Menu Top
MCQ Questions - Topic-wise
Topic 1: Numbers & Numerical Applications Topic 2: Algebra Topic 3: Quantitative Aptitude
Topic 4: Geometry Topic 5: Construction Topic 6: Coordinate Geometry
Topic 7: Mensuration Topic 8: Trigonometry Topic 9: Sets, Relations & Functions
Topic 10: Calculus Topic 11: Mathematical Reasoning Topic 12: Vectors & Three-Dimensional Geometry
Topic 13: Linear Programming Topic 14: Index Numbers & Time-Based Data Topic 15: Financial Mathematics
Topic 16: Statistics & Probability


Matching Items MCQs for Sub-Topics of Topic 11: Mathematical Reasoning
Content On This Page
Statements and Propositions: Fundamentals Negation and Compound Statements Logical Connectives and Their Truth Tables
Conditional and Biconditional Statements Related Conditional Statements Quantifiers and Statements involving Quantifiers
Analyzing Compound Statements: Truth Tables and Classification Validating Statements and Introduction to Proofs


Matching Items MCQs for Sub-Topics of Topic 11: Mathematical Reasoning



Statements and Propositions: Fundamentals

Question 1. Match the description in List I with the concept in List II.

(i) A declarative sentence that is either true or false.

(ii) A sentence whose truth value depends on a variable.

(iii) The property of being true or false.

(iv) A sentence that is a command or question.

(v) A sentence that is both true and false simultaneously.

(a) Truth Value

(b) Not a Proposition

(c) Paradoxical Sentence

(d) Proposition

(e) Open Sentence

Answer:

Question 2. Match the sentence type in List I with the example in List II.

(i) Proposition (True)

(ii) Proposition (False)

(iii) Open Sentence

(iv) Imperative Sentence

(v) Interrogative Sentence

(a) What is your age?

(b) The capital of Maharashtra is Mumbai.

(c) $x^2 = 9$

(d) $5 + 2 = 8$

(e) Please be quiet.

Answer:

Question 3. Match the mathematical concept in List I with its property or definition in List II.

(i) Definition of a Proposition

(ii) Truth value of "$1+1=3$"

(iii) Open Sentence example

(iv) Truth value of "All prime numbers are odd"

(v) Nature of "This statement is false"

(a) False

(b) Paradox

(c) Declarative and has a definite truth value

(d) True

(e) $x$ is positive

Answer:

Question 4. Match the statement type in List I with the characteristic in List II.

(i) Mathematical Statement

(ii) Non-statement

(iii) True Statement

(iv) False Statement

(v) Sentence with a variable.

(a) Has a definite truth value

(b) Truth value is False

(c) Cannot be assigned True or False

(d) Truth value is True

(e) Open sentence

Answer:

Question 5. Match the sentence in List I with its classification in List II.

(i) Are you feeling well?

(ii) Every even number greater than 2 is the sum of two primes (Goldbach's Conjecture).

(iii) $3x - 7 = 5$

(iv) The Earth is a perfect sphere.

(v) Stop the car!

(a) Open Sentence

(b) Proposition with unknown truth value

(c) Interrogative Sentence

(d) Imperative Sentence

(e) Proposition (False)

Answer:



Negation and Compound Statements

Question 1. Match the statement in List I with its correct negation in List II.

(i) The door is open.

(ii) All students passed.

(iii) Some apples are red.

(iv) $x = 5$

(v) The number is positive.

(a) Some students did not pass.

(b) The number is not positive (i.e., zero or negative).

(c) The door is not open.

(d) $x \neq 5$

(e) No apples are red (or All apples are not red).

Answer:

Question 2. Match the description in List I with the concept/symbol in List II.

(i) Reverses the truth value of a statement.

(ii) Combines two or more simple statements.

(iii) Symbol for negation.

(iv) Example of a simple statement.

(v) Example of a compound statement.

(a) $\neg$

(b) Negation

(c) The sky is blue and the grass is green.

(d) The Sun is a star.

(e) Compound Statement

Answer:

Question 3. Match the compound statement in List I with its simplified form/property using negation (assuming $p$ is a statement).

