q_1 + Q_2$.
The total "value" (e.g., total cost, total amount of pure substance) in the mixture is the sum of the values contributed by each ingredient:
$\text{Total Value} = Q_1 \times C_1 + Q_2 \times C_2$
The mean value of the mixture, $C_m$, is the total value divided by the total quantity:
$\text{C}_m = \frac{\text{Total Value}}{\text{Total Quantity}} = \frac{Q_1 C_1 + Q_2 C_2}{Q_1 + Q_2}$
[Definition of Mean Value]
Our goal is to find the ratio $\frac{Q_1}{Q_2}$. Let's rearrange the equation to isolate the terms involving $Q_1$ and $Q_2$.
Multiply both sides by $(Q_1 + Q_2)$:
$(Q_1 + Q_2) C_m = Q_1 C_1 + Q_2 C_2$
Distribute $C_m$ on the left side:
$\text{Q}_1 C_m + Q_2 C_m = Q_1 C_1 + Q_2 C_2$
Group terms involving $Q_1$ on one side and terms involving $Q_2$ on the other side:
$\text{Q}_2 C_m - Q_2 C_2 = Q_1 C_1 - Q_1 C_m$
[Rearranging terms]
Factor out $Q_2$ on the left side and $Q_1$ on the right side:
$\text{Q}_2 (C_m - C_2) = Q_1 (C_1 - C_m)$
Since $C_1 < C_m < C_2$, the terms $(C_m - C_2)$ and $(C_1 - C_m)$ are negative. To get positive differences as shown in the alligation diagram, we can rewrite the equation as:
$\text{Q}_2 (-(C_2 - C_m)) = Q_1 (-(C_m - C_1))$
$-\text{Q}_2 (C_2 - C_m) = -Q_1 (C_m - C_1)$
Divide both sides by $-1$ and then rearrange to find the ratio $\frac{Q_1}{Q_2}$:
$\frac{Q_1}{Q_2} = \frac{C_2 - C_m}{C_m - C_1}$
... (ii)
This derived ratio matches the Rule of Alligation. It's important that the values $C_1$, $C_2$, and $C_m$ refer to the same property (e.g., all per-unit costs, or all percentage concentrations of the same substance).
Mixing More Than Two Ingredients
The basic rule of alligation is directly applicable only when mixing two ingredients. When more than two ingredients are mixed, the simplest approach is to use the concept of the weighted average directly.
If quantities $Q_1, Q_2, \dots, Q_n$ of $n$ ingredients with values $C_1, C_2, \dots, C_n$ are mixed, the mean value $C_m$ of the mixture is:
$\text{C}_m = \frac{Q_1 C_1 + Q_2 C_2 + \dots + Q_n C_n}{Q_1 + Q_2 + \dots + Q_n}$
... (iii)
If you are given a desired mean value $C_m$ and the values $C_i$ for multiple ingredients, and you need to find the quantities or ratios, you can sometimes pair ingredients (one cheaper than the mean, one dearer than the mean) and apply the rule of alligation pairwise, or use algebraic methods based on the weighted average formula.
Problems Involving Removing and Replacing a Mixture
A specific type of mixture problem involves starting with a vessel full of a pure liquid, removing a certain amount of the liquid, and replacing it with another liquid (usually water). This process is then repeated one or more times. We often need to find the quantity of the original liquid remaining in the vessel after several such operations.
Suppose a vessel initially contains $V$ units of a pure liquid. In each operation, $x$ units of the current mixture are drawn out and replaced with $x$ units of another liquid (e.g., water). This process is repeated $n$ times.
Let's track the quantity of the original liquid.
Initially (before 1st operation): Quantity of original liquid = $V$. Total quantity = $V$. Concentration of original liquid = $\frac{V}{V} = 1$.
After 1st operation: $x$ units of milk are removed. Quantity of original liquid removed = $x$. Quantity of original liquid remaining = $V - x$. $x$ units of water are added. Total quantity = $(V-x) + x = V$. Concentration of original liquid = $\frac{V-x}{V} = 1 - \frac{x}{V}$.
After 2nd operation: $x$ units of the mixture are removed. The concentration of the original liquid in this mixture is $1 - \frac{x}{V}$. Quantity of original liquid removed = $x \times \left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right)$. Quantity of original liquid remaining = $(V - x) - x \left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right)$.
A simpler way is to consider the fraction of original liquid remaining. After the first operation, the fraction is $1 - \frac{x}{V}$. In the second operation, $x$ units of the *mixture* are removed. These $x$ units contain $x \times \left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right)$ of the original liquid. The remaining quantity of original liquid is $V - x \left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right)$. The fraction of original liquid remaining in the $V-x$ part of the mixture is still $1 - \frac{x}{V}$. When $x$ units of water are added back, the total volume is $V$. The quantity of original liquid is what was left *before* adding water, $(V-x) \times (1-\frac{x}{V})$.Let $V_k$ be the quantity of original liquid after $k$ operations. $V_0 = V$. After 1st op: Quantity removed = $x$. Remaining Original = $V-x$. Quantity water added = $x$. Total volume = $V$. After 2nd op: Quantity of original liquid removed = $x \times (\text{concentration after 1st op}) = x \times \frac{V-x}{V}$. Remaining Original = $(V-x) - x \frac{V-x}{V} = (V-x)\left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right) = V\left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right)\left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right) = V\left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right)^2$.
Following this pattern, after $n$ such operations, the quantity of the original liquid remaining in the container is given by the formula:
$\text{Quantity of Original Liquid Remaining} = V \left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right)^n$
... (iv)
Where:
- $V$ is the initial volume of the pure liquid.
- $x$ is the volume of mixture removed and replaced in each operation.
- $n$ is the total number of times the operation of removing and replacing is performed.
The quantity of water in the container after $n$ operations would be $V - V \left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right)^n$.
Examples
Example 1. In what ratio must rice at $\textsf{₹}60$ per kg be mixed with rice at $\textsf{₹}75$ per kg so that the mixture costs $\textsf{₹}65$ per kg?
Answer:
This is a mixture problem involving two ingredients with different costs per unit, and we want to find the ratio to achieve a desired mean cost. We can use the Rule of Alligation.
- Cost of Cheaper Rice ($C_1$) = $\textsf{₹}60$ per kg.
- Cost of Dearer Rice ($C_2$) = $\textsf{₹}75$ per kg.
- Mean Cost of Mixture ($C_m$) = $\textsf{₹}65$ per kg.
We know $C_1 = 60$, $C_2 = 75$, and $C_m = 65$. Note that $60 < 65 < 75$.
Using the alligation cross diagram:
Cheaper Rice | Mean Cost $\textsf{₹}65$ | Difference 1 | ||
Cost/kg | $\textsf{₹}60$ | $75 - 65 = 10$ | (Parts of Cheaper Rice) | |
Dearer Rice | Difference 2 | |||
Cost/kg | $\textsf{₹}75$ | $65 - 60 = 5$ | (Parts of Dearer Rice) |
The ratio of the quantity of cheaper rice to the quantity of dearer rice is given by the values obtained diagonally opposite to their costs.
$\frac{\text{Quantity of Rice at } ₹60}{\text{Quantity of Rice at } ₹75} = \frac{C_2 - C_m}{C_m - C_1} = \frac{75 - 65}{65 - 60} = \frac{10}{5}$
Simplify the ratio:
$\text{Ratio} = \frac{10}{5} = \frac{\cancel{10}^{2}}{\cancel{5}_{1}} = \frac{2}{1}$
[Simplified Ratio]
The rice must be mixed in the ratio of 2 parts of the cheaper rice (at $\textsf{₹}60$ per kg) to 1 part of the dearer rice (at $\textsf{₹}75$ per kg).