(i) $\neg (\neg p)$

(ii) Statement and its negation.

(iii) Negation symbol.

(iv) $\neg (p \land q)$

(v) $\neg (p \lor q)$

(a) $\neg p \land \neg q$

(b) $\sim$

(c) Always false (contradiction).

(d) $\neg p \lor \neg q$

(e) $p$

Answer:

Question 4. Match the statement structure in List I with its negation structure in List II.

(i) $p \land q$

(ii) $p \lor q$

(iii) All X are Y.

(iv) Some X are Y.

(v) No X are Y.

(a) Some X are not Y.

(b) Some X are Y.

(c) $\neg p \lor \neg q$

(d) $\neg p \land \neg q$

(e) All X are not Y (or No X are Y).

Answer:

Question 5. Match the statement with its negation in List II.

(i) The number is even and prime.

(ii) The book is interesting or long.

(iii) Every student is present.

(iv) There is a solution.

(v) $a > b$

(a) There is no solution.

(b) Some student is not present.

(c) $a \leq b$

(d) The number is not even or not prime.

(e) The book is not interesting and not long.

Answer:



Logical Connectives and Their Truth Tables

Question 1. Match the logical connective symbol in List I with its name and function in List II.

(i) $\land$

(ii) $\lor$

(iii) $\neg$

(iv) $p \land q$ truth condition

(v) $p \lor q$ (inclusive) truth condition

(a) True if at least one is true.

(b) Conjunction (AND)

(c) Negation (NOT)

(d) Disjunction (OR)

(e) True only if both are true.

Answer:

Question 2. Match the truth value combination for $p, q$ in List I with the truth value of the compound statement in List II.

(i) $p$ True, $q$ True

(ii) $p$ True, $q$ False

(iii) $p$ False, $q$ True

(iv) $p$ False, $q$ False

(v) $p$ True

(a) $\neg p$ is False

(b) $p \land q$ is False

(c) $p \lor q$ is True

(d) $p \land q$ is True

(e) $p \lor q$ is False

Answer:

Question 3. Match the type of truth table column in List I with the property in List II (based on the number of simple propositions). For $n$ simple propositions.

(i) Number of rows

(ii) Column for $p \land \neg p$

(iii) Column for $p \lor \neg p$

(iv) Exclusive OR ($p \oplus q$) is true

(v) Column for $\neg p$

(a) All False

(b) All True

(c) $2^n$

(d) When $p$ and $q$ have different truth values.

(e) Opposite of $p$'s column.

Answer:

Question 4. Match the English phrase in List I with the corresponding logical connective symbol in List II.

(i) "and"

(ii) "or"

(iii) "not"

(iv) "neither... nor..." ($p$ and $q$)

(v) "but"

(a) $\land$

(b) $\neg p \land \neg q$

(c) $\lor$

(d) $\neg$

(e) $\land$ (typically)

Answer:

Question 5. Match the compound statement with its truth value, given $p$ is True and $q$ is False.

(i) $p \land q$

(ii) $p \lor q$

(iii) $\neg p \land q$

(iv) $\neg (p \lor q)$

(v) $\neg (\neg p \land \neg q)$

(a) True

(b) False

(c) True (as $\neg p$ is False, $\neg q$ is True, $\neg p \land \neg q$ is False, negation is True)

(d) False (as $p \lor q$ is True, negation is False)

(e) False (as $\neg p$ is False, $\neg p \land q$ is False)

Answer:



Conditional and Biconditional Statements

Question 1. Match the statement form in List I with its name in List II.

(i) $p \implies q$

(ii) $p \iff q$

(iii) The 'if' part of $p \implies q$

(iv) The 'then' part of $p \implies q$

(v) $p$ is a necessary condition for $q$

(a) Consequent

(b) Antecedent

(c) Conditional Statement

(d) $q \implies p$

(e) Biconditional Statement

Answer:

Question 2. Match the truth value combination for $p, q$ in List I with the truth value of $p \implies q$ in List II.

(i) $p$ True, $q$ True

(ii) $p$ True, $q$ False

(iii) $p$ False, $q$ True

(iv) $p$ False, $q$ False

(v) $p \implies q$ is false

(a) True

(b) False

(c) Occurs only when $p$ is True and $q$ is False.

(d) True

(e) True

Answer:

Question 3. Match the condition for truth in List I with the statement type in List II.

(i) True when antecedent and consequent have the same truth value.

(ii) True only when antecedent is true and consequent is true.

(iii) False only when antecedent is true and consequent is false.

(iv) True when antecedent is true and consequent is false.

(v) True when at least one component is true.

(a) Conjunction ($p \land q$)

(b) $p \implies q$

(c) $p \iff q$

(d) $p \land \neg q$

(e) Disjunction ($p \lor q$)

Answer:

Question 4. Match the statement in List I with its logical form in List II. Let $p$: "You study", $q$: "You pass".

(i) If you study, then you pass.

(ii) You pass if and only if you study.

(iii) You study only if you pass.

(iv) You pass if you study.

(v) Studying is sufficient for passing.

(a) $p \iff q$

(b) $p \implies q$

(c) $q \implies p$

(d) $p \implies q$

(e) $p \implies q$

Answer:

Question 5. Match the description/condition in List I with the statement type in List II.

(i) Necessary condition for $q$

(ii) Sufficient condition for $q$

(iii) Necessary and sufficient condition for $q$

(iv) Implication

(v) Equivalence

(a) $p \iff q$

(b) $p \implies q$

(c) $p$ in $p \implies q$

(d) $p \implies q$

(e) $p \iff q$

Answer:



Related Conditional Statements

Question 1. Given the conditional statement $p \implies q$, match the related statement in List I with its form in List II.

(i) Converse

(ii) Inverse

(iii) Contrapositive

(iv) Original Statement

(v) Negation of the original statement

(a) $\neg p \implies \neg q$

(b) $p \implies q$

(c) $q \implies p$

(d) $p \land \neg q$

(e) $\neg q \implies \neg p$

Answer:

Question 2. Match the pair of statements in List I with their logical relationship in List II.

(i) $p \implies q$ and $q \implies p$

(ii) $p \implies q$ and $\neg p \implies \neg q$

(iii) $p \implies q$ and $\neg q \implies \neg p$

(iv) $q \implies p$ and $\neg p \implies \neg q$

(v) $p \implies q$ and $p \land \neg q$

(a) Inverse pair (logically equivalent)

(b) Contrapositive pair (logically equivalent)

(c) Converse pair (not logically equivalent)

(d) A statement and its negation (logically opposite)

(e) Converse and Inverse (logically equivalent)

Answer:

Question 3. Consider the statement "If a quadrilateral is a square, then it is a rhombus". Match the related statement in List I with its English form in List II.

(i) Converse

(ii) Inverse

(iii) Contrapositive

(iv) Original Statement

(v) Negation

(a) If a quadrilateral is not a square, then it is not a rhombus.

(b) A quadrilateral is a square and it is not a rhombus.

(c) If a quadrilateral is a rhombus, then it is a square.

(d) If a quadrilateral is a square, then it is a rhombus.

(e) If a quadrilateral is not a rhombus, then it is not a square.

Answer:

Question 4. If the original conditional statement $p \implies q$ is true, match the truth value of the related statement in List II.

(i) Converse ($q \implies p$)

(ii) Inverse ($\neg p \implies \neg q$)

(iii) Contrapositive ($\neg q \implies \neg p$)

(iv) Negation ($p \land \neg q$)

(v) Biconditional ($p \iff q$)

(a) True

(b) False

(c) May be True or False

(d) True

(e) May be True or False

Answer:

Question 5. Match the relationship description in List I with the related statement pair in List II (for $p \implies q$).

(i) Logically equivalent to the original.

(ii) Formed by swapping antecedent and consequent.

(iii) Formed by negating antecedent and consequent.

(iv) Formed by swapping and negating antecedent and consequent.

(v) Logically equivalent to the converse.