Verification (using weighted average):
If we mix 2 kg of rice at $\textsf{₹}60$/kg and 1 kg of rice at $\textsf{₹}75$/kg:
Total cost = $(2 \times 60) + (1 \times 75) = 120 + 75 = \textsf{₹}195$.
Total quantity = $2 \text{ kg} + 1 \text{ kg} = 3 \text{ kg}$.
Mean cost = $\frac{\text{Total Cost}}{\text{Total Quantity}} = \frac{195}{3} = \textsf{₹}65$ per kg.
This matches the desired mean cost, confirming the ratio is correct.
Example 2. A container contains 40 litres of milk. From this container, 4 litres of milk were taken out and replaced by water. This process was repeated two more times. How much milk is now contained in the container?
Answer:
Given:
- Initial quantity of pure milk, $V = 40$ litres.
- Quantity of mixture removed and replaced with water in each operation, $x = 4$ litres.
- The process was repeated two more times after the first operation. So, the total number of times the removal and replacement process was performed is $n = 1 \text{ (initial operation)} + 2 \text{ (repeated operations)} = 3$.
We need to find the quantity of original milk remaining in the container after 3 operations.
Using the formula for the quantity of original liquid remaining after $n$ operations (Formula (iv)):
$\text{Quantity of Milk Remaining} = V \left(1 - \frac{x}{V}\right)^n$
[Formula for remaining quantity]
Substitute the given values $V = 40$, $x = 4$, and $n = 3$:
$\text{Quantity} = 40 \left(1 - \frac{4}{40}\right)^3$
Simplify the fraction inside the parenthesis:
$\text{Quantity} = 40 \left(1 - \frac{1}{10}\right)^3$
Calculate the term inside the parenthesis: $1 - \frac{1}{10} = \frac{10}{10} - \frac{1}{10} = \frac{9}{10}$.
$\text{Quantity} = 40 \left(\frac{9}{10}\right)^3$
Calculate the power of the fraction: $\left(\frac{9}{10}\right)^3 = \frac{9^3}{10^3} = \frac{9 \times 9 \times 9}{10 \times 10 \times 10} = \frac{81 \times 9}{1000} = \frac{729}{1000}$.
$\text{Quantity} = 40 \times \frac{729}{1000}$
Perform the multiplication:
$\text{Quantity} = \frac{\cancel{40}^{4}}{\cancel{1000}_{100}} \times 729 = \frac{4 \times 729}{100}$
[Cancelling common factors]
$\text{Quantity} = \frac{2916}{100} = 29.16$
Quantity of Milk Remaining $= 29.16 \text{ litres}$
[Final Quantity]
After 3 operations of removing 4 litres of mixture and replacing with water, 29.16 litres of milk remains in the container.
Numerical Problems
Applied Mathematics often involves solving quantitative problems from various real-world scenarios. This section focuses on revisiting and applying fundamental concepts from arithmetic and algebra to solve numerical problems related to percentages, profit and loss, and simple and compound interest. These topics are essential for developing numerical aptitude and are widely applicable in personal finance, business, and other quantitative fields.
Percentages
The term Percentage means "out of one hundred". It is a way of expressing a number as a fraction of 100. Percentages are used to represent parts of a whole, proportions, or relative changes.
A percentage is denoted by the symbol '%'. If we have $x\%$, it means $\frac{x}{100}$.
Example: $25\% = \frac{25}{100} = 0.25$. $150\% = \frac{150}{100} = 1.5$.
Conversion between Percentage, Fraction, and Decimal:
Percentage to Fraction/Decimal: Divide the percentage by 100.
$p\% = \frac{p}{100}$ (Fraction)
$\text{p}\% = \frac{p}{100}$ (Decimal)
Fraction/Decimal to Percentage: Multiply the fraction or decimal by 100 and add the '%' symbol.
$\text{Fraction } F \implies (F \times 100)\%$
$\text{Decimal } D \implies (D \times 100)\%$
Percentage Increase or Decrease:
To find the percentage change in a value, we compare the amount of change to the original value and express it as a percentage.
Percentage Increase:
If a value increases from an Original Value to a New Value, the Increase is (New Value - Original Value).
$\text{Percentage Increase} = \frac{\text{Increase}}{\text{Original Value}} \times 100\%$
... (i)
Percentage Decrease:
If a value decreases from an Original Value to a New Value, the Decrease is (Original Value - New Value).
$\text{Percentage Decrease} = \frac{\text{Decrease}}{\text{Original Value}} \times 100\%$
... (ii)
Finding a Value After Percentage Change:
If a value undergoes a percentage increase or decrease, the new value can be directly calculated.
Value after $x\%$ Increase:
New Value = Original Value + Increase Amount
Increase Amount = Original Value $\times \frac{x}{100}$
$\text{New Value} = \text{Original Value} + \text{Original Value} \times \frac{x}{100}$
$\text{New Value} = \text{Original Value} \times \left(1 + \frac{x}{100}\right)$
... (iii)
Value after $x\%$ Decrease:
New Value = Original Value - Decrease Amount
Decrease Amount = Original Value $\times \frac{x}{100}$
$\text{New Value} = \text{Original Value} - \text{Original Value} \times \frac{x}{100}$
$\text{New Value} = \text{Original Value} \times \left(1 - \frac{x}{100}\right)$
... (iv)
These formulas are useful for calculating prices after discounts, taxes, or growth/decay over one period.
Profit and Loss
Profit and Loss are terms used in business and commerce to describe the financial outcome of buying and selling goods or services. They are calculated based on the relationship between the cost incurred to acquire or produce an item (Cost Price) and the price at which it is sold (Selling Price).
Cost Price (CP): The amount for which an article is bought. This may include overhead expenses like transportation, labour, etc.
Selling Price (SP): The amount for which an article is sold.
Profit or Gain:
A profit is made when the Selling Price (SP) is greater than the Cost Price (CP).
$\text{Profit} = \text{SP} - \text{CP}$
[When SP > CP]
Profit is often expressed as a percentage of the Cost Price.
$\text{Profit Percentage} = \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{CP}} \times 100\% = \frac{\text{SP - CP}}{\text{CP}} \times 100\%$
... (v)
Loss:
A loss is incurred when the Selling Price (SP) is less than the Cost Price (CP).
$\text{Loss} = \text{CP} - \text{SP}$
[When SP < CP]
Loss is often expressed as a percentage of the Cost Price.
$\text{Loss Percentage} = \frac{\text{Loss}}{\text{CP}} \times 100\% = \frac{\text{CP - SP}}{\text{CP}} \times 100\%$
... (vi)
Important Note: Unless explicitly stated otherwise, Profit or Loss percentage is always calculated with respect to the Cost Price (CP).
Relating Selling Price and Cost Price:
We can express the Selling Price directly in terms of the Cost Price and the Profit or Loss percentage.
If there is a Profit of $P\%$ ($P$ is the percentage value, e.g., 15):
$\text{Profit Amount} = \text{CP} \times \frac{P}{100}$
$\text{SP} = \text{CP} + \text{Profit Amount} = \text{CP} + \text{CP} \times \frac{P}{100}$
$\text{SP} = \text{CP} \times \left(1 + \frac{P}{100}\right)$
... (vii)
If there is a Loss of $L\%$ ($L$ is the percentage value):
$\text{Loss Amount} = \text{CP} \times \frac{L}{100}$
$\text{SP} = \text{CP} - \text{Loss Amount} = \text{CP} - \text{CP} \times \frac{L}{100}$
$\text{SP} = \text{CP} \times \left(1 - \frac{L}{100}\right)$
... (viii)
Simple and Compound Interest
Interest is the cost of borrowing money or the return on investment. We covered the basic concepts (Principal, Rate, Time, Amount) and the calculation methods (Simple vs. Compound Interest) in detail in Chapter 11 on Financial Mathematics. Here, we'll recall the key formulas for numerical problems.