(a) Inverse ($\neg p \implies \neg q$)

(b) Contrapositive ($\neg q \implies \neg p$)

(c) Converse ($q \implies p$)

(d) Contrapositive ($\neg q \implies \neg p$)

(e) Inverse ($\neg p \implies \neg q$)

Answer:



Quantifiers and Statements involving Quantifiers

Question 1. Match the symbol/phrase in List I with the type of quantifier in List II.

(i) $\forall$

(ii) "There exists"

(iii) "Every"

(iv) $\exists$

(v) "For all"

(a) Universal Quantifier

(b) Existential Quantifier

(c) Existential Quantifier

(d) Universal Quantifier

(e) Universal Quantifier

Answer:

Question 2. Match the statement in List I with its negation in List II.

(i) All students are tall.

(ii) Some cars are blue.

(iii) No birds can swim.

(iv) Every dog can bark.

(v) There exists a number $x$ such that $x^2 < 0$.

(a) Some birds can swim.

(b) Some cars are not blue.

(c) There exists a dog that cannot bark.

(d) For every number $x$, $x^2 \geq 0$.

(e) Some students are not tall.

Answer:

Question 3. Match the symbolic form in List I with the English statement in List II. Let $P(x)$ be "$x$ is a cat" and $Q(x)$ be "$x$ is black".

(i) $\forall x, P(x) \implies Q(x)$

(ii) $\exists x, P(x) \land Q(x)$

(iii) $\forall x, P(x) \land Q(x)$

(iv) $\exists x, P(x) \land \neg Q(x)$

(v) $\forall x, P(x)$

(a) All cats are black.

(b) There exists a cat that is not black (Some cats are not black).

(c) Some cats are black.

(d) Everything is a black cat.

(e) Everything is a cat.

Answer:

Question 4. Match the negation rule in List I with its form in List II.

(i) Negation of $\forall x, P(x)$

(ii) Negation of $\exists x, P(x)$

(iii) Negation of "All X are Y"

(iv) Negation of "Some X are Y"

(v) Negation of "No X are Y"

(a) Some X are not Y.

(b) All X are not Y (or No X are Y).

(c) $\exists x, \neg P(x)$

(d) Some X are Y.

(e) $\forall x, \neg P(x)$

Answer:

Question 5. Match the statement property in List I with the type of quantifier used in List II.

(i) Statement asserting a property holds for every element.

(ii) Statement asserting a property holds for at least one element.

(iii) Used in proving existence.

(iv) Used in disproving universal statements by counterexample.

(v) Used in proving properties across a domain.

(a) Universal Quantifier ($\forall$)

(b) Existential Quantifier ($\exists$)

(c) Existential Quantifier ($\exists$)

(d) Existential Quantifier ($\exists$)

(e) Universal Quantifier ($\forall$)

Answer:



Analyzing Compound Statements: Truth Tables and Classification

Question 1. Match the description in List I with the type of compound statement in List II.

(i) Always true.

(ii) Always false.

(iii) Sometimes true, sometimes false.

(iv) $P \iff Q$ is a tautology.

(v) $\neg S$ is a tautology where $S$ is the given statement.

(a) Logical Equivalence

(b) Contradiction

(c) Contingency

(d) Tautology

(e) Contradiction

Answer:

Question 2. Match the compound statement in List I with its classification in List II.

(i) $p \lor \neg p$

(ii) $p \land \neg p$

(iii) $p \implies p$

(iv) $(p \land q) \lor r$

(v) $\neg (p \implies q) \iff (p \land \neg q)$

(a) Contingency

(b) Tautology

(c) Tautology

(d) Contradiction

(e) Tautology (since $\neg (p \implies q)$ is logically equivalent to $p \land \neg q$, the biconditional is always true)

Answer:

Question 3. Match the statement form in List I with the logically equivalent form in List II (using De Morgan's Laws and Implication equivalence).