Let $P$ be the Principal amount.
Let $R$ be the Nominal Annual Rate of Interest (as a percentage, e.g., 10 for 10%).
Let $T$ be the Time period in years.
Let $n$ be the number of times interest is compounded per year.
Let $A$ be the Total Amount (Principal + Interest).
Simple Interest (SI):
Interest is calculated only on the original principal.
$\text{SI} = \frac{P \times R \times T}{100}$
... (ix)
$\text{Amount (A)} = P + SI = P \left(1 + \frac{R \times T}{100}\right)$
... (x)
Compound Interest (CI):
Interest is calculated on the principal plus accumulated interest.
If interest is compounded annually ($n=1$):
$\text{Amount (A)} = P \left(1 + \frac{R}{100}\right)^T$
... (xi)
$\text{CI} = A - P = P \left[\left(1 + \frac{R}{100}\right)^T - 1\right]$
... (xii)
If interest is compounded $n$ times a year:
- Rate per compounding period (as percentage) = $R/n$.
- Total number of compounding periods = $T \times n$.
$\text{Amount (A)} = P \left(1 + \frac{R/n}{100}\right)^{T \times n} = P \left(1 + \frac{R}{100n}\right)^{nT}$
... (xiii)
$\text{CI} = A - P = P \left[\left(1 + \frac{R}{100n}\right)^{nT} - 1\right]$
... (xiv)
Difference between CI and SI:
For the same principal ($P$), rate ($R\%$ p.a.), and time ($T$ years), the compound interest is generally higher than simple interest (except for $T=1$). The difference arises because compound interest earns interest on previous interest.
Let's derive the difference for 2 and 3 years (compounded annually):
Difference (CI - SI) for 2 years:
$\text{CI} - \text{SI} = \left[P \left(1 + \frac{R}{100}\right)^2 - P\right] - \frac{P \times R \times 2}{100}$
[Using Formulas (xi) and (ix)]
$= P \left[ \left(1 + 2\frac{R}{100} + \left(\frac{R}{100}\right)^2 \right) - 1 \right] - \frac{2PR}{100}$
[Expanding $(1 + \frac{R}{100})^2$]
$= P \left[ 1 + \frac{2R}{100} + \frac{R^2}{100^2} - 1 \right] - \frac{2PR}{100}$
$= P \left[ \frac{2R}{100} + \frac{R^2}{10000} \right] - \frac{2PR}{100}$
$= \frac{2PR}{100} + \frac{PR^2}{10000} - \frac{2PR}{100}$
$\text{CI} - \text{SI} = \frac{PR^2}{10000} = \frac{PR^2}{100^2}$
... (xv)
Difference (CI - SI) for 3 years:
$\text{CI} - \text{SI} = \left[P \left(1 + \frac{R}{100}\right)^3 - P\right] - \frac{P \times R \times 3}{100}$
[Using Formulas (xi) and (ix)]
$= P \left[ \left(1 + 3\frac{R}{100} + 3\left(\frac{R}{100}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{R}{100}\right)^3 \right) - 1 \right] - \frac{3PR}{100}$
[Expanding $(1 + \frac{R}{100})^3$]
$= P \left[ 1 + \frac{3R}{100} + \frac{3R^2}{100^2} + \frac{R^3}{100^3} - 1 \right] - \frac{3PR}{100}$
$= P \left[ \frac{3R}{100} + \frac{3R^2}{10000} + \frac{R^3}{1000000} \right] - \frac{3PR}{100}$
$= \frac{3PR}{100} + \frac{3PR^2}{10000} + \frac{PR^3}{1000000} - \frac{3PR}{100}$
$\text{CI} - \text{SI} = \frac{3PR^2}{10000} + \frac{PR^3}{1000000}$
$\text{CI} - \text{SI} = \frac{PR^2}{100^2} \left(3 + \frac{R}{100}\right)$
... (xvi)
These difference formulas are helpful for quickly finding the difference between CI and SI for 2 or 3 years given P and R.
Examples
Example 1. A shopkeeper buys an article for $\textsf{₹}400$ and sells it for $\textsf{₹}460$. Find the profit percentage.
Answer:
Given:
- Cost Price (CP) = $\textsf{₹}400$.
- Selling Price (SP) = $\textsf{₹}460$.
Since SP ($\textsf{₹}460$) is greater than CP ($\textsf{₹}400$), the shopkeeper made a profit.
Calculate the Profit amount:
$\text{Profit} = \text{SP} - \text{CP} = \textsf{₹}460 - \textsf{₹}400 = \textsf{₹}60$
[Profit Amount]
Calculate the Profit percentage using the formula (v), based on CP:
$\text{Profit Percentage} = \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{CP}} \times 100\%$
[Profit % Formula]
Substitute the values:
$\text{Profit Percentage} = \frac{60}{400} \times 100\%$
$= \frac{\cancel{60}^{3}}{\cancel{400}_{20}} \times 100\%$
[Cancelling common factors]
$= \frac{3}{20} \times 100\%$
$= 3 \times \frac{\cancel{100}^{5}}{\cancel{20}_{1}}\%$
[Cancelling common factors]
$= 15\%$
[Profit Percentage]
The profit percentage is $15\%$.
Example 2. Find the compound interest on $\textsf{₹}10,000$ for 2 years at $10\%$ per annum, compounded annually.
Answer:
Given:
- Principal (P) = $\textsf{₹}10,000$.
- Rate (R) = $10\%$ per annum.
- Time (T) = 2 years.
- Compounding frequency: Annually ($n=1$).
We need to find the Compound Interest (CI). First, we calculate the total Amount (A) accumulated.
Using the formula for Amount with compound interest compounded annually (Formula (xi)):
$\text{A} = P \left(1 + \frac{R}{100}\right)^T$
[Amount with CI Formula]
Substitute the given values:
$\text{A} = 10000 \left(1 + \frac{10}{100}\right)^2$
$\text{A} = 10000 \left(1 + 0.10\right)^2 = 10000 (1.10)^2$
Calculate $(1.10)^2 = 1.10 \times 1.10 = 1.21$.
$\text{A} = 10000 \times 1.21$
$\text{A} = 12100$
[Total Amount]
The total amount after 2 years is $\textsf{₹}12,100$.
Now, calculate the Compound Interest (CI) by subtracting the principal from the amount:
$\text{CI} = A - P = \textsf{₹}12100 - \textsf{₹}10000 = \textsf{₹}2100$
[Compound Interest]
The compound interest on $\textsf{₹}10,000$ for 2 years at $10\%$ per annum compounded annually is $\textsf{₹}2,100$.
Comparison with Simple Interest:
For the same period and rate, Simple Interest would be:
$\text{SI} = \frac{P \times R \times T}{100} = \frac{10000 \times 10 \times 2}{100} = \frac{200000}{100} = \textsf{₹}2000$
The difference CI - SI = $\textsf{₹}2100 - \textsf{₹}2000 = \textsf{₹}100$.
Using the difference formula for 2 years (Formula (xv)):
$\text{CI} - \text{SI} = \frac{PR^2}{100^2} = \frac{10000 \times 10^2}{10000} = \frac{10000 \times 100}{10000} = \textsf{₹}100$
The difference matches the calculated value.
Boats and Streams (upstream and downstream)
The concept of Boats and Streams deals with problems involving motion in water, where the speed of the water current affects the effective speed of a boat or a swimmer. These problems are applications of relative speed principles. The key idea is to understand how the speed of the stream either assists or opposes the motion of the boat or swimmer.
Definitions
To analyze problems involving boats and streams, we use the following terms:
Speed of the boat or swimmer in still water ($v_b$): This is the speed at which the boat would travel or the swimmer would swim if there were no water current. It is the inherent speed of the boat or swimmer relative to the water itself. The units are typically km/hr or m/sec.
Speed of the stream or current ($v_s$): This is the speed at which the water is flowing. It represents the speed of the water relative to the ground. The units are typically the same as $v_b$ (km/hr or m/sec).
Downstream: Refers to the direction in which the boat or swimmer moves along with the flow of the stream. The motion is in the same direction as the current.
Upstream: Refers to the direction in which the boat or swimmer moves against the flow of the stream. The motion is in the opposite direction to the current.
Effective Speeds
When a boat or swimmer is in a flowing stream, their speed relative to the ground is affected by the speed of the stream. We consider the effective speed in the downstream and upstream directions.
1. Speed Downstream ($v_d$):
When the boat or swimmer moves downstream, the speed of the stream adds to their speed in still water. The water current helps them move faster relative to the ground.
Effective Speed Downstream = Speed in still water + Speed of stream
$\mathbf{v_d = v_b + v_s}$
... (i)
2. Speed Upstream ($v_u$):
When the boat or swimmer moves upstream, the speed of the stream opposes their motion. The water current pushes against them, slowing them down relative to the ground.
Effective Speed Upstream = Speed in still water - Speed of stream
$\mathbf{v_u = v_b - v_s}$
... (ii)
For upstream motion to be possible (i.e., for the boat/swimmer to make progress against the current), the speed of the boat or swimmer in still water ($v_b$) must be greater than the speed of the stream ($v_s$). If $v_b \leq v_s$, the boat or swimmer will be carried downstream by the current, even when attempting to move upstream.
Finding Speed in Still Water and Speed of Stream
If we are given the effective speeds downstream ($v_d$) and upstream ($v_u$), we can use the two equations above to find the speed of the boat/swimmer in still water ($v_b$) and the speed of the stream ($v_s$). We have a system of two linear equations:
Equation (i): $v_d = v_b + v_s$
Equation (ii): $v_u = v_b - v_s$
To find $v_b$: Add Equation (i) and Equation (ii).
$(v_b + v_s) + (v_b - v_s) = v_d + v_u$
$\text{v}_b + v_s + v_b - v_s = v_d + v_u$
$\text{2v}_b = v_d + v_u$
$\mathbf{v_b = \frac{v_d + v_u}{2}}$
... (iii)
The speed of the boat/swimmer in still water is the average of the downstream and upstream speeds.
To find $v_s$: Subtract Equation (ii) from Equation (i).
$(v_b + v_s) - (v_b - v_s) = v_d - v_u$
$\text{v}_b + v_s - v_b + v_s = v_d - v_u$
$\text{2v}_s = v_d - v_u$
$\mathbf{v_s = \frac{v_d - v_u}{2}}$
... (iv)
The speed of the stream is half the difference between the downstream and upstream speeds.
Relating Distance, Speed, and Time
Problems in this topic often involve calculating distances, speeds, or times using the fundamental relationship:
$\text{Distance} = \text{Speed} \times \text{Time}$
This relationship can be rearranged to find speed (Speed = Distance / Time) or time (Time = Distance / Speed).
When applying this relationship in boats and streams problems, always use the effective speed for the direction of travel:
For Downstream Motion: If distance traveled downstream is $D_d$ and time taken is $T_d$, then $D_d = v_d \times T_d = (v_b + v_s) \times T_d$.
For Upstream Motion: If distance traveled upstream is $D_u$ and time taken is $T_u$, then $D_u = v_u \times T_u = (v_b - v_s) \times T_u$.
Examples
Example 1. A man can row at 5 km/hr in still water. If the speed of the stream is 1 km/hr, how long will he take to row 12 km downstream?
Answer:
Given:
- Speed of man in still water, $v_b = 5$ km/hr.
- Speed of stream, $v_s = 1$ km/hr.
- Distance to travel downstream, $D_d = 12$ km.
We need to find the time taken to travel downstream ($T_d$).
First, calculate the effective speed downstream ($v_d$) using Formula (i):
$\text{v}_d = v_b + v_s = 5 \text{ km/hr} + 1 \text{ km/hr} = 6 \text{ km/hr}$
[Speed Downstream]
Now, use the relationship Time = Distance / Speed to find the time taken:
$\text{T}_d = \frac{\text{Distance}}{\text{Speed Downstream}} = \frac{D_d}{v_d}$
Substitute the distance and downstream speed:
$\text{T}_d = \frac{12 \text{ km}}{6 \text{ km/hr}} = 2 \text{ hours}$
[Time Taken]
The man will take 2 hours to row 12 km downstream.
Example 2. A boat goes 20 km downstream in 2 hours and 12 km upstream in 3 hours. Find the speed of the boat in still water and the speed of the stream.
Answer:
Given:
- Downstream: Distance $D_d = 20$ km, Time $T_d = 2$ hours.
- Upstream: Distance $D_u = 12$ km, Time $T_u = 3$ hours.
We need to find the speed of the boat in still water ($v_b$) and the speed of the stream ($v_s$).
First, calculate the speed downstream ($v_d$) and speed upstream ($v_u$) using the formula Speed = Distance / Time:
$\text{Speed Downstream } (v_d) = \frac{D_d}{T_d} = \frac{20 \text{ km}}{2 \text{ hours}} = 10 \text{ km/hr}$
[Calculated $v_d$]
$\text{Speed Upstream } (v_u) = \frac{D_u}{T_u} = \frac{12 \text{ km}}{3 \text{ hours}} = 4 \text{ km/hr}$
[Calculated $v_u$]
Now we have the values for $v_d$ and $v_u$. We can use the formulas (iii) and (iv) to find $v_b$ and $v_s$.
Calculate Speed of boat in still water ($v_b$):
$\text{v}_b = \frac{v_d + v_u}{2}$
[Formula for $v_b$]
$\text{v}_b = \frac{10 \text{ km/hr} + 4 \text{ km/hr}}{2} = \frac{14 \text{ km/hr}}{2} = 7 \text{ km/hr}$
[Speed in Still Water]
Calculate Speed of stream ($v_s$):
$\text{v}_s = \frac{v_d - v_u}{2}$
[Formula for $v_s$]
$\text{v}_s = \frac{10 \text{ km/hr} - 4 \text{ km/hr}}{2} = \frac{6 \text{ km/hr}}{2} = 3 \text{ km/hr}$
[Speed of Stream]
The speed of the boat in still water is 7 km/hr and the speed of the stream is 3 km/hr.
Pipes and Cisterns
Pipes and Cisterns is a common topic in numerical problems, which is essentially an application of the concepts used in "Time and Work". Instead of individuals working on a task, the "workers" are pipes (or faucets, taps, etc.), and the "task" is filling or emptying a container, typically a tank or cistern.
The core idea remains the same: determine the rate at which each pipe performs its task and then combine these rates to find the rate when multiple pipes work together.
Basic Concepts
In Pipes and Cisterns problems:
Total Work: The total work is usually considered as filling or emptying the entire cistern. This can be represented as 1 unit of work or, more abstractly, as the total capacity of the cistern.
Rate of Work (Efficiency): The rate of a pipe is the amount of the cistern that can be filled or emptied by that pipe in one unit of time (e.g., per hour, per minute, per second). If a pipe completes the total work (fills or empties the entire cistern) in a certain amount of time, its rate is the reciprocal of that time.
1. Filling Pipes (Inlet Pipes):
These are pipes that add liquid to the cistern, hence filling it. If a filling pipe can fill the entire cistern in $T_{\text{fill}}$ units of time, its rate of filling is $\frac{1}{T_{\text{fill}}}$ of the cistern per unit of time. The work done by a filling pipe is considered positive.
2. Emptying Pipes (Outlet Pipes or Leaks):
These are pipes or leaks that remove liquid from the cistern, hence emptying it. If an emptying pipe can empty the entire cistern in $T_{\text{empty}}$ units of time, its rate of emptying is $\frac{1}{T_{\text{empty}}}$ of the cistern per unit of time. The work done by an emptying pipe is considered negative.
It is assumed that the rate of flow of liquid through a pipe is constant unless stated otherwise.
Pipes Working Together
When multiple pipes are operating simultaneously, their individual rates of filling or emptying are combined to find the net effect on the cistern. The combined rate is the algebraic sum of their individual rates.
Let there be $k$ pipes, $P_1, P_2, \dots, P_k$, connected to a cistern. Let their individual rates be $r_1, r_2, \dots, r_k$ respectively, where $r_i = \frac{1}{T_i}$ if $P_i$ can fill or empty the cistern in $T_i$ time units. $r_i$ is positive for filling pipes and negative for emptying pipes.
The Combined Rate ($r_{\text{combined}}$) when all pipes work together is:
$\text{r}_{\text{combined}} = r_1 + r_2 + \dots + r_k$
If $r_{\text{combined}}$ is positive, the cistern will fill. If $r_{\text{combined}}$ is negative, the cistern will empty (assuming it initially contained liquid).
The time taken to fill or empty the entire cistern (1 unit of work) is the reciprocal of the combined rate:
$\text{Time} = \frac{\text{Total Work}}{\text{Combined Rate}} = \frac{1}{r_{\text{combined}}}$
... (i)
Specific Cases:
Two Filling Pipes: If pipe A fills in $T_A$ hours and pipe B fills in $T_B$ hours.
Rate of A = $\frac{1}{T_A}$, Rate of B = $\frac{1}{T_B}$.
Combined Rate = $\frac{1}{T_A} + \frac{1}{T_B} = \frac{T_B + T_A}{T_A T_B}$.
Time taken together to fill = $\frac{1}{\text{Combined Rate}} = \frac{T_A T_B}{T_A + T_B}$.
One Filling Pipe and One Emptying Pipe: If pipe A fills in $T_A$ hours and pipe B empties in $T_B$ hours. For the tank to fill, the filling rate must be greater than the emptying rate, which implies $T_A < T_B$.
Rate of A = $\frac{1}{T_A}$, Rate of B = $-\frac{1}{T_B}$.
Combined Rate = $\frac{1}{T_A} + \left(-\frac{1}{T_B}\right) = \frac{1}{T_A} - \frac{1}{T_B} = \frac{T_B - T_A}{T_A T_B}$.
Time taken together to fill = $\frac{1}{\text{Combined Rate}} = \frac{T_A T_B}{T_B - T_A}$ (assuming $T_A < T_B$).
If $T_A > T_B$, the emptying pipe is faster, the tank will empty, and the time to empty would be $\frac{T_A T_B}{T_A - T_B}$ (using the magnitude of the negative combined rate).
Examples
Example 1. Two pipes A and B can fill a tank in 10 hours and 15 hours respectively. If both pipes are opened together, how long will they take to fill the tank?
Answer:
Given:
- Time taken by pipe A to fill the tank = 10 hours.
- Time taken by pipe B to fill the tank = 15 hours.
Both are filling pipes.
Rate of pipe A (amount filled by A in 1 hour) = $\frac{1}{10}$ of the tank.
Rate of pipe B (amount filled by B in 1 hour) = $\frac{1}{15}$ of the tank.
When both pipes are opened together, their rates of filling are added.
$\text{Combined rate} = \text{Rate of A} + \text{Rate of B}$
$\text{Combined rate} = \frac{1}{10} + \frac{1}{15}$ (tank per hour)
To add these fractions, find a common denominator, which is the LCM of 10 and 15.
Prime factorization of 10: $2 \times 5$.
Prime factorization of 15: $3 \times 5$.
LCM(10, 15) = $2 \times 3 \times 5 = 30$.
$\text{Combined rate} = \frac{1 \times 3}{10 \times 3} + \frac{1 \times 2}{15 \times 2} = \frac{3}{30} + \frac{2}{30}$
$\text{Combined rate} = \frac{3 + 2}{30} = \frac{5}{30}$ (tank per hour)
Simplify the combined rate:
$\text{Combined rate} = \frac{\cancel{5}^{1}}{\cancel{30}_{6}} = \frac{1}{6}$ (tank per hour)
[Combined Rate]
The combined rate is positive, so the tank will fill.
The time taken to fill the tank is the reciprocal of the combined rate:
$\text{Time} = \frac{1}{\text{Combined Rate}} = \frac{1}{1/6}$ hours
$\text{Time} = 6$ hours
[Time to Fill]
Both pipes A and B together will take 6 hours to fill the tank.
Alternative Method (using product/sum formula for two filling pipes):
Time taken together = $\frac{T_A T_B}{T_A + T_B}$
$\text{Time} = \frac{10 \times 15}{10 + 15} = \frac{150}{25}$
$\text{Time} = 6$ hours
This confirms the result.
Example 2. Pipe A can fill a tank in 12 hours and pipe B can empty it in 18 hours. If both pipes are opened together, how long will it take to fill the tank?
Answer:
Given:
- Time taken by pipe A (filling) = 12 hours.
- Time taken by pipe B (emptying) = 18 hours.
Rate of pipe A (amount filled by A in 1 hour) = $\frac{1}{12}$ of the tank (positive rate).
Rate of pipe B (amount emptied by B in 1 hour) = $\frac{1}{18}$ of the tank (negative rate). So, Rate of B = $-\frac{1}{18}$.
When both pipes are opened together, their rates are combined algebraically.
$\text{Combined rate} = \text{Rate of A} + \text{Rate of B}$
$\text{Combined rate} = \frac{1}{12} + \left(-\frac{1}{18}\right) = \frac{1}{12} - \frac{1}{18}$ (tank per hour)
To subtract these fractions, find a common denominator, which is the LCM of 12 and 18.
Prime factorization of 12: $2^2 \times 3$.
Prime factorization of 18: $2 \times 3^2$.
LCM(12, 18) = $2^2 \times 3^2 = 4 \times 9 = 36$.
$\text{Combined rate} = \frac{1 \times 3}{12 \times 3} - \frac{1 \times 2}{18 \times 2} = \frac{3}{36} - \frac{2}{36}$
$\text{Combined rate} = \frac{3 - 2}{36} = \frac{1}{36}$ (tank per hour)
[Combined Rate]
Since the combined rate is positive ($1/36 > 0$), the tank will fill.
The time taken to fill the tank is the reciprocal of the combined rate:
$\text{Time} = \frac{1}{\text{Combined Rate}} = \frac{1}{1/36}$ hours
$\text{Time} = 36$ hours
[Time to Fill]
Both pipes A and B together will take 36 hours to fill the tank.
Alternative Method (using product/difference formula for one filling and one emptying pipe):
Time taken together to fill = $\frac{T_A \times T_B}{T_B - T_A}$ (This formula is for when the tank fills, i.e., $T_A < T_B$).
Here, $T_A = 12$ and $T_B = 18$. Since $12 < 18$, the tank will fill.
$\text{Time} = \frac{12 \times 18}{18 - 12} = \frac{216}{6}$
$\text{Time} = 36$ hours
This confirms the result.
Races and Games
The topic of Races and Games in numerical problems deals with comparing the performance of participants in competitive scenarios. These problems often involve concepts of speed, distance, and time, or comparing the abilities of players based on points or scores. They require understanding relative speeds, interpreting scenarios where one participant gives a "start" to another, or comparing performances over different distances or formats.
Races
Problems related to races usually involve participants running, swimming, or rowing over a fixed distance. Comparing how participants finish relative to each other (who wins, by what margin) or how they perform when given a head start are common themes.
1. Giving a Start:
When one participant "gives a start" to another, it means the slower participant is given an advantage before the race begins.
Start in Distance: If participant A gives participant B a start of $x$ meters in a race of $L$ meters, it implies that B starts $x$ meters ahead of the starting line. Effectively, A has to cover the full distance $L$ meters, while B only has to cover $(L - x)$ meters from their starting position to the finish line. If they start at the same time, the time taken by A to cover $L$ meters is equal to the time taken by B to cover $(L - x)$ meters.
Start in Time: If participant A gives participant B a start of $t$ seconds, it means B starts running $t$ seconds before A. If they both cover the full distance $L$, A will take $t$ seconds less than B to complete the race. If B takes $T_B$ seconds, A takes $T_B - t$ seconds.
2. Winning a Race:
Describing how one participant wins a race relative to another provides information about their speeds.
Winning by a Distance: If participant A beats participant B by $x$ meters in a race of $L$ meters (assuming they start at the same time from the same starting line), it means when A finishes the race (covers $L$ meters), B is $x$ meters behind the finish line. In the same amount of time that A covers $L$ meters, B covers $(L - x)$ meters.
Winning by a Time: If participant A beats participant B by $t$ seconds in a race of $L$ meters (assuming they start at the same time from the same starting line), it means A finishes the race $t$ seconds earlier than B. If A takes $T_A$ seconds to cover $L$ meters, B takes $(T_A + t)$ seconds to cover the same $L$ meters.
3. Comparing Speeds:
The relationship between distance, speed, and time ($D = S \times T$) is fundamental. When comparing participants in a race:
For the same distance (D): If participants A and B cover the same distance $D$, and their speeds are $S_A, S_B$ and times taken are $T_A, T_B$, then $D = S_A \times T_A = S_B \times T_B$.
This implies that the ratio of their speeds is the inverse of the ratio of their times:
$\frac{S_A}{S_B} = \frac{T_B}{T_A}$
... (i)
For the same time (T): If participants A and B run for the same amount of time $T$, and their speeds are $S_A, S_B$ and distances covered are $D_A, D_B$, then $D_A = S_A \times T$ and $D_B = S_B \times T$.
This implies that the ratio of their speeds is the same as the ratio of the distances covered:
$\frac{S_A}{S_B} = \frac{D_A}{D_B}$
... (ii)
Often, problems combine these ideas, requiring you to find the ratio of speeds between multiple participants based on their performance in one race and then apply that ratio to a different scenario or distance.
Games of Skill
Problems categorized as "Games" often involve comparing the scoring abilities of players in a game played to a certain number of points.
If player A can give player B $x$ points in a game of $P$ points, it means that in a game where A scores $P$ points, B only manages to score $(P - x)$ points. The ratio of their scoring abilities (points scored in the same duration or 'game') is $P : (P - x)$.
$\frac{\text{Points scored by A}}{\text{Points scored by B}} = \frac{P}{P - x}$
[In a game of P points, A gives B x points]
If A can beat B by $t$ seconds in a game, this relates to the time taken to score points, which can be converted to a scoring rate.
Examples
Example 1. In a 100-meter race, A can give B a start of 10 meters and C a start of 13 meters. In a race of 180 meters, how much start can B give to C?
Answer:
Let $S_A$, $S_B$, and $S_C$ be the speeds of A, B, and C respectively. Assume they run at constant speeds.
Consider the first scenario: In a 100-meter race, A gives B a start of 10 meters.
This means that when A covers 100 meters, B covers $100 - 10 = 90$ meters in the same amount of time.
Using the property that for the same time, the ratio of distances is equal to the ratio of speeds (Formula (ii)):
$\frac{S_A}{S_B} = \frac{\text{Distance covered by A}}{\text{Distance covered by B}} = \frac{100}{90} = \frac{10}{9}$
[Ratio of speeds A to B]
Consider the second scenario: In the same 100-meter race, A gives C a start of 13 meters.
This means that when A covers 100 meters, C covers $100 - 13 = 87$ meters in the same amount of time.
$\frac{S_A}{S_C} = \frac{\text{Distance covered by A}}{\text{Distance covered by C}} = \frac{100}{87}$
[Ratio of speeds A to C]
Now we need to find the ratio of speeds of B and C ($S_B : S_C$). We can find this by using the ratios involving $S_A$:
$\frac{S_B}{S_C} = \frac{S_B}{S_A} \times \frac{S_A}{S_C}$
We know $\frac{S_A}{S_B} = \frac{10}{9}$, so $\frac{S_B}{S_A} = \frac{9}{10}$.
Substitute the ratios:
$\frac{S_B}{S_C} = \frac{9}{10} \times \frac{100}{87}$
$\frac{S_B}{S_C} = \frac{9 \times \cancel{100}^{10}}{\cancel{10}_{1} \times 87} = \frac{9 \times 10}{87} = \frac{90}{87}$
[Multiplying ratios]
Simplify the fraction $\frac{90}{87}$ by dividing the numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor, which is 3.
$\frac{90 \div 3}{87 \div 3} = \frac{30}{29}$
So, the ratio of speeds of B and C is $S_B : S_C = 30 : 29$.
This means that in any given amount of time, if B covers 30 meters, C covers 29 meters.
We want to find how much start B can give C in a race of 180 meters. This means, when B covers 180 meters, how far behind is C?
When B covers 30 m, C covers 29 m.
The difference in distance covered in the same time is $30 - 29 = 1$ meter.
This means that in a 30-meter race, B can give C a start of 1 meter and win the race.
We need to find the start B can give C in a 180-meter race. Let the start be $s$ meters. This means when B covers 180 meters, C covers $(180 - s)$ meters.
The ratio of distances covered in the same time must be equal to the ratio of speeds:
$\frac{\text{Distance covered by B}}{\text{Distance covered by C}} = \frac{S_B}{S_C}$
$\frac{180}{180 - s} = \frac{30}{29}$
Cross-multiply:
$180 \times 29 = 30 \times (180 - s)$
$5220 = 5400 - 30s$
$\text{30s} = 5400 - 5220$
$\text{30s} = 180$
$\text{s} = \frac{180}{30} = 6$
[Start B gives to C]
In a race of 180 meters, B can give C a start of 6 meters. This means when B finishes the 180m race, C will have covered $180 - 6 = 174$ meters.
Check the ratio of distances covered in 180m race: $\frac{180}{174} = \frac{\cancel{180}^{30}}{\cancel{174}_{29}} = \frac{30}{29}$, which matches the ratio of speeds $S_B/S_C$.
Example 2. A beats B by 20 seconds in a 500-meter race. If the speed of A is 5 m/s, find the speed of B.
Answer:
Given:
- Distance of the race = 500 meters.
- A beats B by 20 seconds.
- Speed of A ($S_A$) = 5 m/s.
We need to find the speed of B ($S_B$).
First, calculate the time taken by A to complete the race using the relationship Time = Distance / Speed:
$\text{Time taken by A } (T_A) = \frac{\text{Distance}}{\text{Speed of A}} = \frac{500 \text{ m}}{5 \text{ m/s}}$
$\text{T}_A = 100 \text{ seconds}$
[Time taken by A]
A beats B by 20 seconds. This means A finishes 20 seconds earlier than B. So, B takes 20 seconds more than A to complete the same 500-meter race.
$\text{Time taken by B } (T_B) = T_A + 20 \text{ seconds}$
$\text{T}_B = 100 \text{ seconds} + 20 \text{ seconds} = 120 \text{ seconds}$
[Time taken by B]
B covers the entire race distance (500 meters) in 120 seconds. Now we can calculate the speed of B using Speed = Distance / Time:
$\text{Speed of B } (S_B) = \frac{\text{Distance}}{\text{Time taken by B}} = \frac{500 \text{ m}}{120 \text{ seconds}}$
$\text{S}_B = \frac{\cancel{500}^{25}}{\cancel{120}_{6}} = \frac{25}{6} \text{ m/s}$
[Speed of B]
The speed of B is $\frac{25}{6}$ meters per second. As a decimal, this is approximately 4.1667 m/s.
Numerical Inequalities
Numerical inequalities are fundamental mathematical statements that compare two expressions using inequality symbols. Unlike equations which state that two expressions are equal, inequalities state that one quantity is greater than ($>$), less than ($<$), greater than or equal to ($\ge$), or less than or equal to ($\le$) another quantity. Understanding and solving inequalities are crucial for describing ranges of values, solving problems involving constraints, and working with various mathematical concepts in Applied Mathematics.
Inequality Symbols
The basic symbols used to denote inequalities are essential vocabulary:
Symbol | Meaning | Example | Description |
---|---|---|---|
$>$ | Greater than | $5 > 3$ | 5 is strictly greater than 3. |
$<$ | Less than | $2 < 7$ | 2 is strictly less than 7. |
$\ge$ | Greater than or equal to | $x \ge 5$ | $x$ can be 5 or any real number larger than 5. Includes the value 5. |
$\le$ | Less than or equal to | $y \le 10$ | $y$ can be 10 or any real number smaller than 10. Includes the value 10. |
$\ne$ | Not equal to | $z \ne 0$ | $z$ is any real number except 0. This is often used in conjunction with other inequalities. |
Inequalities involving $>$ or $<$ are called strict inequalities, while those involving $\ge$ or $\le$ are called non-strict inequalities.
Properties of Inequalities
Manipulating inequalities requires understanding their properties, which dictate how the inequality sign behaves under various operations. Let $a, b, c$ be real numbers.
Addition Property
Adding the same real number $c$ to both sides of an inequality does not change the direction of the inequality sign. This is because adding a constant shifts both sides by the same amount, maintaining their relative order.
If $a > b$, then $a + c > b + c$.
If $a < b$, then $a + c < b + c$.
Similarly, if $a \ge b$, then $a + c \ge b + c$, and if $a \le b$, then $a + c \le b + c$.
Example: If $x - 5 > 2$, adding 5 to both sides gives $(x - 5) + 5 > 2 + 5$, which simplifies to $x > 7$. The inequality direction remains the same.
Subtraction Property
Subtracting the same real number $c$ from both sides of an inequality does not change the direction of the inequality sign. This is equivalent to adding $-c$.
If $a > b$, then $a - c > b - c$.
If $a < b$, then $a - c < b - c$.
This property also holds for $\ge$ and $\le$.
Example: If $y + 3 \le 8$, subtracting 3 from both sides gives $(y + 3) - 3 \le 8 - 3$, which simplifies to $y \le 5$. The inequality direction remains the same.
Multiplication and Division Properties
These properties are crucial and depend entirely on the sign of the number you are multiplying or dividing by.
Case 1: Multiplying or dividing by a positive number ($c > 0$).
If you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by the same positive real number $c$, the direction of the inequality sign remains the same. This is because scaling both sides by a positive factor maintains their relative proportion.
If $a > b$ and $c > 0$, then $ac > bc$ and $\frac{a}{c} > \frac{b}{c}$.
If $a < b$ and $c > 0$, then $ac < bc$ and $\frac{a}{c} < \frac{b}{c}$.
This property also holds for $\ge$ and $\le$.
Example: If $2x < 10$, dividing by 2 (a positive number) gives $\frac{2x}{2} < \frac{10}{2}$, which simplifies to $x < 5$. The inequality direction remains the same.
Case 2: Multiplying or dividing by a negative number ($c < 0$).
If you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by the same negative real number $c$, the direction of the inequality sign must be reversed. This is because multiplying or dividing by a negative number reflects the numbers across zero on the number line, thus reversing their order.
If $a > b$ and $c < 0$, then $ac < bc$ and $\frac{a}{c} < \frac{b}{c}$.
If $a < b$ and $c < 0$, then $ac > bc$ and $\frac{a}{c} > \frac{b}{c}$.
This property also holds for $\ge$ and $\le$ (they become $\le$ and $\ge$ respectively).
Example: If $-3x \ge 9$, dividing by -3 (a negative number) requires reversing the inequality sign: $\frac{-3x}{-3} \le \frac{9}{-3}$, which simplifies to $x \le -3$. The inequality direction is reversed.
Case 3: Multiplying or dividing by zero ($c = 0$).
Multiplication by zero on both sides results in $0 > 0$, $0 < 0$, $0 \ge 0$, or $0 \le 0$, which are either false or don't help in finding the value of a variable. Division by zero is undefined. Therefore, these operations are not used when solving inequalities involving variables.
Reciprocal Property
Taking the reciprocal ($\frac{1}{x}$) of both sides of an inequality requires careful consideration of the signs of the expressions involved.
If $a$ and $b$ are both positive or both negative (i.e., they have the same sign and are non-zero):
If $a > b$, then $\frac{1}{a} < \frac{1}{b}$. The direction of the inequality is reversed.
Examples:
If $x > 2$ (where $x$ is positive), then $\frac{1}{x} < \frac{1}{2}$.
If $y < -1$ (where $y$ is negative), then $\frac{1}{y} > \frac{1}{-1}$, i.e., $\frac{1}{y} > -1$.
If $a$ and $b$ have opposite signs (one positive, one negative):
If $a > b$, then $\frac{1}{a} > \frac{1}{b}$. The direction of the inequality remains the same. (This is because $a > 0$ and $b < 0$, so $\frac{1}{a} > 0$ and $\frac{1}{b} < 0$. Any positive number is greater than any negative number).
Example: If $x > -4$, where we know $x$ can be positive or negative. If we consider $x > 0$ and $x < 0$ separately, it becomes complex. The reciprocal property for opposite signs applies when comparing a positive and a negative number directly, e.g., $2 > -3 \implies \frac{1}{2} > \frac{1}{-3}$.
Important Note: When dealing with inequalities involving variables where the sign is unknown (e.g., $\frac{1}{x} < 5$), you cannot simply take reciprocals or multiply by the variable without considering cases for the variable being positive, negative, or zero (which is excluded). It's often safer to move all terms to one side and find a common denominator or multiply by the square of the denominator (which is always positive, provided the denominator is non-zero).
Solving Linear Inequalities
Solving a linear inequality involves finding the range (or set) of real numbers that make the inequality true. This process uses the properties discussed above to isolate the variable on one side of the inequality sign. The steps are very similar to solving linear equations, with the crucial difference being the potential reversal of the inequality sign when multiplying or dividing by a negative number.
The general approach is to:
- Simplify both sides of the inequality (remove brackets, combine like terms).
- Move all terms containing the variable to one side and constant terms to the other using addition or subtraction properties.
- Isolate the variable by multiplying or dividing by its coefficient. Remember to reverse the inequality sign if you multiply or divide by a negative number.
- Express the solution in terms of the variable, interval notation, or represent it on a number line.
Example 1. Solve $2x - 3 < 7$ for $x$ and represent the solution on a number line.
Answer:
We need to solve the inequality $2x - 3 < 7$.
Add 3 to both sides to isolate the term with $x$:
$2x - 3 + 3 < 7 + 3$
[Using Addition Property]
$2x < 10$
... (i)
Divide both sides by 2. Since 2 is positive, the inequality direction remains unchanged:
$\frac{2x}{2} < \frac{10}{2}$
[Using Multiplication/Division Property ($c>0$)]
$x < 5$
... (ii)
The solution set is $\{x \in \mathbb{R} \mid x < 5\}$. In interval notation, this is $(-\infty, 5)$.
Representation on a number line: An open circle at 5 indicates that 5 is not included. An arrow extends to the left from 5, covering all numbers less than 5.

Example 2. Solve $-4x + 5 \le 17$ for $x$ and represent the solution on a number line.
Answer:
We need to solve the inequality $-4x + 5 \le 17$.
Subtract 5 from both sides:
$-4x + 5 - 5 \le 17 - 5$
[Using Subtraction Property]
$-4x \le 12$
... (i)
Divide both sides by -4. Since -4 is negative, we must reverse the direction of the inequality:
$\frac{-4x}{-4} \ge \frac{12}{-4}$
[Dividing by negative number reverses inequality]
$x \ge -3$
... (ii)
The solution set is $\{x \in \mathbb{R} \mid x \ge -3\}$. In interval notation, this is $[-3, \infty)$.
Representation on a number line: A closed circle (or solid dot) at -3 indicates that -3 is included. An arrow extends to the right from -3, covering all numbers greater than or equal to -3.

Example 3. Solve $5x - 12 > 2x + 3$ for $x$.
Answer:
We need to solve $5x - 12 > 2x + 3$.
First, gather terms containing $x$ on one side and constant terms on the other. Subtract $2x$ from both sides:
$5x - 12 - 2x > 2x + 3 - 2x$
$3x - 12 > 3$
... (i)
Now, add 12 to both sides:
$3x - 12 + 12 > 3 + 12$
$3x > 15$
... (ii)
Divide both sides by 3. Since 3 is positive, the inequality direction remains unchanged:
$\frac{3x}{3} > \frac{15}{3}$
$x > 5$
... (iii)
The solution set is $\{x \in \mathbb{R} \mid x > 5\}$, or in interval notation, $(5, \infty)$.
Example 4. Solve $\frac{x}{3} + 4 \le \frac{1}{2}x - 1$ for $x$.
Answer:
We need to solve $\frac{x}{3} + 4 \le \frac{1}{2}x - 1$.
To clear the fractions, multiply both sides by the least common multiple (LCM) of the denominators (3 and 2), which is 6. Since 6 is positive, the inequality direction remains unchanged.
$6 \left( \frac{x}{3} + 4 \right) \le 6 \left( \frac{1}{2}x - 1 \right)$
Distribute the 6 on both sides:
$6 \times \frac{x}{3} + 6 \times 4 \le 6 \times \frac{1}{2}x - 6 \times 1$
$2x + 24 \le 3x - 6$
... (i)
Now, gather $x$ terms on one side. Subtract $2x$ from both sides:
$2x + 24 - 2x \le 3x - 6 - 2x$
$24 \le x - 6$
... (ii)
Add 6 to both sides to isolate $x$:
$24 + 6 \le x - 6 + 6$
$30 \le x$
... (iii)
This is equivalent to $x \ge 30$.
The solution set is $\{x \in \mathbb{R} \mid x \ge 30\}$, or in interval notation, $[30, \infty)$.
Compound Inequalities
A compound inequality consists of two or more inequalities joined by the words "and" or "or".
"And" inequalities: These represent the intersection of the solution sets of the individual inequalities. A common form is $a < x < b$, which means $a < x$ AND $x < b$. To solve, you can often work with all three parts simultaneously, applying operations to all parts to isolate the variable in the middle. Remember that the order of the numbers in the inequality ($a < b$) must be maintained.
"Or" inequalities: These represent the union of the solution sets of the individual inequalities. To solve, you solve each inequality separately and then combine their solution sets.
Example 5. Solve the compound inequality $-5 \le 2x + 1 < 7$ for $x$ and represent the solution on a number line.
Answer:
We need to solve the compound inequality $-5 \le 2x + 1 < 7$. This means we need to find values of $x$ that satisfy both $-5 \le 2x + 1$ AND $2x + 1 < 7$ simultaneously.
We can solve this by performing the same operations on all three parts of the inequality to isolate $x$ in the middle.
Subtract 1 from all three parts:
$-5 - 1 \le 2x + 1 - 1 < 7 - 1$
[Using Subtraction Property]
$-6 \le 2x < 6$
... (i)
Divide all three parts by 2. Since 2 is positive, the inequality directions remain unchanged:
$\frac{-6}{2} \le \frac{2x}{2} < \frac{6}{2}$
[Using Multiplication/Division Property ($c>0$)]
$-3 \le x < 3$
... (ii)
The solution set is $\{x \in \mathbb{R} \mid -3 \le x < 3\}$. In interval notation, this is $[-3, 3)$.
Representation on a number line: A closed circle (or solid dot) at -3 indicates that -3 is included. An open circle at 3 indicates that 3 is not included. A solid line segment connects the two circles, showing that all numbers between -3 and 3 are included.

Example 6. Solve the compound inequality $3x - 2 < 4$ or $4x + 5 > 17$ for $x$.
Answer:
We need to solve the compound inequality $3x - 2 < 4$ or $4x + 5 > 17$. This means we need to find values of $x$ that satisfy either the first inequality or the second inequality (or both).
Solve the first inequality:
$3x - 2 < 4$
Add 2 to both sides:
$3x < 6$
Divide by 3 (positive):
$x < 2$
... (i)
The solution set for the first inequality is $(-\infty, 2)$.
Solve the second inequality:
$4x + 5 > 17$
Subtract 5 from both sides:
$4x > 12$
Divide by 4 (positive):
$x > 3$
... (ii)
The solution set for the second inequality is $(3, \infty)$.
The solution to the compound inequality "$x < 2$ or $x > 3$" is the union of the two individual solution sets.
Solution Set: $\{x \in \mathbb{R} \mid x < 2 \text{ or } x > 3\}$.
In interval notation, this is $(-\infty, 2) \cup (3, \infty)$.
Representation on a number line: An open circle at 2 with an arrow to the left, AND an open circle at 3 with an arrow to the right. The solution consists of the two separate shaded regions.

Intervals
The solution sets of inequalities are typically expressed as intervals on the real number line. Interval notation is a concise way to represent these sets.
Inequality | Interval Notation | Description | Number Line Representation (example) |
---|---|---|---|
$a < x < b$ | $(a, b)$ | Open interval: All real numbers $x$ such that $x$ is strictly between $a$ and $b$. Endpoints $a$ and $b$ are not included. |
![]() |
$a \le x \le b$ | $[a, b]$ | Closed interval: All real numbers $x$ such that $x$ is between $a$ and $b$, including $a$ and $b$. Endpoints $a$ and $b$ are included. |
![]() |
$a \le x < b$ | $[a, b)$ | Half-open/half-closed interval: All real numbers $x$ such that $x$ is between $a$ and $b$, including $a$ but not $b$. |
![]() |
$a < x \le b$ | $(a, b]$ | Half-open/half-closed interval: All real numbers $x$ such that $x$ is between $a$ and $b$, including $b$ but not $a$. |
![]() |
$x > a$ | $(a, \infty)$ | Unbounded interval: All real numbers $x$ strictly greater than $a$. The interval extends infinitely to the right. $a$ is not included. |
![]() |
$x \ge a$ | $[a, \infty)$ | Unbounded interval: All real numbers $x$ greater than or equal to $a$. The interval extends infinitely to the right. $a$ is included. |
![]() |
$x < a$ | $(-\infty, a)$ | Unbounded interval: All real numbers $x$ strictly less than $a$. The interval extends infinitely to the left. $a$ is not included. |
![]() |
$x \le a$ | $(-\infty, a]$ | Unbounded interval: All real numbers $x$ less than or equal to $a$. The interval extends infinitely to the left. $a$ is included. |
![]() |
All real numbers | $(-\infty, \infty)$ or $\mathbb{R}$ | The set of all real numbers. The entire number line. |
![]() |
Parentheses $(\ )$ are always used with $\infty$ or $-\infty$ because they are symbols representing unboundedness, not actual numbers that can be included as endpoints. Parentheses are also used for endpoints in strict inequalities ($>$ or $<$). Square brackets $[\ ]$ are used for finite endpoints that are included in the interval (in non-strict inequalities $\ge$ or $\le$).