(i) $\neg (p \land q)$

(ii) $\neg (p \lor q)$

(iii) $p \implies q$

(iv) $\neg (\neg p)$

(v) $p \iff q$

(a) $\neg p \lor \neg q$

(b) $(p \implies q) \land (q \implies p)$

(c) $p$

(d) $\neg p \land \neg q$

(e) $\neg p \lor q$

Answer:

Question 4. Match the property of logical equivalence in List I with the corresponding law name in List II.

(i) $p \land (q \lor r) \equiv (p \land q) \lor (p \land r)$

(ii) $p \lor (p \land q) \equiv p$

(iii) $\neg (p \land q) \equiv \neg p \lor \neg q$

(iv) $p \land \text{True} \equiv p$

(v) $p \land q \equiv q \land p$

(a) Commutative Law

(b) Absorption Law

(c) Identity Law

(d) De Morgan's Law

(e) Distributive Law

Answer:

Question 5. Match the number of simple propositions in List I with the required number of rows in the truth table for a compound statement in List II.

(i) 1

(ii) 2

(iii) 3

(iv) 4

(v) $n$

(a) 16

(b) 8

(c) 2

(d) 4

(e) $2^n$

Answer:



Validating Statements and Introduction to Proofs

Question 1. Match the proof method in List I with its general approach in List II.

(i) Direct Proof of $P \implies Q$

(ii) Proof by Contrapositive of $P \implies Q$

(iii) Proof by Contradiction of $P$

(iv) Proof by Contradiction of $P \implies Q$

(v) Validating a universally quantified statement $\forall x, P(x)$

(a) Assume $\neg (P \implies Q)$ and derive a contradiction.

(b) Assume $P$ and deduce $Q$.

(c) Assume $\neg P$ and derive a contradiction.

(d) Assume $\neg Q$ and deduce $\neg P$.

(e) Prove $P(x)$ for an arbitrary element $x$ in the domain.

Answer:

Question 2. Match the argument form in List I with its description/validity in List II.

(i) Modus Ponens

(ii) Modus Tollens

(iii) Fallacy of the Converse

(iv) Fallacy of the Inverse

(v) A valid argument

(a) $(p \implies q) \land \neg p \implies \neg q$ (Invalid)

(b) $(p \implies q) \land p \implies q$ (Valid)

(c) The conclusion logically follows from the premises.

(d) $(p \implies q) \land \neg q \implies \neg p$ (Valid)

(e) $(p \implies q) \land q \implies p$ (Invalid)

Answer:

Question 3. Match the mathematical statement property in List I with the requirement for its proof/disproof in List II.

(i) Proving $\forall x, P(x)$

(ii) Disproving $\forall x, P(x)$

(iii) Proving $\exists x, P(x)$

(iv) Disproving $\exists x, P(x)$

(v) Valid argument

(a) Prove $\forall x, \neg P(x)$.

(b) Find at least one $x_0$ such that $\neg P(x_0)$ is true (counterexample).

(c) Show that the premises logically imply the conclusion.

(d) Prove $P(x)$ for a generic $x$ in the domain.

(e) Find at least one $x_0$ such that $P(x_0)$ is true (example).

Answer:

Question 4. Match the proof-related concept in List I with its meaning or application in List II.

(i) Valid argument

(ii) Sound argument

(iii) Counterexample

(iv) Role of contradiction in proof by contradiction

(v) Starting point for proof of $P \implies Q$ by contrapositive

(a) A specific case that shows a universal statement is false.

(b) Implies the assumption leading to it must be false.

(c) The premises imply the conclusion.

(d) Assume $\neg Q$.

(e) A valid argument with true premises.

Answer:

Question 5. Match the statement requiring proof in List I with a suitable proof method in List II.

(i) If $n^2$ is odd, then $n$ is odd.

(ii) The sum of any two rational numbers is rational.

(iii) $\sqrt{2}$ is irrational.

(iv) There are infinitely many prime numbers.

(v) If $p \implies q$ and $q \implies r$, then $p \implies r$.

(a) Direct Proof (using properties of rational numbers)

(b) Proof by Contradiction

(c) Proof by Contrapositive (or Direct Proof by considering odd squares)

(d) Proof by Contradiction

(e) Proved using a truth table (or Hypothetical Syllogism)

Answer: