Non-Rationalised Science NCERT Notes and Solutions (Class 6th to 10th) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | ||||||||||
Non-Rationalised Science NCERT Notes and Solutions (Class 11th) | ||||||||||||||
Physics | Chemistry | Biology | ||||||||||||
Non-Rationalised Science NCERT Notes and Solutions (Class 12th) | ||||||||||||||
Physics | Chemistry | Biology |
Chapter 12 Organic Chemistry – Some Basic Principles And Techniques
General Introduction
Organic chemistry is the study of carbon-containing compounds. Carbon is unique due to its ability to form strong covalent bonds with other carbon atoms (catenation) and with various other elements like hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus, and halogens. Organic compounds are fundamental to life (DNA, proteins) and everyday materials (fuels, plastics, medicines).
The field of organic chemistry developed historically from studying compounds derived from living organisms. Initially, it was believed that a 'vital force' was necessary for their formation. However, this idea was disproven by scientists like F. Wohler (synthesis of urea from inorganic ammonium cyanate in 1828), Kolbe (acetic acid synthesis in 1845), and Berthelot (methane synthesis in 1856), who showed that organic compounds could be synthesized in the laboratory from inorganic precursors.
The development of electronic theory of covalent bonding in the early 20th century provided a scientific foundation for organic chemistry.
Tetravalence Of Carbon: Shapes Of Organic Compounds
Carbon is tetravalent, forming four covalent bonds. The shapes of simple organic molecules like methane (CH$_4$), ethene (C$_2$H$_4$), and ethyne (C$_2$H$_2$) are explained by the hybridization of carbon's atomic orbitals (sp$^3$, sp$^2$, and sp, respectively).
The Shapes Of Carbon Compounds
- In **methane (CH$_4$)**, the carbon is sp$^3$ hybridized and forms four sigma ($\sigma$) bonds with hydrogen atoms. The molecule has a **tetrahedral** shape with bond angles of 109.5$^\circ$.
- In **ethene (C$_2$H$_4$)**, each carbon is sp$^2$ hybridized, forming three $\sigma$ bonds (one C-C, two C-H) and one pi ($\pi$) bond (C=C). The atoms around each carbon lie in a single plane, resulting in a **trigonal planar** geometry around each carbon and a **planar** molecule overall. The bond angles around each carbon are approximately 120$^\circ$.
- In **ethyne (C$_2$H$_2$)**, each carbon is sp hybridized, forming two $\sigma$ bonds (one C-C, one C-H) and two $\pi$ bonds (C$\equiv$C). The molecule is **linear** with bond angles of 180$^\circ$.
Hybridization affects bond properties: sp hybrid orbitals (50% s character) are closer to the nucleus, forming shorter and stronger bonds than sp$^2$ (33% s character) or sp$^3$ (25% s character) hybrid orbitals. Electronegativity of carbon also increases with s character (sp > sp$^2$ > sp$^3$).
Some Characteristic Features Of P Bonds
A $\pi$ bond is formed by the sideways overlap of two parallel p-orbitals on adjacent atoms. For maximum overlap, the atoms involved in the $\pi$ bond and the atoms directly attached to them must lie in the same plane. Rotation around a double bond is restricted because it would break the $\pi$ overlap.
The electron cloud of a $\pi$ bond is located above and below the plane of the sigma bond. $\pi$ bonds are typically weaker than $\sigma$ bonds but are more exposed, making them reactive sites in molecules with multiple bonds.
Problem 12.1. How many and bonds are present in each of the following molecules? (a) HC CCH=CHCH$_3$ (b) CH$_2$=C=CHCH$_3$
Answer:
To count the number of $\sigma$ and $\pi$ bonds, we need to draw the complete structural formula showing all single, double, and triple bonds, and all atoms.
Remember that a single bond is a $\sigma$ bond, a double bond is one $\sigma$ and one $\pi$ bond, and a triple bond is one $\sigma$ and two $\pi$ bonds.
(a) HC $\equiv$ C – CH = CH – CH$_3$
Complete structure:
H – C $\equiv$ C – C = C – CH$_3$
| |
H H$_2$ (This is incorrect, should be H and CH3 group)
Correct structure based on the given formula: H – C $\equiv$ C – C = C – C – H
| | | |
H H H H
The formula is HC$\equiv$CCH=CHCH$_3$. Let's draw it carefully:
H – C $\equiv$ C – C = C – C – H
| | | |
H H H$_3$ (This structure is wrong based on valency)
Let's use the carbon numbering implied by the condensed formula:
C1C2C3C4C5C6
HC$^1\equiv$C$^2$–C$^3$H=C$^4$H–C$^5$H$_2$–C$^6$H$_3$ (This uses too many carbons/hydrogens)
Let's re-read the formula: HC$\equiv$C-CH=CH-CH$_3$. This has 5 carbon atoms.
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
H-C$^1\equiv$C$^2$-C$^3$H=C$^4$H-C$^5$H$_3$. Let's check valencies:
C1: 1 (to H) + 3 (to C2) = 4 (correct)
C2: 3 (to C1) + 1 (to C3) = 4 (correct)
C3: 1 (to C2) + 1 (to H) + 2 (to C4) = 4 (correct)
C4: 2 (to C3) + 1 (to H) + 1 (to C5) = 4 (correct)
C5: 1 (to C4) + 3 (to H) = 4 (correct)
So the structure is: H – C $\equiv$ C – C = C – CH$_3$
| |
H H
Count $\sigma$ bonds: Count all single bonds + one bond in each double/triple bond.
C1-H ($\sigma$), C1-C2 ($\sigma$), C2-C3 ($\sigma$), C3-H ($\sigma$), C3-C4 ($\sigma$), C4-H ($\sigma$), C4-C5 ($\sigma$), C5-H$_3$ (3 $\sigma$).
Total $\sigma$ bonds = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 3 = 10.
Count $\pi$ bonds: Count one bond in each double bond + two bonds in each triple bond.
C1$\equiv$C2 (2 $\pi$), C3=C4 (1 $\pi$).
Total $\pi$ bonds = 2 + 1 = 3.
(a) HC$\equiv$CCH=CHCH$_3$: **10 sigma bonds, 3 pi bonds.**
(b) CH$_2$=C=CHCH$_3$. This is a cumulene (two adjacent double bonds). 4 carbon atoms.
C1 C2 C3 C4
CH$_2$=C=CH-CH$_3$. Let's check valencies:
C1: 2 (to H) + 2 (to C2) = 4 (correct)
C2: 2 (to C1) + 2 (to C3) = 4 (correct)
C3: 2 (to C2) + 1 (to H) + 1 (to C4) = 4 (correct)
C4: 1 (to C3) + 3 (to H) = 4 (correct)
So the structure is: H$_2$C = C = CH – CH$_3$
Count $\sigma$ bonds:
C1-H$_2$ (2 $\sigma$), C1-C2 ($\sigma$), C2-C3 ($\sigma$), C3-H ($\sigma$), C3-C4 ($\sigma$), C4-H$_3$ (3 $\sigma$).
Total $\sigma$ bonds = 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 3 = 9.
Count $\pi$ bonds:
C1=C2 (1 $\pi$), C2=C3 (1 $\pi$).
Total $\pi$ bonds = 1 + 1 = 2.
(b) CH$_2$=C=CHCH$_3$: **9 sigma bonds, 2 pi bonds.**
(My calculation for (a) differs from the provided solution - provided solution says 4 C-C sigma, 6 C-H sigma, 1 C=C pi, 2 C triple C pi. 4+6 = 10 sigma, 1+2 = 3 pi. Ah, the provided solution broke down the sigma bonds by type. My total sigma and pi count matches. Let's break down sigma bonds for (b) as well.)
(b) CH$_2$=C=CHCH$_3$: C1-H (2 $\sigma$), C3-H (1 $\sigma$), C4-H (3 $\sigma$). Total C-H $\sigma$ = 2 + 1 + 3 = 6. C1-C2 ($\sigma$), C2-C3 ($\sigma$), C3-C4 ($\sigma$). Total C-C $\sigma$ = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3. Total $\sigma$ = 6 + 3 = 9. Total $\pi$ = 1 (C1=C2) + 1 (C2=C3) = 2.
So my calculation is consistent. The provided solution for (a) has 4 C-C sigma bonds. Let's check the structure again: H-C$^1\equiv$C$^2$-C$^3$H=C$^4$H-C$^5$H$_3$. C1-C2 ($\sigma$), C2-C3 ($\sigma$), C3-C4 ($\sigma$), C4-C5 ($\sigma$). There are 4 C-C sigma bonds. C1-H ($\sigma$), C3-H ($\sigma$), C4-H ($\sigma$), C5-H$_3$ (3 $\sigma$). Total C-H $\sigma$ = 1+1+1+3 = 6. Total sigma = 4+6 = 10. Pi bonds = 2 (triple) + 1 (double) = 3. Okay, my breakdown and total matches the provided solution.
Structural Representations Of Organic Compounds
The structures of organic compounds can be represented in various ways to show connectivity and arrangement of atoms.
Complete, Condensed And Bond-line Structural Formulas
- **Complete Structural Formula:** Shows all atoms and all covalent bonds using dashes (single bond = one dash, double bond = two dashes, triple bond = three dashes). Lone pairs on heteroatoms may or may not be shown.
- **Condensed Structural Formula:** Omits some or all dashes and indicates the number of identical groups attached to an atom using subscripts. Chains of CH$_2$ groups are often condensed further (e.g., (CH$_2$)$_n$).
- **Bond-line Structural Formula (Skeletal Structure):** A simplified representation where carbon and hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon are not explicitly shown. Carbon atoms are implied at the junctions of lines and at the ends of lines. Lines represent carbon-carbon bonds, drawn in a zig-zag manner. Hydrogen atoms attached to carbon are assumed to be present in sufficient number to satisfy carbon's valency (4). Heteroatoms (like O, N, S, halogens) and hydrogens bonded to heteroatoms are shown explicitly.
Examples:
Ethane (C$_2$H$_6$)
- Complete: H–H$_3$C – CH$_3$
- Condensed: CH$_3$CH$_3$
- Bond-line: \\
Ethene (C$_2$H$_4$)
- Complete: H$_2$C=CH$_2$
- Condensed: CH$_2$=CH$_2$
- Bond-line: \
Ethyne (C$_2$H$_2$)
- Complete: HC$\equiv$CH
- Condensed: HC$\equiv$CH
- Bond-line: —
Cyclic compounds in bond-line formula are represented by polygons.
Problem 12.4. Expand each of the following condensed formulas into their complete structural formulas. (a) CH$_3$CH$_2$COCH$_2$CH$_3$ (b) CH$_3$CH=CH(CH$_2$)$_3$CH$_3$
Answer:
To expand a condensed formula, show all atoms and bonds explicitly, ensuring each carbon has 4 bonds and each hydrogen has 1 bond.
(a) CH$_3$CH$_2$COCH$_2$CH$_3$. This contains a ketone group (>C=O). Let's break it down:
- CH$_3$: A methyl group, CH$_3$–. It's connected to the next carbon.
- CH$_2$: A methylene group, –CH$_2$–. Connected to carbon before and after it.
- CO: A carbonyl group, >C=O. The carbon is double bonded to oxygen. It's also connected to the carbons on either side.
- CH$_2$: Another methylene group, –CH$_2$–.
- CH$_3$: Another methyl group, –CH$_3$.
Putting it together:
H H O H H
| | // | |
H–C–C–C–C–C–H
| | \ | |
H H H H H
This is incorrect based on the formula grouping. The formula is CH$_3$CH$_2$COCH$_2$CH$_3$. The CO represents the carbonyl carbon bonded to the CH$_2$ on its left and the CH$_2$ on its right.
Structure:
H H O H H
| | // | |
H—C—C—C—C—C—H
| | \ | |
H H H H
Let's count carbons to be sure: 1 2 3 4 5. It's Pentan-3-one.
Correct structure for (a):
H H O H H
| | // | |
H—C—C—C—C—C—H
| | | |
H H H H
(b) CH$_3$CH=CH(CH$_2$)$_3$CH$_3$. Let's break it down:
- CH$_3$: Methyl group, CH$_3$–.
- CH= : A carbon double bonded to the next carbon and bonded to one hydrogen, –CH= .
- =CH : A carbon double bonded to the previous carbon and bonded to one hydrogen, =CH–.
- (CH$_2$)$_3$: Three repeating methylene groups, –(CH$_2$)$_3$–. This expands to –CH$_2$–CH$_2$–CH$_2$–.
- CH$_3$: Methyl group, –CH$_3$.
Putting it together: CH$_3$–CH=CH–CH$_2$–CH$_2$–CH$_2$–CH$_3$. Let's check valencies:
C1 (CH$_3$): 1 + 3 = 4 (correct)
C2 (CH=): 1 + 1 + 2 = 4 (correct)
C3 (=CH): 2 + 1 + 1 = 4 (correct)
C4 (CH$_2$): 1 + 2 + 1 = 4 (correct)
C5 (CH$_2$): 1 + 2 + 1 = 4 (correct)
C6 (CH$_2$): 1 + 2 + 1 = 4 (correct)
C7 (CH$_3$): 1 + 3 = 4 (correct)
So the structure is CH$_3$–CH=CH–CH$_2$–CH$_2$–CH$_2$–CH$_3$. This is Hept-2-ene.
Correct structure for (b):
H H H H H H H H
| | | | | | | |
H—C—C=C—C—C—C—C—H
| | | | | | | |
H H H H H H
Wait, C=C only has one H each.
Correct structure for (b):
H H H H H H H
| | | | | | |
H—C—C=C—C—C—C—C—H
| | | | | | | |
H H H H H H H
Wait, CH$_3$ is 3 hydrogens. The end CH$_3$ has 3 hydrogens.
Correct structure for (b):
H H H H H H H
| | | | | | |
H—C—C=C—C—C—C—C—H
| | | | | | | |
H H H H H H H H
Count total Hydrogens: 3 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 3 = 14. Formula is C$_7$H$_{14}$. Heptene formula is C$_7$H$_{14}$. Okay, valencies are correct. Structure is correct.
Three-Dimensional Representation Of Organic Molecules
To visualise the 3D structure of molecules on a 2D surface like paper, specific conventions are used in structural formulas:
- **Solid Wedge ( ):** Represents a bond projecting **out of the plane** of the paper towards the observer.
- **Dashed Wedge ( ):** Represents a bond projecting **into the plane** of the paper away from the observer.
- **Normal Line (—):** Represents a bond lying **in the plane** of the paper.
These are used in wedge-and-dash formulas (Fig. 12.1).
Additionally, physical **molecular models** (Framework, Ball-and-stick, Space-filling) and **computer graphics** are used for better 3D visualisation (Fig. 12.2).
Problem 12.5. For each of the following compounds, write a condensed formula and also their bond-line formula. (a) HOCH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH(CH$_3$)CH(CH$_3$)CH$_3$ (b)
Answer:
(a) HOCH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH(CH$_3$)CH(CH$_3$)CH$_3$
To write the condensed formula, group the atoms attached to each carbon and write them sequentially, omitting most bonds. Let's number the carbons from the HO end:
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
HO-CH$_2$-CH$_2$-CH$_2$-CH(CH$_3$)-CH(CH$_3$)-CH$_3$
Condensed formula: HO(CH$_2$)$_3$CH(CH$_3$)CH(CH$_3$)CH$_3$
To write the bond-line formula, show the carbon chain as zig-zag lines, and show the heteroatom (O in OH) and the methyl branches explicitly. The OH is on C1. The methyl branches are on C4 and C5.
Bond-line formula:
OH
|
1 — 2 — 3 — 4 — 5 — 6
| |
CH$_3$ CH$_3$
Drawing the zig-zag:
HO /\ /\ /\
\/ \/
| |
CH$_3$ CH$_3$ (Incorrect zig-zag, should show carbon chain)
Correct bond-line formula for (a):
OH
|
/\
/ \
\/ \/
| |
\ /
CH$_3$
Let's try drawing it step by step showing carbons implicitly:
C1-OH (shown as HO-)
C1-C2-C3-C4-C5-C6 (6 carbons in main chain)
C4 has a CH$_3$ branch.
C5 has a CH$_3$ branch.
Bond-line starts from HO, representing C1:
HO—/\/\\\
|
CH$_3$ (This represents CH(CH$_3$))
|
CH$_3$ (This represents CH(CH$_3$)$_2$ if at end)
Let's draw the main chain of 6 carbons first, then add OH and branches:
6-carbon zig-zag:
/\/\/\
OH on C1 (end): HO—/\/\/\
CH$_3$ on C4: HO—/\/\/\
|
\\
CH$_3$ on C5: HO—/\/\/\
| |
\\ //
Final bond-line formula for (a):
OH
|
/\/\/\
| |
\/ \/
This should be 6 carbons in the main chain, with OH at one end, and methyls on the 4th and 5th carbons from that end.
Let's draw 6 carbons in zig-zag:
1-2-3-4-5-6
/\/\/\
Add OH to C1: HO—/\/\/\
Add CH$_3$ to C4: HO—/\/\/\
|
\\
Add CH$_3$ to C5: HO—/\/\/\
| |
\\ //
Okay, the text's bond-line for (a) has 6 carbons in the main chain, OH at one end, and methyls on C4 and C5. This matches my interpretation.
(b)
This is a bond-line structure of a cyclic compound. It's a 6-membered ring (cyclohexane) with a methyl group branch.
Condensed formula: C$_6$H$_{11}$CH$_3$ or more specifically: Identify the ring carbons and the methyl branch. Number the carbons in the ring. It's a methylcyclohexane.
This is methylcyclohexane. The methyl group is CH$_3$. The ring is C$_6$H$_{11}$. So, C$_7$H$_{14}$ is the molecular formula. Condensed formula: **CH$_3$C$_6$H$_{11}$** (not very informative).
Let's write a slightly more expanded condensed formula showing the ring connectivity implicitly: It's a cyclohexane ring bonded to a methyl group.
Condensed formula: **(CH$_2$)$_5$CHCH$_3$** (This implies a 5-membered ring with a CH-CH3 branch on one carbon... Still not quite right.)
Let's describe the ring carbons and the methyl branch. Each carbon in the ring is a CH$_2$ except for the one bonded to the methyl group, which is a CH. The methyl group is CH$_3$. So, C$_6$H$_{11}$CH$_3$. Let's write the ring carbons more explicitly for condensed structure:
Condensed formula: **C$_6$H$_{11}$CH$_3$** or **CH$_3$C$_6$H$_{11}$** (simple way to show connectivity)
Let's consider the structure as cyclohexane ring with a methyl group substituent. We can represent the ring as (CH$_2$)$_6$ and the methyl group as CH$_3$. However, the ring has lost a hydrogen to bond to CH$_3$. So it's (CH$_2$)$_5$CH(CH$_3$) or related structure depending on isomer. Here it's a cyclohexane ring, so 6 carbons. One carbon in the ring has a methyl group and one hydrogen. The other 5 carbons in the ring have 2 hydrogens each.
Condensed formula: **C$_6$H$_{11}$CH$_3$** (molecular formula). Structural condensed formula: **C$_6$H$_{11}$CH$_3$** (not much more specific than molecular formula for a simple substituted ring).
Let's write the formula starting from one carbon in the ring: CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH(CH$_3$). This doesn't show the ring. Let's try indicating the ring:
Condensed formula: **c-C$_6$H$_{11}$CH$_3$** (c- means cyclic). Or show the carbon chain and indicate the cyclization, which is complex.
Let's go back to the principle: condense the structure. The given image is methylcyclohexane. The ring is cyclohexane. A methyl group is attached. Condensed formula: **CH$_3$(C$_6$H$_{11}$)**. This is the most common way for a simple substituted ring.
Bond-line formula: Already given. It is a hexagon representing the 6-membered ring, with a line from one vertex representing the methyl branch.
Bond-line formula: **(Given in the question)**
Problem 12.6. Expand each of the following bond-line formulas to show all the atoms including carbon and hydrogen (a) (b) (c) (d)
Answer:
To expand a bond-line formula, remember that carbon atoms are at the ends of lines and at vertices. Each carbon atom forms 4 bonds. If fewer than 4 bonds are explicitly shown to other carbon atoms or heteroatoms, the remaining bonds are assumed to be with hydrogen atoms.
(a)
It's a 5-carbon chain with a branch on the third carbon.
1—2—3—4—5 (main chain)
|
branch
Let's write the carbons first: C—C—C—C—C
|
C
Now add hydrogens to satisfy valency (4 bonds per carbon):
C1 is at the end, bonded to C2 (1 bond shown). It needs 3 more bonds. $\rightarrow$ CH$_3$–
C2 is a vertex, bonded to C1 and C3 (2 bonds shown). It needs 2 more bonds. $\rightarrow$ –CH$_2$–
C3 is a vertex, bonded to C2, C4, and the branch carbon (3 bonds shown). It needs 1 more bond. $\rightarrow$ –CH–
C4 is a vertex, bonded to C3 and C5 (2 bonds shown). It needs 2 more bonds. $\rightarrow$ –CH$_2$–
C5 is at the end, bonded to C4 (1 bond shown). It needs 3 more bonds. $\rightarrow$ –CH$_3$
Branch carbon is at the end, bonded to C3 (1 bond shown). It needs 3 more bonds. $\rightarrow$ –CH$_3$
Putting it together: CH$_3$–CH$_2$–CH(CH$_3$)–CH$_2$–CH$_3$. This is 3-methylpentane.
Complete structural formula for (a):
H H H H H
| | | | |
H—C—C—C—C—C—H
| | | | |
H H C H H
| |
H H
|
H
(b)
It's a cyclic structure, a 5-membered ring (cyclopentane) with a branch on one carbon.
The ring is C$_5$. The branch is 2 carbons long (an ethyl group) attached to one carbon in the ring. Let's draw the 5-membered ring with explicit carbons:
C—C
/ \
C C
\ /
C
Now add the ethyl branch to one carbon (say the top one): –CH$_2$–CH$_3$.
C—C
/ \
C C
\ /
C – CH$_2$ – CH$_3$
Now add hydrogens to satisfy valency (4 bonds per carbon):
The carbon in the ring attached to the ethyl group is bonded to 3 other carbons (2 in the ring, 1 in the branch). It needs 1 hydrogen. $\rightarrow$ –CH–
The other 4 carbons in the ring are each bonded to 2 other carbons in the ring. They need 2 hydrogens each. $\rightarrow$ –CH$_2$–
The first carbon in the ethyl branch is bonded to the ring carbon and the last carbon in the branch. It needs 2 hydrogens. $\rightarrow$ –CH$_2$–
The last carbon in the ethyl branch is bonded to the previous carbon. It needs 3 hydrogens. $\rightarrow$ –CH$_3$
Putting it together: Ethylcyclopentane.
Complete structural formula for (b):
H H
| |
H—C—C—H
| |
—C—C—
/ \ / \
C C
\ /
C
Let's draw the ring atoms and hydrogens properly:
H H
| |
C – C
| |
H$_2$C CH$_2$
\ /
CH–CH$_2$–CH$_3$
|
H
Correct complete structural formula for (b):
H H
| |
C – C
| |
H$_2$C CH$_2$
\ /
C—CH$_2$—CH$_3$
| | |
H H H
|
H
(c)
It's a cyclic structure, a 4-membered ring (cyclobutane) with a chlorine atom attached to one carbon. Also shows a double bond.
Let's draw the 4-membered ring with explicit carbons:
C—C
| |
C—C
The double bond is on one side (say the top). The chlorine is on one carbon of the double bond (say the top left). Add hydrogens:
Carbon with double bond and Cl: bonded to 1 other C (in ring), 1 other C (in ring, double bond), 1 Cl. Needs 1 hydrogen. $\rightarrow$ –CH–
Carbon with double bond: bonded to 1 other C (in ring), 1 other C (in ring, double bond). Needs 2 hydrogens. $\rightarrow$ =CH$_2$ (Incorrect, double bond uses 2 bonds, needs 2 more. But it's in a ring. Let's recheck the bond-line).
Bond-line is a square with a double line on one side, and a Cl on one vertex of the double line.
Cl
|
C—C
||
C—C
Let's number the ring carbons: 1-2-3-4. Double bond is between C1 and C2. Cl is on C1.
Add hydrogens:
C1: bonded to C2 (double), C4 (single), Cl. Total bonds = 2+1+1 = 4. Needs 0 hydrogens. $\rightarrow$ C
C2: bonded to C1 (double), C3 (single). Total bonds = 2+1 = 3. Needs 1 hydrogen. $\rightarrow$ CH
C3: bonded to C2 (single), C4 (single). Total bonds = 1+1 = 2. Needs 2 hydrogens. $\rightarrow$ CH$_2$
C4: bonded to C1 (single), C3 (single). Total bonds = 1+1 = 2. Needs 2 hydrogens. $\rightarrow$ CH$_2$
So, the structure is: CCl=CH–CH$_2$–CH$_2$ (in a ring). 1-chlorocyclobutene.
Complete structural formula for (c):
Cl
|
C—CH
|| |
C—CH$_2$
| |
CH$_2$
Correct complete structural formula for (c):
Cl
|
C—CH
|| |
C—CH$_2$
| |
CH$_2$
| |
H H
This is incorrect. Hydrogens are already counted in CH/CH2/CH3 notation.
Correct complete structural formula for (c) (showing all atoms and bonds):
Cl
|
C—C
|| |
C—C—H
| |
C—C—H
| |
H H
Correct structure:
Cl
|
C—CH
|| |
C—CH$_2$
| |
CH$_2$
| |
H H
Final check: C1 (with Cl): 1(to Cl) + 2(to C2) + 1(to C4) = 4. No H. C2: 2(to C1) + 1(to C3) + 1(to H) = 4. C3: 1(to C2) + 1(to C4) + 2(to H) = 4. C4: 1(to C1) + 1(to C3) + 2(to H) = 4.
Complete formula for (c):
Cl
|
C—CH
|| |
C—CH$_2$
| |
CH$_2$
| |
H H
Wait, the bond between C1 and C4 is single. The bond between C2 and C3 is single. The bond between C3 and C4 is single. The bond between C1 and C2 is double.
Let's draw carbons and bonds first, then add hydrogens.
Cl
|
C1—C2
|| |
C4—C3—H
| |
H H
C1: bonded to C2 (double), C4 (single), Cl (single). Bonds = 2+1+1 = 4. Needs 0 H.
C2: bonded to C1 (double), C3 (single). Bonds = 2+1 = 3. Needs 1 H.
C3: bonded to C2 (single), C4 (single). Bonds = 1+1 = 2. Needs 2 H.
C4: bonded to C1 (single), C3 (single). Bonds = 1+1 = 2. Needs 2 H.
Correct complete structural formula for (c):
Cl
|
C—CH
|| |
C—CH$_2$
| |
CH$_2$
| |
H H
It is 1-chlorocyclobut-1-ene. No, the numbering should be to give lowest locants to the double bond first, then substituents. So, the double bond is between C1 and C2. Cl can be on C1 or C2. If Cl is on C1, name is 1-chlorocyclobut-1-ene. If Cl is on C2, name is 2-chlorocyclobut-1-ene. The given structure shows Cl on one end of the double bond, so it's either 1-chloro or 2-chloro. Let's assume it's 1-chlorocyclobut-1-ene.
Complete formula for (c):
Cl
|
C—CH
|| |
CH$_2$—CH$_2$ (This doesn't close the ring)
Correct structure:
Cl
|
C1—C2H
|| |
C4H$_2$—C3H$_2$
Correct complete structure for (c):
Cl H
| |
C—C
||
C—C
| |
H$_2$ H$_2$
(d)
This is a bicyclic structure with a hydroxyl group. The two rings share a carbon atom at the top vertex and a carbon atom at the bottom vertex. This is a bicyclo compound. Let's count carbons: 1 (top) + 2 (left bridge) + 1 (bottom) + 2 (right bridge) + 1 (top right branch) = 7 carbons. Total carbons = 7. Oxygen (O) with a hydrogen (H) is an alcohol group (-OH). The dot is likely the carbon where the branch starts.
Let's assume the dots are carbons. There are 7 vertices/ends representing carbons. The top vertex is a carbon, bonded to two bridge carbons and one other carbon. Let's draw it expanded without worrying about IUPAC naming:
C—C—C
| |
C—C—C
|
C—OH
Let's try counting the rings and bridgehead carbons. The structure shows a carbon at the top, bonded to two carbons on the left bridge, one carbon at the bottom, and one carbon on the right branch, and one carbon on the right bridge. This is complicated. Let's use the dot as a carbon atom.
The structure is a central dot bonded to 4 things: a bridge going up (2 carbons), a bridge going right (2 carbons), a branch going up (1 carbon and OH). This is a spiro compound or a bicyclic compound.
Given the structure, it represents a central carbon bonded to two carbons forming a ring to the left (2 carbons in bridge), two carbons forming a ring to the right (2 carbons in bridge), and a CH$_2$OH branch.
C(central) bonded to: C-C (left ring), C-C (right ring), CH$_2$-OH.
Let's try to interpret it as a bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane structure with a methyl group on the bridgehead and an alcohol group somewhere else. This is getting too complex for basic expansion.
Let's re-examine the image. It looks like a bicyclo structure. The vertices are carbons. Lines are bonds. The top vertex is a carbon. The bottom vertex is a carbon. There is a bridge between them. There are also connections forming rings. It's a bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane skeleton with a CH$_2$OH substituent.
Vertices: 1 (top), 2, 3 (left bridge), 4 (bottom), 5, 6 (right bridge), 7 (top branch point). Total 7 carbons in the bicyclo skeleton. Plus one carbon in the branch with OH.
Let's draw the skeleton carbons first:
C1
/ \
C2—C7—C6
| | |
C3—C4—C5
The bridge is C7. Let's assume C1 and C4 are bridgeheads.
C1
/ \
C2 C3
| |
C7—C4—C5
\ /
C6
This is bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane. Now add the branch CH$_2$OH. It's attached to C7 (the bridgehead). C7 is also bonded to C1, C4, C2, C5. That's 4 bonds already if C7 is bonded to C2, C3, C5, C6.
Let's assume the standard bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane numbering. Bridgeheads are 1 and 4. The bridge is carbon 7. Left bridge: 2, 3. Right bridge: 5, 6.
1
/ \
2 5
| |
3—7—6
Let's assume C7 is the carbon with the CH$_2$OH branch. C7 is also a bridgehead, bonded to 2, 3, 5, 6. That's 4 bonds. If the branch is CH$_2$OH, that makes 5 bonds to C7. This must be incorrect interpretation.
Let's assume the dot is the branch point, not a carbon. It's bonded to a CH$_2$OH group. The dot is bonded to the bicyclic skeleton. It seems bonded to the bridgehead carbon (C1 or C4 in standard numbering). Let's assume it's bonded to C1.
1
/ \
2 5 . —CH$_2$OH
| |
3—7—6
This is still confusing. Let's assume the dot is a carbon atom itself, in the skeleton. And it's bonded to CH$_2$OH.
Let's assume standard vertex = carbon rule applies everywhere.
Carbons: C1 (top), C2, C3 (left bridge), C4 (bottom), C5, C6 (right bridge), C7 (top right branch point), C8 (in branch). Total 8 carbons.
C1 bonded to C2, C6, C7.
C2 bonded to C1, C3.
C3 bonded to C2, C4.
C4 bonded to C3, C5.
C5 bonded to C4, C6.
C6 bonded to C1, C5.
C7 bonded to C1, C8.
C8 bonded to C7, O.
O bonded to C8, H.
Now add hydrogens:
C1: bonded to 3 Cs. Needs 1 H. CH
C2: bonded to 2 Cs. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C3: bonded to 2 Cs. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C4: bonded to 2 Cs. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C5: bonded to 2 Cs. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C6: bonded to 2 Cs. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C7: bonded to 2 Cs. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C8: bonded to C7, O. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
O: bonded to C8, H. Needs 0 H.
This doesn't fit the shape. The structure is likely a bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane with a methyl substituent and a hydroxymethyl substituent.
Let's assume the vertices are carbons, and lines are bonds. The top and bottom vertices are bridgeheads. There are bridges of 2 carbons on the left, 2 carbons on the right, and 1 carbon in the middle. This is a bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane skeleton.
C1
/ \
C2 C5
| |
C3—C7—C6
\ /
C4
Vertices are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Total 7 carbons in skeleton. Now add the OH branch. It originates from C7 and is CH$_2$OH. So C7 is bonded to CH$_2$-OH.
Add hydrogens to skeleton:
C1 (bridgehead): bonded to 2, 6, 7. Needs 1 H. CH
C2: bonded to 1, 3. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C3: bonded to 2, 4. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C4 (bridgehead): bonded to 3, 5, 7. Needs 1 H. CH
C5: bonded to 4, 6. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C6: bonded to 1, 5. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C7 (bridge): bonded to 1, 4. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$ (Incorrect, C7 is also where branch is attached).
Let's assume the CH$_2$OH branch is attached to C7. C7 is bonded to C1, C4, CH$_2$(branch). Bonds = 1+1+1 = 3. Needs 1 H. CH.
The carbon in the branch (bonded to C7 and OH) needs 2 H. CH$_2$. Oxygen needs 1 H. OH.
So, the structure is 7-(hydroxymethyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane.
Complete structural formula for (d):
H
|
C—CH$_2$—OH
/ \
C—C
| |
C—C
\ /
C
Let's draw it in a more expanded way.
H$_2$C—CH$_2$
/ \
H—C—CH$_2$—OH
| / |
C$_H$_2—C$_H$_2
This interpretation seems correct based on typical bond-line conventions for bicyclo compounds.
Classification Of Organic Compounds
Organic compounds are classified based on their structure:
- **Acyclic (Open chain) compounds:** Straight or branched chains of carbon atoms. Also called aliphatic compounds. Examples: Ethane, isobutane, acetaldehyde, acetic acid.
- **Cyclic (Closed chain or Ring) compounds:** Carbon atoms form rings. * **Alicyclic compounds:** Cyclic compounds resembling aliphatic compounds. Rings contain only carbon atoms (homocyclic) or heteroatoms (heterocyclic). Examples: Cyclopropane, cyclohexane, tetrahydrofuran. * **Aromatic compounds:** Special cyclic compounds with conjugated $\pi$ systems, exhibiting aromaticity (benzene and related compounds - benzenoid; or rings with heteroatoms - heterocyclic aromatic). Examples: Benzene, aniline, furan, pyridine. Some non-benzenoid aromatic compounds exist like tropone.
Organic compounds are also classified by functional groups into **homologous series**.
Functional Group
A **functional group** is an atom or group of atoms within a molecule that is primarily responsible for its characteristic chemical properties (e.g., -OH, -CHO, -COOH).
Homologous Series
A **homologous series** is a family of organic compounds with the same functional group and similar chemical properties. Successive members (homologues) in a series differ by a -CH$_2$ unit. Examples: Alkanes (CH$_4$, C$_2$H$_6$, C$_3$H$_8$, etc.), alkenes, alkanols, alkanoic acids.
Compounds can have multiple identical or different functional groups (polyfunctional compounds).
Nomenclature Of Organic Compounds
With millions of organic compounds, a systematic naming system is essential for clear communication. The **IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) system of nomenclature** provides rules for naming organic compounds based on their structure.
Before IUPAC, compounds were named based on origin or properties (trivial/common names). While many common names are still used (e.g., formic acid, toluene), systematic IUPAC names are preferred.
Compound | Structure | Common name |
Methyl alcohol | CH$_3$OH | wood alcohol |
Ethyl alcohol | CH$_3$CH$_2$OH | grain alcohol |
CH$_3$COCH$_3$ | acetone | |
CH$_3$COOH | acetic acid | |
HCOOH | formic acid |
The Iupac System Of Nomenclature
An IUPAC name consists of a **root name** (based on the parent hydrocarbon chain or ring), **suffix(es)** (indicating functional group(s)), and **prefix(es)** (indicating substituents other than those given by the suffix). Numbers (locants) are used to indicate the positions of functional groups and substituents.
Iupac Nomenclature Of Alkanes
- **Straight chain alkanes:** Named using a prefix indicating the number of carbons (meth-, eth-, prop-, but-, pent-, hex-, etc.) followed by the suffix '-ane'. Examples: Methane (CH$_4$), Ethane (C$_2$H$_6$), Propane (C$_3$H$_8$), Butane (C$_4$H$_{10}$), Pentane (C$_5$H$_{12}$), Hexane (C$_6$H$_{14}$).
- **Branched chain alkanes:** Named by identifying the longest continuous carbon chain as the parent alkane. Branches are alkyl groups (alkane minus one H, e.g., methyl -CH$_3$, ethyl -CH$_2$CH$_3$). Alkyl groups are named by replacing '-ane' with '-yl'. Positions of branches are indicated by numbering the parent chain such that the branches get the lowest possible numbers. Multiple identical branches use prefixes (di-, tri-). Different branches are listed alphabetically.
- **Cyclic Alkanes:** Named by prefixing 'cyclo' to the name of the corresponding straight-chain alkane. Substituent naming follows similar rules as branched alkanes, with numbering starting to give the lowest locants to substituents (alphabetical order for ties).
Name | Molecular formula | Structure |
Methane | CH$_4$ | CH$_4$ |
Ethane | C$_2$H$_6$ | CH$_3$CH$_3$ |
Propane | C$_3$H$_8$ | CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_3$ |
Butane | C$_4$H$_{10}$ | CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_3$ |
Pentane | C$_5$H$_{12}$ | CH$_3$(CH$_2$)$_3$CH$_3$ |
Hexane | C$_6$H$_{14}$ | CH$_3$(CH$_2$)$_4$CH$_3$ |
Heptane | C$_7$H$_{16}$ | CH$_3$(CH$_2$)$_5$CH$_3$ |
Octane | C$_8$H$_{18}$ | CH$_3$(CH$_2$)$_6$CH$_3$ |
Nonane | C$_9$H$_{20}$ | CH$_3$(CH$_2$)$_7$CH$_3$ |
Decane | C$_{10}$H$_{22}$ | CH$_3$(CH$_2$)$_8$CH$_3$ |
Alkane | Molecular formula | Alkyl group | Formula |
Methane | CH$_4$ | Methyl | -CH$_3$ |
Ethane | C$_2$H$_6$ | Ethyl | -CH$_2$CH$_3$ |
Propane | C$_3$H$_8$ | Propyl | -CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_3$ |
Butane | C$_4$H$_{10}$ | Butyl | -CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_3$ |
Common branched alkyl groups (isopropyl, sec-butyl, isobutyl, tert-butyl, neopentyl) are also used (Table 12.3). The carbon atom attaching to the main chain in a branched alkyl group is numbered 1 within that group.
Problem 12.7. Structures and IUPAC names of some hydrocarbons are given below. Explain why the names given in the parentheses are incorrect. (a) (2,5,6-Trimethyloctane) (3,4,7-Trimethyloctane) (b) (3-Ethyl-5-methylheptane) (5-Ethyl-3-methylheptane) (c) (3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane) (1-Ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane)
Answer:
(a)
Structure: A chain of 8 carbons (octane) with three methyl branches.
H$_3$C—CH—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH—CH—CH$_2$—CH$_3$
|
CH$_3$
|
CH$_3$ CH$_3$
Correct parent chain is 8 carbons (octane).
If numbering from left to right: Branches are on carbons 2, 5, 6. Name: 2,5,6-Trimethyloctane.
If numbering from right to left: Branches are on carbons 3, 4, 7. Name: 3,4,7-Trimethyloctane.
Rule: Numbering should give the lowest possible set of locants (numbers) to the substituents. Compare the sets of locants: (2, 5, 6) vs (3, 4, 7). Since 2 < 3, the set (2, 5, 6) is the lowest set.
The name given in parenthesis (3,4,7-Trimethyloctane) is incorrect because the numbering results in a higher set of locants (3,4,7) compared to the correct numbering from the left (2,5,6).
(b)
Structure: A chain of 7 carbons (heptane) with an ethyl branch and a methyl branch.
H$_3$C—CH$_2$—CH—CH$_2$—CH—CH$_2$—CH$_3$
| |
CH$_2$CH$_3$ CH$_3$
Correct parent chain is 7 carbons (heptane).
If numbering from left to right: Ethyl on C3, Methyl on C5. Name: 3-Ethyl-5-methylheptane.
If numbering from right to left: Methyl on C3, Ethyl on C5. Name: 5-Ethyl-3-methylheptane.
Rule: If the two substituents are found in equivalent positions when numbering from either end (sum of locants is the same, or the first points of difference are the same when comparing sets), the lower number is given to the substituent that comes first in the alphabetical listing. In this case, Ethyl (E) comes before Methyl (M) alphabetically. The set of locants is (3, 5) in both numbering directions. So, alphabetical order decides which group gets the lower number. Numbering from left to right gives Ethyl (on C3) a lower number than Methyl (on C5). Numbering from right to left gives Methyl (on C3) a lower number than Ethyl (on C5).
Since Ethyl (E) comes before Methyl (M) alphabetically, the numbering should be from left to right so that Ethyl gets the lower number (3). The correct name is 3-Ethyl-5-methylheptane.
The name given in parenthesis (5-Ethyl-3-methylheptane) is incorrect because the numbering is done from the right, giving a lower number to the methyl group (3) which comes later in alphabetical order than the ethyl group (on C5).
(c)
Structure: A 6-membered ring (cyclohexane) with a methyl group and a chlorine atom attached.
This is a cyclic compound with two different substituents. The parent name is cyclohexane. The substituents are Methyl (-CH$_3$) and Chloro (-Cl). The rule is to number the ring carbons to give the lowest possible locants to the substituents. If there are different substituents, numbering starts at the substituent that comes first in alphabetical order (unless a specific functional group is present). Chloro (C) comes before Methyl (M) alphabetically.
Let's look at the names given:
3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane (incorrect parenthesis name: 1-ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane). Let's analyse the given name: 3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane. Parent is cyclohexane. Substituents are one ethyl and two methyls. Locants are 1, 1, 3. The correct name is 1,1-Dimethyl-3-ethylcyclohexane (alphabetical order). So the name given is correct, but the parenthesised one is incorrect.
Let's analyse the parenthesised name: 1-ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane. Parent is cyclohexane. Substituents are one ethyl and two methyls. Locants are 1, 3, 3. Comparing the set of locants (1, 1, 3) vs (1, 3, 3). The first set is lower. So 1,1-dimethyl-3-ethylcyclohexane is the correct name.
However, the original structure shown in the text for (c) is methylchlorocyclohexane, not dimethyl ethylcyclohexane. The text seems to have used the example names incorrectly for the problem. Let's assume the structure shown for (c) (a cyclohexane ring with a Cl and a CH$_3$) corresponds to the names 3-chloro-1-methylcyclohexane or similar.
Let's assume the intended structure for (c) is 1-chloro-3-methylcyclohexane. Parent is cyclohexane. Substituents are Chloro (-Cl) and Methyl (-CH$_3$). Chloro comes before Methyl alphabetically. So, numbering should start at the carbon with Cl and proceed to give the lowest number to the next substituent (Methyl). If Cl is on C1, Methyl is on C3 (1,3). If Methyl is on C1, Cl is on C3 (1,3). Locant set is (1, 3) in both cases. Alphabetical order (Chloro before Methyl) dictates that Cl gets the lower number (1). The correct name is 1-chloro-3-methylcyclohexane.
Let's assume the names given in (c) (3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane) refer to the structure of a cyclohexane ring with two methyl groups on one carbon and one ethyl group on another carbon.
CH$_3$
|
C—CH$_3$
|
Ring—C
|
CH$_2$CH$_3$
Correct numbering: Ring carbons get lowest locants. Alphabetical order of substituents (Ethyl before Methyl). The two methyls are on the same carbon. Let's say Ethyl is on C1. Then Methyls are on C3. Name: 1-ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane. Locants (1, 3, 3). What if Methyls are on C1? Then Ethyl is on C3. Name: 1,1-dimethyl-3-ethylcyclohexane. Locants (1, 1, 3). This set is lower. So 1,1-dimethyl-3-ethylcyclohexane is the correct parent name structure.
Given name: 3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane. This means Ethyl is on C3 and two Methyls are on C1. Name: 1,1-dimethyl-3-ethylcyclohexane. Locants (1,1,3). The given name uses 3-Ethyl and 1,1-dimethyl. This indicates a disconnect. Let's assume the numbers refer to positions relative to some starting point, and the alphabetical order is applied to the full name. If we number such that the dimethyl group is on C1, the ethyl group is on C3. The name is 1,1-dimethyl-3-ethylcyclohexane. Alphabetical order is ethyl before dimethyl. So ethyl should get the lower number if there's a choice. Let's assume the given names in (c) are meant to show the application of the alphabetical rule when locants are equally low. If the substituents are on carbons 1 and 3 (which is the lowest possible combination for two distinct monosubstituted carbons), then alphabetical order determines which gets number 1. Chloro before Methyl. But here it is dimethyl and ethyl.
Let's focus on the rule explanation provided by the text in point 5: "If the two substituents are found in equivalent positions, the lower number is given to the one coming first in the alphabetical listing. Thus, the following compound is 3-ethyl-6-methyloctane and not 6-ethyl-3-methyloctane." This example confirms that if the set of locants is the same from either direction (3,6 vs 3,6 in the example), then alphabetical order determines priority for the lower locant. Ethyl (E) before Methyl (M), so Ethyl gets the lower locant (3). My earlier analysis of 3-ethyl-5-methylheptane vs 5-ethyl-3-methylheptane was correct based on this rule.
Let's revisit (a) and (b) in Problem 12.7 in the context of the explanation provided.
(a) 2,5,6-Trimethyloctane (correct) vs 3,4,7-Trimethyloctane (incorrect). The set of locants (2,5,6) is lower than (3,4,7). This follows rule 2/3. Not rule 5.
(b) 3-Ethyl-5-methylheptane (correct) vs 5-Ethyl-3-methylheptane (incorrect). Parent chain 7 carbons. Substituents at 3 and 5. Locants (3,5) in both directions. Ethyl at 3, Methyl at 5 (from left). Methyl at 3, Ethyl at 5 (from right). Alphabetical order: Ethyl before Methyl. Ethyl gets the lower number (3). Name 3-ethyl-5-methylheptane is correct. 5-ethyl-3-methylheptane is incorrect because Methyl (on C3) comes later in alphabetical order than Ethyl (on C5). This illustrates rule 5.
(c) 3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane (incorrect parenthesis name: 1-ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane). Let's analyse the given names assuming they refer to the structure with one ethyl and two methyl groups on a cyclohexane ring. Name: 3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane. Parent is cyclohexane. Substituents: Ethyl and two Methyls. Locants: 1,1,3. Alphabetical order: Ethyl (E) before Dimethyl (M). Let's try numbering: If the carbons with substituents are 1 and 3. If Ethyl is on C1 and two Methyls on C3, name is 1-ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane. Locants (1, 3, 3). If two Methyls are on C1 and Ethyl is on C3, name is 1,1-dimethyl-3-ethylcyclohexane. Locants (1, 1, 3). The set (1, 1, 3) is lower than (1, 3, 3). So the correct numbering starts at the carbon with the two methyls. The name is 1,1-dimethyl-3-ethylcyclohexane.
The given name is 3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane. It seems the text is trying to show that alphabetical order is used *after* the lowest locant set is determined. The lowest locant set is (1, 1, 3). The substituents are on positions 1 (two methyls) and 3 (one ethyl). The name is constructed as [locant]-[substituent name]... Parent. Substituents are listed alphabetically: Ethyl, Dimethyl. So Ethyl comes first. The correct name should be 3-ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane.
Wait, the text marks the name (3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane) as correct, and (1-ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane) as incorrect. This is opposite to the rules established! Let's reread Rule 5 and apply it rigorously to the original example in the text: "3-ethyl-6-methyloctane and not 6-ethyl-3-methyloctane". Octane, substituents at 3 and 6. Set (3,6). From left: Ethyl at 3, Methyl at 6. From right: Methyl at 3, Ethyl at 6. Alphabetical: Ethyl (E) before Methyl (M). So Ethyl gets the lower locant if there's a tie like (3,6) vs (3,6) if counted from opposite ends. This rule seems to be about choosing between numbering directions when the locant *sets* are identical. Here the set is (3,6) from both directions. So, the one that comes first alphabetically (Ethyl) gets the lower number (3). So 3-ethyl-6-methyloctane is correct. My previous analysis was correct. Rule 5 applies when the set of locants is the same regardless of numbering direction (e.g., 3,6 vs 3,6). The alphabet rule applies to which group gets the lower number in that set.
Let's re-examine the case in (c): 1,1-dimethyl-3-ethylcyclohexane vs 1-ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane. The set of locants from the first name is (1, 1, 3). The set of locants from the second name is (1, 3, 3). The set (1, 1, 3) is the lower set of locants. So the numbering starts at the carbon with the two methyl groups, and the ethyl group is on carbon 3. The correct name must use the lowest locant set (1,1,3). Within this set, the substituents are two methyls at 1 and one ethyl at 3. The name construction is [locant]-[substituent name]... followed by the parent. Substituents are listed alphabetically. Ethyl (E) comes before Dimethyl (M). So the name is 3-ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane.
The text marks (3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane) as the correct name and (1-ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane) as incorrect. My derivation based on lowest locant set followed by alphabetical ordering matches this. The confusion was in applying rule 5 to this case, which is not about equivalent positions, but about which set of locants is lower.
Final analysis of Problem 12.7:
(a) 2,5,6-Trimethyloctane (correct) vs 3,4,7-Trimethyloctane (incorrect): Incorrect because (3,4,7) is not the lowest set of locants; (2,5,6) is lower.
(b) 3-Ethyl-5-methylheptane (correct) vs 5-Ethyl-3-methylheptane (incorrect): The set of locants is (3,5) from either direction. Alphabetical order (Ethyl before Methyl) determines that Ethyl gets the lower locant (3).
(c) 3-Ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane (correct) vs 1-ethyl-3,3-dimethylcyclohexane (incorrect): The lowest set of locants for the substituents is (1,1,3), achieved by numbering the carbon with the two methyls as C1. The substituents are two methyls at C1 and one ethyl at C3. Substituents are named alphabetically: Ethyl before Dimethyl. The name is 3-ethyl-1,1-dimethylcyclohexane. The parenthesised name uses the higher locant set (1,3,3) by starting numbering at the carbon with the ethyl group and proceeding to the carbon with the two methyls. This is incorrect.
So the explanations provided in the text for why the parenthesised names are incorrect are based on applying the IUPAC rules correctly (lowest locants first, then alphabetical order for ties in locants). My initial detailed analysis aligns with this. The confusion was in the interpretation of Rule 5 and applying it to cases it didn't directly apply to, and a potential misunderstanding of the example structures in the problem statement versus the names provided.
Final answer explanation for Problem 12.7 will state why the parenthesised name violates the specific IUPAC rule.
Nomenclature Of Organic Compounds Having Functional Group(s)
Functional groups determine the chemical properties of organic compounds. The IUPAC name of a compound with a functional group is derived from the parent hydrocarbon, with the functional group indicated by a suffix or prefix (Table 12.4).
Class of compounds | Functional group | Prefix | Suffix |
Acids | -COOH | carboxy | -oic acid |
Sulfonic acids | -SO$_3$H | sulfo | sulfonic acid |
Anhydrides | -CO O CO- | alkanoyloxycarbonyl | -oic anhydride |
Esters | -COOR | alkoxycarbonyl | -oate |
Acid halides | -COCl | haloformyl | -oyl halide |
Amides | -CONH$_2$ | carbamoyl | -amide |
Nitriles | -CN | cyano | -nitrile |
Aldehydes | -CHO | formyl or oxo | -al |
Ketones | >C=O | oxo | -one |
Alcohols | -OH | hydroxy | -ol |
Phenols | -OH (on benzene ring) | hydroxy | -ol |
Amines | -NH$_2$ | amino | -amine |
Ethers | -OR | alkoxy | - |
Alkenes | >C=C< | alkenyl | -ene |
Alkynes | -C$\equiv$C- | alkynyl | -yne |
Nitro compounds | -NO$_2$ | nitro | - |
Halogen compounds | -X (X=F, Cl, Br, I) | halo | - |
Steps for naming compounds with functional groups:
- Identify the principal functional group (highest priority).
- Identify the longest carbon chain containing the principal functional group; this is the parent chain.
- Number the parent chain to give the principal functional group the lowest possible locant.
- Other functional groups (subordinate) and substituents are named as prefixes.
- Name the compound using prefixes, locants, parent chain name, and suffix(es) for the functional group(s).
Order of priority for common functional groups (decreasing): -COOH > -SO$_3$H > -COOR > -COCl > -CONH$_2$ > -CN > -CHO > >C=O > -OH > -NH$_2$ > >C=C< > -C$\equiv$C-.
Substituents like alkyl groups, halogens, -NO$_2$, -OR are always named as prefixes.
Problem 12.8. Write the IUPAC names of the compounds i-iv from their given structures. i) ii) iii) iv)
Answer:
i)
Structure:
CH$_3$
|
CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH(CH$_3$)CH$_2$CH$_2$OH
Identify the principal functional group: -OH (Alcohol). Suffix is -ol.
Identify the longest carbon chain containing the -OH group. Number the chain to give -OH the lowest locant.
Chain starts from the end closer to OH:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH(CH$_3$)CH$_2$CH$_2$OH
|
CH$_3$
Oops, numbering should start from the end with OH.
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH(CH$_3$)CH$_2$CH$_2$OH
|
CH$_3$ (Methyl branch on C2)
The longest chain containing -OH is 8 carbons (octane). OH is on C1. Methyl is on C2.
Parent name: Octan-1-ol. Substituent: Methyl on C2.
Systematic name: 2-Methyloctan-1-ol.
Wait, the provided solution is 6-Methyloctan-3-ol. Let's re-examine the initial structure provided in the problem, represented by bond-line in the solution. It has an 8-carbon chain with an OH group and a methyl group.
Bond-line in solution (i):
OH
|
/\/\/\
|
\/
This is an 8-carbon chain with an OH group and a methyl branch. Numbering starts to give the OH the lowest number.
OH on C1: OH—/\/\/\
|
\/
Longest chain is 8 carbons. OH is on C1. Methyl is on C2.
Name: 2-Methyloctan-1-ol.
Let's assume the bond-line in the provided solution is correct and derive the name from it. It's an 8-carbon chain with OH and Methyl. Number the chain from the end giving OH the lowest number.
OH on C3: HO—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH(OH)—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_3$ ? No, the zig-zag is an 8-carbon chain.
Let's draw an 8-carbon zig-zag: /\/\/\/\
Add OH to C3: /\/\/\/\
|
OH
Add methyl to C6: /\/\/\/\
| |
OH \/
Name from this structure: 6-Methyloctan-3-ol.
So the initial structure in the problem seems different from the bond-line in the solution. Let's assume the bond-line in the solution is correct and derive the name, as the solution provides the name based on that bond-line. The solution states the IUPAC name is 6-Methyloctan-3-ol. Let's draw this and verify the bond-line.
Octan-3-ol: 8 carbon chain, OH on C3. CH$_3$CH$_2$CH(OH)CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_3$.
6-Methyl: Methyl branch on C6. CH$_3$CH$_2$CH(OH)CH$_2$CH$_2$CH(CH$_3$)CH$_2$CH$_3$.
Let's draw the bond-line for this:
OH
|
/\/\/\/\
|
\/
This bond-line matches the one in the solution's first part (i). So the initial question's structure text seems wrong. Let's use the bond-line structure and the provided name in the solution as the basis for explanation.
i) Bond-line structure:
OH
|
/\/\/\/\
|
\/
Principal functional group is -OH (alcohol), suffix -ol. Longest carbon chain containing -OH is 8 carbons (octane). Numbering starts from the end closer to -OH. From left, OH is on C3. From right, OH is on C6. 3 is lower than 6, so number from left.
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8
/\/\/\/\
|
OH
Methyl branch is on C6 (from the left numbering). Name: 6-Methyloctan-3-ol.
ii) Structure:
O O
// //
CH$_3$—C—CH$_2$—C—CH$_3$
Principal functional group is ketone (>C=O), suffix -one. Two ketone groups, so suffix -dione. Number the chain to give the ketone carbons lowest locants.
1 2 3 4 5
CH$_3$—C—CH$_2$—C—CH$_3$
// //
O O
Ketones are on C2 and C4. Longest chain is 5 carbons (pentane). Parent hydrocarbon pentane.
Systematic name: Pentane-2,4-dione. (The provided solution says Hexane-2,4-dione. This implies the initial structure in the problem was different, with 6 carbons. Let's assume the initial structure text was CH$_3$CO CH$_2$ CO CH$_2$ CH$_3$. This has 6 carbons. Then numbering gives ketones on C2 and C4 from left or C3 and C5 from right. Set (2,4) is lower than (3,5). So numbering from left. Longest chain 6 carbons. Hexane-2,4-dione. Okay, let's use the solution's name and assume that was the structure.)
Assuming the structure text was CH$_3$CO CH$_2$ CO CH$_2$ CH$_3$:
O O
// //
CH$_3$—C—CH$_2$—C—CH$_2$—CH$_3$
1 2 3 4 5 6
Ketones on C2 and C4. Longest chain 6 carbons (hexane). Name: Hexane-2,4-dione.
iii) Structure:
O
//
HO—C—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—C—CH$_3$
Principal functional group is carboxylic acid (-COOH), suffix -oic acid. It's on C1. Ketone (>C=O) is on C6. Ketone is a subordinate functional group, prefix 'oxo'. Longest chain containing -COOH is 6 carbons (hexane). Parent hydrocarbon hexane.
Systematic name: 6-Oxohexanoic acid. (The provided solution says 5-Oxohexanoic acid. This implies the ketone was on C5 relative to the acid. Let's assume the structure text was HOOC–CH$_2$–CH$_2$–CH$_2$–CH$_2$–CO–CH$_3$. Let's count carbons from COOH: 1-2-3-4-5-6-7. Longest chain with COOH is 7 carbons. Ketone is on C6. Name: 6-Oxoheptanoic acid. Again, inconsistency. Let's assume the provided solution's name is correct and derive the structure, although the provided structure text seems wrong. 5-Oxohexanoic acid. Hexanoic acid has 6 carbons, COOH on C1. Ketone on C5. CH$_3$—CO—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—COOH.)
Let's assume the provided solution's name 5-Oxohexanoic acid corresponds to the structure: CH$_3$—CO—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—COOH
1 2 3 4 5 6
Ketone on C2, Acid on C6. Longest chain with acid is 6 carbons. Name: 2-Oxohexanoic acid. Still doesn't match. There is a lot of inconsistency between problem structures, provided solution bond-lines, and provided solution names in this problem.
Let's assume the structure text in the problem statement is correct for (iii): HO—C—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—C—CH$_3$. It has 1+5+1+1 = 8 carbons. Functional groups are acid (-COOH) on one end and ketone (>C=O) on the other end. Numbering starts from the acid end (higher priority).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
HO—C—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—C—CH$_3$
|| ||
O O
Principal group: Carboxylic acid (-COOH). Parent chain: 8 carbons (octane). Suffix: -oic acid. Oxo group on C7. Name: 7-Oxooctanoic acid.
Let's assume the solution's name (5-Oxohexanoic acid) is the target and draw its structure: CH$_3$COCH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$COOH.
iv) Structure:
CH$_2$=CH—CH=CH—C$\equiv$CH
This contains two double bonds and one triple bond. Longest chain is 6 carbons. Double bonds on C1 and C3. Triple bond on C5. Numbering from the end giving multiple bonds lowest locants. If numbered from left, double bonds are at 1,3 and triple bond at 5. If from right, triple bond is at 1, double bonds at 3,5. Locants from left: 1,3,5. Locants from right: 1,3,5. Same set. Rule for tie: Give double bonds preference for lower locants over triple bonds if the set of locants is the same. Double bond starts at C1, triple bond starts at C5. Double bond gets lower preference. Name: Hexa-1,3-dien-5-yne.
Let's check the provided solution's bond-line (iv):
/\ /—
Numbering from left: double bond at 1,3. Triple bond at 5. 6 carbons. Name: Hexa-1,3-dien-5-yne.
Numbering from right: Triple bond at 1 (end), double bond at 3,5. Locants from right: 1,3,5. Same set. Double bond starts at 1 from left end (C1=C2). Triple bond starts at 1 from right end (C5$\equiv$C6). Double bond gets priority for lowest locant. So numbering is from left.
1 2 3 4 5 6
/\ /—
Double bonds are on C1 and C3. Triple bond is on C5.
Name: Hexa-1,3-dien-5-yne.
All parts of Problem 12.8 have significant inconsistencies between the stated problem structures, solution bond-lines, and solution names. I will assume the provided solution *names* are the target and briefly explain the structures corresponding to those names.
i) 6-Methyloctan-3-ol: Octane (8C), OH on C3, Methyl on C6. CH$_3$CH$_2$CH(OH)CH$_2$CH$_2$CH(CH$_3$)CH$_2$CH$_3$.
ii) Hexane-2,4-dione: Hexane (6C), ketones on C2 and C4. CH$_3$COCH$_2$COCH$_2$CH$_3$.
iii) 5-Oxohexanoic acid: Hexanoic acid (6C, COOH on C1), oxo (ketone) on C5. CH$_3$COCH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$COOH.
iv) Hexa-1,3-dien-5-yne: Hexa (6C), diene (two double bonds) on C1,3, yne (triple bond) on C5. CH$_2$=CH-CH=CH-C$\equiv$CH.
Problem 12.9. Derive the structure of (i) 2-Chlorohexane, (ii) Pent-4-en-2-ol, (iii) 3- Nitrocyclohexene, (iv) Cyclohex-2-en-1-ol, (v) 6-Hydroxyheptanal.
Answer:
To derive the structure from the IUPAC name, break down the name into its parts: prefix(es), locant(s), parent name, and suffix(es). Build the parent structure, add the functional group(s) at the indicated locant(s), add the substituents at the indicated locant(s), and finally add hydrogen atoms to satisfy carbon valency (4).
(i) 2-Chlorohexane:
- Parent name: hexane $\implies$ 6 carbon chain.
- Suffix: -ane $\implies$ saturated hydrocarbon.
- Prefix: 2-chloro $\implies$ Chlorine atom attached to carbon number 2.
Draw a 6-carbon chain: C—C—C—C—C—C.
Number the chain (arbitrarily from left): 1-2-3-4-5-6.
Attach Cl to C2: C—C(Cl)—C—C—C—C.
Add hydrogens to satisfy valency:
CH$_3$—CH(Cl)—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_3$.
Structure: CH$_3$CH(Cl)CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_3$
(ii) Pent-4-en-2-ol:
- Parent name: pent $\implies$ 5 carbon chain.
- Suffixes: -en (alkene, double bond), -ol (alcohol, -OH group). -ol is the principal functional group (higher priority).
- Locants: 4-en $\implies$ double bond starts at carbon 4. 2-ol $\implies$ -OH group on carbon 2.
Draw a 5-carbon chain: C—C—C—C—C.
Number the chain to give the principal functional group (-OH) the lowest locant: Numbering starts from the end closer to -OH. OH on C2. Double bond starts at C4. So, numbering from right to left.
5 4 3 2 1
C—C=C—C—C(OH).
Double bond starts at C4 (from the right end): C—C=C—C—C(OH).
Add hydrogens:
CH$_3$—CH=CH—CH(OH)—CH$_3$. Let's check numbering and locants based on principal group OH (on C2 from right). Double bond is between C4 and C5 (from right). So 4-en from the right numbering. Let's use left-to-right numbering to verify.
1 2 3 4 5
CH$_3$—CH=CH—CH(OH)—CH$_3$. OH is on C4, double bond between C1 and C2. Name: Pent-1-en-4-ol.
The name Pent-4-en-2-ol implies OH on C2 and double bond starting at C4. Numbering must give the principal group (-OH) the lowest locant. So numbering starts from the end closest to OH. Let's say OH is on C2 from left. Then double bond is between C4 and C5.
1 2 3 4 5
C—C(OH)—C—C=C.
Add hydrogens:
CH$_3$—CH(OH)—CH$_2$—CH=CH$_2$. OH is on C2, double bond between C4 and C5 (locant 4). Name: Pent-4-en-2-ol. This matches the name.
Structure: CH$_3$CH(OH)CH$_2$CH=CH$_2$
(iii) 3- Nitrocyclohexene:
- Parent name: cyclohexene $\implies$ 6-membered ring with one double bond.
- Suffix: -ene $\implies$ double bond.
- Prefix: 3-nitro $\implies$ nitro group (-NO$_2$) on carbon 3.
Draw a 6-membered ring with a double bond. Number the carbons in the ring starting from one carbon of the double bond, to give the double bond the lowest locant (1-ene or just -ene if locant 1). The other carbon of the double bond gets number 2. The double bond gets locant 1 unless specified otherwise. So double bond is between C1 and C2. Nitro group on C3.
Draw cyclohexane ring with double bond (C1=C2). Add NO$_2$ on C3.
NO$_2$
|
C—C
| ||
C C
\ /
C—C
Numbering: C1=C2. Let C1 be the carbon next to C3. So C1-C2 is the double bond. C3 has NO2. Ring: C1—C2=C3—C4—C5—C6—C1. Double bond between C1 and C2 (locant 1). Nitro on C3.
NO$_2$
|
C3—C2
| ||
C4 C1
\ /
C5—C6
Add hydrogens:
C1: bonded to C2 (double), C6 (single). Needs 1 H. CH
C2: bonded to C1 (double), C3 (single). Needs 1 H. CH
C3: bonded to C2 (single), C4 (single), NO$_2$ (single). Needs 1 H. CH
C4: bonded to C3 (single), C5 (single). Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C5: bonded to C4 (single), C6 (single). Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C6: bonded to C5 (single), C1 (single). Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
Structure: A cyclohexane ring with a double bond and an NO$_2$ group on C3 relative to the double bond (assuming double bond is at 1).
Structure: A cyclohexane ring with a double bond between two carbons, and an NO$_2$ group attached to the carbon adjacent to the double bond. Numbering starts at the double bond.
Let's draw the skeletal ring with double bond and NO$_2$ branch:
NO$_2$
|
\ /
C—C
|| |
C C
\ /
C—C
(iv) Cyclohex-2-en-1-ol:
- Parent name: cyclohex $\implies$ 6-membered ring.
- Suffixes: -en (double bond), -ol (alcohol, -OH). -ol is principal group.
- Locants: 2-en $\implies$ double bond starts at carbon 2. 1-ol $\implies$ -OH group on carbon 1.
Draw 6-membered ring. Number the carbon with -OH as C1. Double bond starts at C2 (so between C2 and C3). Add hydrogens.
OH
|
C1—C2
| ||
C6 C3
\ /
C5—C4
Add hydrogens:
C1: bonded to C2, C6, OH. Bonds = 1+1+1=3. Needs 1 H. CH
C2: bonded to C1, C3 (double). Bonds = 1+2=3. Needs 1 H. CH
C3: bonded to C2 (double), C4 (single). Bonds = 2+1=3. Needs 1 H. CH
C4: bonded to C3, C5. Bonds = 1+1=2. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C5: bonded to C4, C6. Bonds = 1+1=2. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
C6: bonded to C1, C5. Bonds = 1+1=2. Needs 2 H. CH$_2$
Structure: A cyclohexane ring with an -OH group on one carbon and a double bond between the carbon adjacent to the -OH carbon (C2) and the next carbon (C3).
Skeletal structure:
OH
|
/\/
||
\
\/
(v) 6-Hydroxyheptanal:
- Parent name: heptanal $\implies$ 7 carbon chain with an aldehyde functional group (-CHO). The aldehyde carbon is C1.
- Prefix: 6-hydroxy $\implies$ -OH group on carbon 6.
Draw a 7-carbon chain: C—C—C—C—C—C—C.
Aldehyde group is at one end (C1). Let the CHO group be at the right end. CH$_3$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—CHO.
Number from the aldehyde carbon: 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CHO
-OH group on C6 (from the CHO end):
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
CH$_3$CH(OH)CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CHO.
Add hydrogens to satisfy valency (already done in the line above, just need to write out fully or check).
Structure: CH$_3$CH(OH)CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CH$_2$CHO
Nomenclature Of Substituted Benzene Compounds
Substituted benzene compounds are named by placing the substituent as a prefix to 'benzene'. Common names for some substituted benzenes are widely used (e.g., Toluene for methylbenzene, Aniline for aminobenzene, Anisole for methoxybenzene).
For disubstituted benzene, positions are indicated by numbering the ring carbons to give the lowest possible locants (e.g., 1,2-, 1,3-, 1,4-). Trivial prefixes ortho (o-) for 1,2-, meta (m-) for 1,3-, and para (p-) for 1,4- are also used.
For tri- or higher substituted benzenes, lowest locant rule applies, and substituents are named alphabetically. If a common name derivative is used as the base, its principal functional group carbon is C1, and numbering follows to give the next substituent lowest locant.
When the benzene ring acts as a substituent on an alkane chain containing a functional group, the benzene ring is named as a phenyl group (C$_6$H$_5$-, abbreviated Ph).
Problem 12.10. Write the structural formula of: (a) o-Ethylanisole, (b) p-Nitroaniline, (c) 2,3 - Dibromo -1 - phenylpentane, (d) 4-Ethyl-1-fluoro-2-nitrobenzene.
Answer:
To write the structural formula from the name, identify the parent structure and the substituents with their positions.
(a) o-Ethylanisole:
- Parent: Anisole. Anisole is methoxybenzene (benzene ring with a -OCH$_3$ group). The carbon with -OCH$_3$ is C1.
- Prefix: o-Ethyl $\implies$ Ethyl group (-CH$_2$CH$_3$) is in the ortho position (1,2-) relative to the -OCH$_3$ group. Ortho position relative to C1 is C2 or C6. Let's place it at C2.
Draw benzene ring. Attach -OCH$_3$ to one carbon (C1). Attach -CH$_2$CH$_3$ to the adjacent carbon (C2).
Structure: A benzene ring with an -OCH$_3$ group and a -CH$_2$CH$_3$ group on adjacent carbons.
OCH$_3$
|
C—C—CH$_2$CH$_3$
| |
ring
(b) p-Nitroaniline:
- Parent: Aniline. Aniline is aminobenzene (benzene ring with a -NH$_2$ group). The carbon with -NH$_2$ is C1.
- Prefix: p-Nitro $\implies$ Nitro group (-NO$_2$) is in the para position (1,4-) relative to the -NH$_2$ group. Para position relative to C1 is C4.
Draw benzene ring. Attach -NH$_2$ to C1. Attach -NO$_2$ to C4.
Structure: A benzene ring with an -NH$_2$ group and an -NO$_2$ group on opposite carbons (1,4 positions).
NH$_2$
|
C—C—C—C—NO$_2$
| | | |
ring
(c) 2,3 - Dibromo -1 - phenylpentane:
- Parent name: pentane $\implies$ 5 carbon chain.
- Suffix: -ane $\implies$ saturated hydrocarbon.
- Prefixes: 2,3-dibromo $\implies$ Bromine atoms on carbon 2 and 3. 1-phenyl $\implies$ Phenyl group (benzene ring substituent) on carbon 1.
Draw a 5-carbon chain: C—C—C—C—C.
Number the chain: 1-2-3-4-5.
Attach phenyl to C1: C(phenyl)—C—C—C—C.
Attach Bromine to C2: C(phenyl)—C(Br)—C—C—C.
Attach Bromine to C3: C(phenyl)—C(Br)—C(Br)—C—C.
Add hydrogens to satisfy valency:
C$_6$H$_5$—CH$_2$—CH(Br)—CH(Br)—CH$_2$—CH$_3$.
Structure: C$_6$H$_5$—CH$_2$—CH(Br)—CH(Br)—CH$_2$—CH$_3$
(d) 4-Ethyl-1-fluoro-2-nitrobenzene:
- Parent name: benzene $\implies$ benzene ring.
- Substituents (prefixes): 4-ethyl, 1-fluoro, 2-nitro. These are attached to the benzene ring.
Draw benzene ring. Number the carbons starting from a carbon with a substituent. The rule is to give the lowest set of locants to the substituents (1,2,4). If multiple ways give the same set, alphabetical order decides which substituent gets the lowest number (1). Ethyl (E), Fluoro (F), Nitro (N). Alphabetical order: Ethyl, Fluoro, Nitro. This doesn't help directly as they are not on 1, 2, 3 positions.
Let's use the locants directly: Fluorine at C1, Nitro at C2, Ethyl at C4.
Draw benzene ring. Attach -F to C1. Attach -NO$_2$ to C2. Attach -CH$_2$CH$_3$ to C4.
Structure: A benzene ring with a -F at position 1, a -NO$_2$ at position 2, and a -CH$_2$CH$_3$ at position 4.
F
|
C1—C2—NO$_2$
| |
C6 C3
\ /
C5—C4—CH$_2$CH$_3$
Isomerism
Isomerism is the phenomenon where two or more compounds have the same molecular formula but different structures and properties. Such compounds are called **isomers**. Isomerism is broadly classified into structural isomerism and stereoisomerism.
Structural Isomerism
Structural isomers have the **same molecular formula** but differ in the **connectivity** of atoms (how they are linked). Types of structural isomerism:
- **Chain isomerism:** Different carbon skeletons (straight vs branched). Example: C$_5$H$_{12}$ exists as pentane (straight chain), isopentane (2-methylbutane, branched), neopentane (2,2-dimethylpropane, branched).
- **Position isomerism:** Same carbon skeleton and functional group, but the position of the substituent or functional group on the chain or ring is different. Example: C$_3$H$_8$O can be Propan-1-ol (OH on C1) or Propan-2-ol (OH on C2).
- **Functional group isomerism:** Same molecular formula but different functional groups. Example: C$_3$H$_6$O can be Propanal (aldehyde, -CHO) or Propanone (ketone, >C=O).
- **Metamerism:** Arises in compounds with a functional group containing a heteroatom (like ether, ketone, ester) due to different alkyl chains on either side of the functional group. Example: C$_4$H$_{10}$O can be Methoxypropane (CH$_3$OC$_3$H$_7$) or Ethoxyethane (C$_2$H$_5$OC$_2$H$_5$).
Stereoisomerism
Stereoisomers have the **same molecular formula** and the **same connectivity** of atoms, but they differ in the **spatial arrangement** of their atoms or groups. Types of stereoisomerism:
- **Geometrical isomerism:** Occurs in compounds with restricted rotation (like double bonds or rings) where substituents on each side of the restricted rotation are arranged differently in space (cis vs trans).
- **Optical isomerism:** Occurs in compounds with chiral centers (usually a carbon bonded to four different groups), resulting in non-superimposable mirror images (enantiomers) that rotate plane-polarized light in opposite directions.
Fundamental Concepts In Organic Reaction Mechanism
An organic reaction involves a chemical transformation where an organic molecule (the **substrate**) reacts with an **attacking reagent** to form new product(s), often through intermediate species. The step-by-step description of how bonds break and form during a reaction is called the **reaction mechanism**. Understanding mechanisms helps predict reactivity and design synthetic routes.
General reaction: Substrate + Attacking Reagent $\rightarrow$ [Intermediate(s)] $\rightarrow$ Product(s) (+ Byproducts)
Fission Of A Covalent Bond
Covalent bonds can break in two main ways:
- **Heterolytic Cleavage (Heterolysis):** The shared electron pair goes entirely with one of the bonded atoms, forming ions. The atom that takes the electron pair gains a negative charge and has a complete valence shell (octet). The atom that loses the electron pair gains a positive charge and has an incomplete valence shell (sextet).
Example: $\text{CH}_3\text{–Cl} \rightarrow \text{CH}_3^+ \text{ (carbocation)} + \text{Cl}^- \text{ (chloride ion)}$
Species with a positively charged carbon with a sextet are called **carbocations** (primary, secondary, tertiary). They are electron-deficient and reactive. Stability increases with increasing alkyl substitution (methyl < primary < secondary < tertiary) due to inductive and hyperconjugation effects. Carbocations are sp$^2$ hybridised and have a trigonal planar shape. Species with a negatively charged carbon having a valence octet and a lone pair are called **carbanions** (primary, secondary, tertiary). Carbon is typically sp$^3$ hybridised, resulting in a pyramidal shape. They are also reactive. Electron-donating alkyl groups destabilise carbanions (opposite to carbocations). Reactions proceeding via heterolysis are called **ionic, heteropolar, or polar reactions**. - **Homolytic Cleavage (Homolysis):** Each atom involved in the bond takes one electron from the shared pair, forming neutral species with unpaired electrons called **free radicals**. Single electron movement is shown by 'fish hook' curved arrows (half-headed arrows).
Example: $\text{Cl–Cl} \rightarrow \text{Cl} \cdot + \text{Cl} \cdot \text{ (chlorine free radicals)}$
$\text{CH}_3\text{–Br} \rightarrow \text{CH}_3 \cdot \text{ (methyl free radical)} + \text{Br} \cdot \text{ (bromine free radical)}$
Alkyl free radical stability increases with increasing alkyl substitution (methyl < primary < secondary < tertiary) similar to carbocations. Reactions proceeding via homolysis are called **free radical, homopolar, or nonpolar reactions**.
Substrate And Reagent
In an organic reaction, it's often convenient to distinguish between the two reacting species: the **substrate** and the **reagent**. The substrate is typically the organic molecule that provides the carbon skeleton where the reaction occurs. The reagent is the species that attacks the substrate. If both molecules contribute carbon atoms to new bonds, the distinction is arbitrary, and the molecule of focus is called the substrate.
Electron Movement In Organic Reactions
Curved arrows are used to represent the movement of electron pairs or single electrons in organic reaction mechanisms. A full-headed curved arrow ($\curvearrowright$) shows the movement of an electron pair, starting from the source of the electron pair (e.g., a lone pair, a $\pi$ bond, or a $\sigma$ bond) and ending at the atom or bond where the electron pair moves. A half-headed curved arrow ( ) shows the movement of a single electron (as in free radical reactions).
Examples of electron movement with curved arrows:
- Formation of a bond by donation of a lone pair: $\text{Nu:}^- + \text{E}^+ \curvearrowright \text{Nu–E}$
- Breaking a $\pi$ bond: $ \curvearrowright $
- Movement of a lone pair to form a $\pi$ bond: $ \curvearrowright $
Problem 12.11. Using curved-arrow notation, show the formation of reactive intermediates when the following covalent bonds undergo heterolytic cleavage. (a) CH$_3$–SCH$_3$, (b) CH$_3$–CN, (c) CH$_3$–Cu
Answer:
Heterolytic cleavage (heterolysis) involves the bond breaking such that the shared electron pair stays with one of the fragments, forming ions. The arrow starts from the bond and points towards the atom that receives the electron pair.
(a) CH$_3$–SCH$_3$ (Dimethyl sulfide). The C-S bond is covalent. Sulfur is more electronegative than carbon. So, the electron pair goes to Sulfur.
CH$_3$ – SCH$_3$ $\rightarrow$ CH$_3^+$ + : SCH$_3^-$
The curved arrow shows the electron pair from the C-S bond moving to the S atom.
CH$_3$ $\curvearrowright$ SCH$_3$ $\rightarrow$ CH$_3^+$ + SCH$_3^-$
(b) CH$_3$–CN (Acetonitrile). The C–CN bond is covalent. The CN group is electron-withdrawing due to the electronegativity of N and the triple bond polarity. The carbon in the CN group is more electronegative than the methyl carbon. So, the electron pair goes to the CN group.
CH$_3$ – CN $\rightarrow$ CH$_3^+$ + : CN$^-$
The curved arrow shows the electron pair from the C-CN bond moving to the CN group.
CH$_3$ $\curvearrowright$ CN $\rightarrow$ CH$_3^+$ + CN$^-$
(c) CH$_3$–Cu (Methylcopper). The C-Cu bond is covalent. Copper is a metal and is less electronegative than carbon. So, the electron pair goes to Carbon.
CH$_3$ – Cu $\rightarrow$ CH$_3^-$ + Cu$^+$
The curved arrow shows the electron pair from the C-Cu bond moving to the C atom.
CH$_3$ $\curvearrowright$ Cu $\rightarrow$ CH$_3^-$ + Cu$^+$
The reactive intermediates produced are a carbocation (a and b) and a carbanion (c).
Electron Displacement Effects In Covalent Bonds
Electron displacement effects in covalent bonds influence the polarity and reactivity of organic molecules. These can be permanent or temporary.
- **Permanent effects:** Caused by the influence of nearby atoms or groups, even in the absence of a reagent. * **Inductive effect:** Polarization of a $\sigma$ bond due to the presence of an electronegative or electropositive atom or group in the chain. The effect is transmitted along the $\sigma$ bonds but weakens rapidly with distance. Electron-withdrawing groups (-I effect) pull electron density; electron-donating groups (+I effect) push electron density. Halogens, -NO$_2$, -CN, -COOH are typical electron-withdrawing groups. Alkyl groups are considered electron-donating. * **Resonance effect (Mesomeric effect):** Delocalisation of $\pi$ electrons or lone pairs in conjugated systems. It causes a redistribution of electron density and can create partial charges. (+R effect: electron donation away from the substituent into the conjugated system; -R effect: electron withdrawal towards the substituent from the conjugated system). Occurs in systems with alternating single and double bonds, or adjacent lone pairs/unoccupied p orbitals.
- **Temporary effects:** Occur only in the presence of an attacking reagent. * **Electromeric effect (E effect):** Complete transfer of a shared pair of $\pi$ electrons to one of the atoms joined by a multiple bond, triggered by an attacking reagent. It is temporary and is annulled when the reagent is removed. (+E effect: $\pi$ electrons move towards the atom to which the reagent attaches; -E effect: $\pi$ electrons move away from the atom to which the reagent attaches). * **Polarisability effect:** Temporary dipole induced in a molecule by the approach of an attacking reagent.
Inductive Effect
When a $\sigma$ bond connects two atoms of different electronegativity, the electron density shifts towards the more electronegative atom, creating partial positive and negative charges ( bond polarity). This polarity in one $\sigma$ bond can induce polarity in adjacent $\sigma$ bonds, albeit to a lesser extent. This sequential polarization along a carbon chain is the inductive effect.
Example: Chloroethane (CH$_3$CH$_2$Cl). The C–Cl bond is polar ($\text{C}^\delta{^+}–\text{Cl}^\delta{^-}$). The carbon attached to Cl ($\text{C}_1$) becomes partially positive. This $\text{C}_1$ then attracts electron density from the adjacent C–C bond, causing $\text{C}_2$ to become partially positive ($\text{C}_2^{\delta\delta+}$). The inductive effect weakens rapidly with distance.
Substituents are classified by their inductive effect relative to hydrogen:
- **Electron-withdrawing groups (-I effect):** Pull electron density through $\sigma$ bonds (e.g., halogens, -NO$_2$, -CN, -COOH).
- **Electron-donating groups (+I effect):** Push electron density through $\sigma$ bonds (e.g., alkyl groups like -CH$_3$, -CH$_2$CH$_3$).
Problem 12.14. Which bond is more polar in the following pairs of molecules: (a) H$_3$C-H, H$_3$C-Br (b) H$_3$C-NH$_2$, H$_3$C-OH (c) H$_3$C-OH, H$_3$C-SH
Answer:
Bond polarity is determined by the difference in electronegativity between the bonded atoms. A larger electronegativity difference leads to a more polar bond.
(a) H$_3$C-H vs H$_3$C-Br: Compare C-H bond vs C-Br bond. Electronegativity values (approximate): C (2.5), H (2.1), Br (2.8).
C-H: $|2.5 - 2.1| = 0.4$.
C-Br: $|2.5 - 2.8| = 0.3$.
Wait, Br is more electronegative than C. So C-Br bond should be polar with partial negative on Br. The difference is 0.3. H is less electronegative than C. So C-H bond is slightly polar with partial negative on C. The difference is 0.4.
Let's check electronegativity values again. Pauling scale: C=2.55, H=2.20, Br=2.96, N=3.04, O=3.44, S=2.58.
C-H: $|2.55 - 2.20| = 0.35$.
C-Br: $|2.55 - 2.96| = 0.41$.
Using these values, the C-Br bond is more polar than the C-H bond.
Answer for (a): H$_3$C-Br (C-Br bond)
(b) H$_3$C-NH$_2$ vs H$_3$C-OH: Compare C-N bond vs C-O bond. Electronegativity values: N (3.04), O (3.44), C (2.55).
C-N: $|2.55 - 3.04| = 0.49$.
C-O: $|2.55 - 3.44| = 0.89$.
The C-O bond is more polar than the C-N bond.
Answer for (b): H$_3$C-OH (C-O bond)
(c) H$_3$C-OH vs H$_3$C-SH: Compare C-O bond vs C-S bond. Electronegativity values: O (3.44), S (2.58), C (2.55).
C-O: $|2.55 - 3.44| = 0.89$.
C-S: $|2.55 - 2.58| = 0.03$.
The C-O bond is much more polar than the C-S bond.
Answer for (c): H$_3$C-OH (C-O bond)
Problem 12.15. In which C–C bond of CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$Br, the inductive effect is expected to be the least?
Answer:
The inductive effect is the polarization of a $\sigma$ bond caused by the presence of an electronegative or electropositive atom or group elsewhere in the molecule. The effect is transmitted through the $\sigma$ bonds but decreases rapidly with the number of intervening bonds.
The molecule is CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$Br. The electronegative atom causing the inductive effect is Bromine (Br).
Let's number the carbon atoms starting from the one bonded to Br:
C1—C2—C3—Br
The polar C1—Br bond induces polarity in the C1—C2 bond, which in turn induces polarity in the C2—C3 bond.
The inductive effect is strongest in the C1—Br bond itself. It is transmitted to the adjacent C1—C2 bond, but its magnitude is reduced. It is further transmitted to the C2—C3 bond, but its magnitude is reduced even more.
The C—C bonds in the molecule are C1—C2 and C2—C3.
The inductive effect of Br on C1—C2 is stronger than its inductive effect on C2—C3 because there is one more intervening bond between C1 and C2 (via C1) compared to C2 and C3 (via C1 and C2).
The question asks about the inductive effect in the C—C bond where it is least. The inductive effect from Br weakens with distance.
The C1—Br bond has the direct inductive effect source (Br). The effect is transmitted to C1, then to the C1—C2 bond, then to C2, then to the C2—C3 bond, then to C3, then to the C3—CH$_3$ bond (not a C-C bond in the main chain as typically considered in this context, but bonded to the C3). The question asks about C-C bonds within the CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$ chain.
The C1—C2 bond experiences inductive effect from Br (one bond away from C1). The C2—C3 bond experiences inductive effect from Br (two bonds away from C2, via C1).
The inductive effect is weakest in the C—C bond that is furthest away from the electronegative group (Br).
In the chain CH$_3$—CH$_2$—CH$_2$—Br, let's call the carbons C3—C2—C1—Br (numbering from the end opposite to Br). The inductive effect from Br is transmitted through C1, then C2, then C3.
The C1—Br bond is polarised. The C2—C1 bond is polarised by C1's partial positive charge. The C3—C2 bond is polarised by C2's partial positive charge. The inductive effect is weakest in the C3—CH$_3$ bond (the C-C bond involving the CH$_3$ group). However, the question asks about C-C bonds *of* CH$_3$CH$_2$CH$_2$Br.
The C—C bonds are between CH$_3$ and CH$_2$, and between the two CH$_2$ groups.
Let's number from the end opposite to Br: C3—C2—C1—Br.
C3—C2 bond. Inductive effect from Br is transmitted through C1 and C2. Two intervening C atoms.
C2—C1 bond. Inductive effect from Br is transmitted through C1. One intervening C atom.
The inductive effect weakens with the number of $\sigma$ bonds between the substituent and the bond in question. The C3—C2 bond is further from the Br than the C2—C1 bond (3 $\sigma$ bonds from C3 to Br vs 2 $\sigma$ bonds from C2 to Br). Therefore, the inductive effect is least in the C3—C2 bond (the bond between the CH$_3$ and the adjacent CH$_2$).
Resonance Structure
Many organic molecules cannot be adequately represented by a single Lewis structure because of the delocalisation of $\pi$ electrons or lone pairs. The actual structure is a **resonance hybrid** (a weighted average) of two or more contributing Lewis structures called **resonance structures** (or canonical structures). Resonance structures are hypothetical and differ only in the arrangement of electrons, not the positions of nuclei or number of unpaired electrons.
Example: Benzene (C$_6$H$_6$). Its structure with alternating single and double bonds doesn't explain its uniform bond lengths. Benzene is a resonance hybrid of two equivalent Kekulé structures.
The resonance hybrid is more stable than any single contributing structure; the energy difference is the resonance energy. More stable contributing structures contribute more to the hybrid.
Rules for writing resonance structures:
- Same connectivity of atoms.
- Same number of valence electrons and unpaired electrons.
- Arrows show electron movement.
- More stable structures (more covalent bonds, complete octets, less charge separation, negative charge on more electronegative atom) contribute more.
Problem 12.16. Write resonance structures of CH$_3$COO$^–$ and show the movement of electrons by curved arrows.
Answer:
The acetate ion (CH$_3$COO$^-$) is the conjugate base of acetic acid. The negative charge is delocalised over the two oxygen atoms. The structure is CH$_3$—C(═O)—O$^-$ with a lone pair on the negatively charged oxygen and lone pairs on the double-bonded oxygen.
First, draw the Lewis structure, including lone pairs:
O:
//
CH$_3$—C—$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$:
Now, show electron movement using curved arrows to generate resonance structures. A lone pair on the negatively charged oxygen can move to form a $\pi$ bond with the carbon, and the $\pi$ bond in the carbonyl group breaks, with the electron pair moving onto the other oxygen atom.
:O: :$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$:
// |
CH$_3$—C—$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$: $\curvearrowright$ CH$_3$—C=O:
The curved arrow starts from a lone pair on the oxygen on the right and points towards the C-O bond. The other curved arrow starts from the C=O $\pi$ bond and points towards the oxygen on the top.
Let's redraw with clear electron movement:
:O: :$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$:
// |
CH$_3$—C—$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$: $\longleftrightarrow$ CH$_3$—C=O:
$arrow from O^- $ $arrow from \pi$ bond
The movement of electrons gives the second resonance structure:
:$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$: :O:
| //
CH$_3$—C=O: $\longleftrightarrow$ CH$_3$—C—$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$:
The two resonance structures of the acetate ion are equivalent.
Structure I: CH$_3$—C(═O)—O$^-$
Structure II: CH$_3$—C(O$^-$)═O
Showing electron movement:
:O: :$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$:
// $\curvearrowright$ |
CH$_3$—C—$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$: $\longleftrightarrow$ CH$_3$—C=O:
Problem 12.17. Write resonance structures of CH$_2$=CH–CHO. Indicate relative stability of the contributing structures.
Answer:
The compound is propenal (acrolein). It has a conjugated system: a double bond (CH$_2$=CH) conjugated with a carbonyl double bond (CH=O). Delocalisation of $\pi$ electrons can occur.
Draw the Lewis structure, including lone pairs:
H H O:
| | //
H—C=C—C—H
| |
H H
More simply:
CH$_2$=CH–CH=O:
Let's show the movement of $\pi$ electrons and lone pairs using curved arrows.
Movement 1: $\pi$ electrons from C=C move towards the C-C single bond to form a double bond. Simultaneously, the $\pi$ electrons from the C=O double bond move onto the oxygen atom due to oxygen's higher electronegativity.
CH$_2$=CH—CH=O: $\curvearrowright$ CH$_2$—CH=CH—$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$:
This results in a separation of charge:
Structure I (neutral): CH$_2$=CH–CH=O:
Structure II (charged): $\overset{+}{\text{CH}}_2$—CH=CH—$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$$^-$:
Check valencies and octets in Structure II: C1 (CH$_2$) has 3 bonds and +1 charge (sextet). C2 (CH) has 4 bonds (octet). C3 (CH) has 4 bonds (octet). C4 (O) has 1 bond and 3 lone pairs (octet) and -1 charge.
Another possible movement from Structure I: Lone pair on oxygen moves to form a triple bond? No, carbon cannot have 5 bonds.
Only Structure II is a significant resonance contributor involving charge separation in this conjugated system.
Relative Stability of Contributing Structures:
- Structure I is neutral, with complete octets on all atoms except hydrogen.
- Structure II has separation of opposite charges, which requires energy. It also has a carbon atom (C1) with an incomplete octet (sextet).
Structure I (neutral, complete octets on C and O) is significantly more stable and is the major contributor to the resonance hybrid. Structure II (charged, incomplete octet on C) is less stable and is a minor contributor.
Relative stability: **Structure I > Structure II**.
Problem 12.18. Explain why the following two structures, I and II cannot be the major contributors to the real structure of CH$_3$COOCH$_3$. I) II)
Answer:
The molecule is methyl acetate (an ester). Its standard Lewis structure (major contributor) is CH$_3$—C(═O)—O—CH$_3$. Oxygen atoms have lone pairs. Resonance can occur involving the lone pair on the oxygen adjacent to the carbonyl carbon. Let's draw the major contributor (Structure III) and the resonance structure involving electron donation from the ester oxygen (Structure IV).
Major contributor (Structure III):
:O:
//
CH$_3$—C—$\overset{..}{\text{O}}$—CH$_3$
Resonance structure from electron donation from the ester oxygen (Structure IV):
:O$^-$:
|
CH$_3$—C=$\overset{+}{\text{O}}$—CH$_3$
Given structures I and II are:
Structure I: $\overset{-}{\text{CH}}_3$—C(═O)—$\overset{+}{\text{O}}$—CH$_3$
Structure II: CH$_3$—C(═O$^-$)—$\overset{+}{\text{O}}$—CH$_3$
Let's analyse why structures I and II are not major contributors by applying the rules for evaluating resonance structures:
Structure I:
- It involves separation of charge (+ and -). This is less stable than a neutral structure.
- It places a negative charge on a less electronegative atom (Carbon) and a positive charge on a more electronegative atom (Oxygen). Placing negative charge on a less electronegative atom and positive charge on a more electronegative atom is energetically unfavourable and results in very unstable resonance structures.
- It also violates the octet rule for the carbon atom carrying the negative charge (it would have a lone pair and 3 bonds, total 8 electrons, but it's part of a bond to the carbonyl carbon). Let's re-examine how it might be formed. It implies the electron pair from the C—C bond moved to the methyl carbon. This is not a typical or energetically favorable resonance movement in this molecule.
Structure II:
- It involves separation of charge (+ and -). Less stable than a neutral structure.
- It places a positive charge on an oxygen atom bonded to the carbonyl carbon (where it is double bonded). This requires breaking the C=O $\pi$ bond. This would result in the carbonyl carbon having an incomplete octet (sextet), which is highly unstable.
- The structure seems incorrectly drawn. The negative charge is on the oxygen double bonded to carbon. Let's assume it is: CH$_3$—C($\overset{-}{\text{O}}$)—O—CH$_3$, with a single bond between C and the top O, and a positive charge on the other oxygen. This also doesn't follow standard resonance patterns in esters. The standard resonance involves electron donation from the single-bonded oxygen's lone pair to the carbonyl carbon, moving the double bond electrons onto the carbonyl oxygen.
Let's assume the intended Structure II was CH$_3$—C(O$^+$)—O$^-$-CH$_3$. Here both oxygens have a +1 and -1 charge. The carbon is double bonded to the oxygen with a +1 charge. This is also highly unstable and unlikely.
Let's assume the structures I and II are as written in the problem description:
Structure I: $\overset{-}{\text{CH}}_3$—C(═O)—$\overset{+}{\text{O}}$—CH$_3$
Structure II: CH$_3$—C(═O$^-$)—$\overset{+}{\text{O}}$—CH$_3$ (This should be a single bond between C and O if O is negative and C is positive)
Let's assume the provided resonance structures in the problem (I and II) are indeed intended to be resonance structures of CH$_3$COOCH$_3$, even if unusually drawn. The principle to explain why they are not major contributors is based on the rules for resonance structure stability.
Structure I involves charge separation (negative on methyl carbon, positive on the ether oxygen). Placing a negative charge on a carbon less electronegative than oxygen (which is positive) is highly unfavourable.
Structure II (assuming it means CH$_3$—C(single bond)O$^-$—O$^+$—CH$_3$ with double bond elsewhere?) is also highly unstable due to adjacent positive charges on oxygen and carbon (if the bond to O$^-$ is single). The description "C(═O$^-$)" is ambiguous but suggests a double bond to a negative oxygen, which would mean 3 bonds for carbon and a lone pair, resulting in a negative charge on carbon, not oxygen.
Focusing on the typical resonance in esters (III and IV): III is major (neutral, complete octets). IV is minor (charge separation, positive on more electronegative oxygen, but complete octets for all except H). Structure IV is a more reasonable minor contributor than I or II as shown in the problem.
Reason why I and II cannot be major contributors: They involve unfavourable charge separation, specifically placing negative charge on less electronegative atoms (like carbon in I) and/or positive charges on more electronegative atoms (like oxygen in I and II) in a way that is energetically much less favourable than neutral structures or structures placing negative charge on the most electronegative atom.
Resonance Effect
The resonance effect (also called the mesomeric effect) is the polarity induced in a conjugated system by the delocalisation of $\pi$ electrons or lone pairs. It's a permanent effect. It's classified as:
- **Positive Resonance Effect (+R or +M):** Electron-donating effect. Groups with lone pairs adjacent to a $\pi$ system donate electrons into the system (e.g., -OH, -OR, -NH$_2$, halogens). Electron density increases at certain positions in the conjugated system.
- **Negative Resonance Effect (-R or -M):** Electron-withdrawing effect. Groups with multiple bonds or positive charges adjacent to a $\pi$ system withdraw electrons from the system (e.g., -NO$_2$, -CN, -CHO, -COOH). Electron density decreases at certain positions.
Conjugated systems (alternating single and double bonds) are key to resonance. Resonance/Mesomeric effect is important in explaining reactivity and stability of conjugated compounds.
Electromeric Effect (E effect)
The electromeric effect is a **temporary** effect that occurs in compounds with multiple bonds when attacked by a reagent. It involves the complete transfer of a shared pair of $\pi$ electrons to one of the atoms involved in the multiple bond.
- **+E effect:** The $\pi$ electrons move towards the atom bonded to the attacking reagent. Typically occurs in addition reactions of alkenes/alkynes with electrophiles. Example: Addition of H$^+$ to ethene: $\text{CH}_2=\text{CH}_2 + \text{H}^+ \rightarrow \overset{+}{\text{CH}}_2-\overset{\curvearrowright}{\text{CH}_2}$ (Incorrect arrow, should be $\pi$ electrons moving to carbon bonded to H$^+$). Correct: $\text{CH}_2=\text{CH}_2 + \text{H}^+ \curvearrowright \overset{+}{\text{CH}}_2-\text{CH}_3$.
- **-E effect:** The $\pi$ electrons move away from the atom bonded to the attacking reagent. Typically occurs in addition reactions of carbonyl compounds with nucleophiles. Example: Addition of CN$^-$ to carbonyl: $ >\overset{\curvearrowright}{\text{C}}=\text{O} + \text{Nu}^- \curvearrowright >\overset{-}{\text{C}}-\text{O}^-$.
Electromeric effect predominates over the inductive effect when they oppose each other.
Hyperconjugation
Hyperconjugation is a **permanent** stabilising effect involving the delocalisation of $\sigma$ electrons of a C–H bond (in an alkyl group) into an adjacent empty p orbital or a $\pi$ system (double bond, benzene ring, positive charge). It is also called "no-bond resonance".
Example: Ethyl cation ($\text{CH}_3\overset{+}{\text{C}}\text{H}_2$). A C–H $\sigma$ bond of the methyl group can align with the empty p orbital on the positively charged carbon. The $\sigma$ electrons delocalise into the empty p orbital, helping to disperse the positive charge and stabilise the carbocation.
More alkyl groups attached to the positively charged carbon mean more C–H bonds available for hyperconjugation, leading to greater stabilisation. Stability of carbocations increases with increasing hyperconjugation (methyl < primary < secondary < tertiary).
Hyperconjugation also stabilises alkenes (delocalisation of $\sigma$ electrons into the adjacent $\pi$ system) and alkylarenes (delocalisation of $\sigma$ electrons into the adjacent aromatic $\pi$ system).
In alkenes, more alkyl substituents on the double bond lead to greater hyperconjugation and higher stability.
Problem 12.19. Explain why (CH$_3$)$_3$C$^+$ is more stable than CH$_3$CH$_2^+$ and CH$_3^+$ is the least stable cation.
Answer:
The stability of carbocations is influenced by inductive effects (+I from alkyl groups) and hyperconjugation. Both effects help to disperse the positive charge on the carbon atom, making the ion more stable.
(CH$_3$)$_3$C$^+$ (tert-butyl cation): The positively charged carbon is bonded to three methyl groups. Each methyl group (-CH$_3$) has three C-H $\sigma$ bonds whose electrons can delocalise into the adjacent empty p orbital on the positively charged carbon through hyperconjugation. There are a total of 3 $\times$ 3 = 9 such C-H $\sigma$ bonds. The three alkyl groups also exert a +I effect, pushing electron density towards the positive carbon.
CH$_3$CH$_2^+$ (ethyl cation): The positively charged carbon is bonded to one methyl group (-CH$_3$). This methyl group has three C-H $\sigma$ bonds available for hyperconjugation. The methyl group also exerts a +I effect.
CH$_3^+$ (methyl cation): The positively charged carbon is not bonded to any alkyl groups. It has no C-H $\sigma$ bonds adjacent to the empty p orbital that can participate in hyperconjugation. It also lacks the +I effect from alkyl groups.
Comparing the extent of stabilization:
- (CH$_3$)$_3$C$^+$ has the maximum number of C-H bonds (9) available for hyperconjugation and the strongest +I effect from three alkyl groups, leading to the greatest dispersal of positive charge.
- CH$_3$CH$_2^+$ has 3 C-H bonds available for hyperconjugation and the +I effect from one alkyl group, leading to less dispersal of positive charge than in the tertiary cation.
- CH$_3^+$ has no C-H bonds for hyperconjugation and no +I effect from alkyl groups. Its empty p orbital is perpendicular to its C-H bonds (which are sp$^2$ hybridized) and cannot effectively overlap with them.
Therefore, the order of stability of these carbocations is determined by the number of alkyl groups and the resulting extent of hyperconjugation and inductive effects:
(CH$_3$)$_3$C$^+$ > CH$_3$CH$_2^+$ > CH$_3^+$
(Tertiary > Primary > Methyl)
(CH$_3$)$_3$C$^+$ is the most stable because it has the highest number of hyperconjugative structures (due to 9 $\alpha$-hydrogens) and the strongest +I effect from three methyl groups, effectively spreading the positive charge. CH$_3^+$ is the least stable because it lacks both hyperconjugation and +I effect from alkyl groups.
Types Of Organic Reactions And Mechanisms
Organic reactions are broadly classified based on how the connectivity of atoms changes. The main types are:
- **Substitution reactions:** An atom or group in a molecule is replaced by another atom or group.
- **Addition reactions:** Atoms or groups are added across a multiple bond (double or triple). The multiple bond is converted to a single bond or a double bond.
- **Elimination reactions:** Atoms or groups are removed from adjacent carbons, typically resulting in the formation of a multiple bond.
- **Rearrangement reactions:** Atoms or groups within a molecule rearrange to form a structural isomer.
Each type of reaction proceeds through a specific mechanism involving intermediates and electron movements.
Methods Of Purification Of Organic Compounds
Organic compounds obtained from natural sources or synthesized in the laboratory often contain impurities. Various purification techniques are used to obtain pure compounds, based on differences in physical properties between the compound and the impurities.
Common methods:
- **Sublimation:** Used for solids that change directly from solid to vapour upon heating (sublimable solids) to separate them from non-sublimable impurities.
- **Crystallisation:** Most common method for purifying solid organic compounds. Based on differences in solubility of the compound and impurities in a suitable solvent. Impure solid is dissolved in a hot solvent, filtered to remove insoluble impurities, and the solution is cooled to crystallise the pure compound. Coloured impurities are removed by activated charcoal.
- **Distillation:** Used to separate volatile liquids from non-volatile impurities or liquids with significant differences in boiling points. Liquid is heated to vaporise, vapour is condensed and collected.
- **Fractional Distillation:** Used when boiling points are close. Vapours pass through a fractionating column, allowing repeated vaporisation and condensation steps, enriching the vapour in the lower boiling component at each stage.
- **Distillation under reduced pressure:** Used for liquids with very high boiling points or those that decompose upon heating at atmospheric pressure. Pressure is reduced, lowering the boiling point.
- **Steam Distillation:** Used for steam-volatile compounds that are immiscible with water. Steam is passed through the liquid, the mixture of steam and compound vapours is condensed, and the organic compound is separated from water (often using a separating funnel). The liquid boils below its normal boiling point because the total vapour pressure (liquid + water) equals atmospheric pressure.
- **Differential Extraction:** Used to separate an organic compound from an aqueous solution by shaking with an immiscible organic solvent where the compound is more soluble. The organic layer is separated and the solvent removed. Continuous extraction is used for less soluble compounds.
- **Chromatography:** Powerful technique for separation, purification, and purity testing. Based on differential distribution of components between a stationary phase and a mobile phase.
- **Adsorption Chromatography:** Separation based on differential adsorption on a solid stationary phase (adsorbent like silica gel or alumina). * **Column Chromatography:** Separation in a column packed with adsorbent. Different components are eluted at different rates. * **Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC):** Separation on a thin layer of adsorbent coated on a plate. Components separate as spots based on their retardation factor (Rf value).
- **Partition Chromatography:** Separation based on differential partitioning between a stationary liquid phase (often water trapped on paper) and a mobile solvent phase. * **Paper Chromatography:** A common type of partition chromatography using special paper.
- Nitrogen: $\text{Na} + \text{C} + \text{N} \rightarrow \text{NaCN}$ (Sodium cyanide)
- Sulphur: $\text{2Na} + \text{S} \rightarrow \text{Na}_2\text{S}$ (Sodium sulfide)
- Halogen (X=Cl, Br, I): $\text{Na} + \text{X} \rightarrow \text{NaX}$ (Sodium halide)
- Nitrogen and Sulphur: $\text{Na} + \text{C} + \text{N} + \text{S} \rightarrow \text{NaSCN}$ (Sodium thiocyanate)
- Test for Nitrogen: Sodium fusion extract + $\text{FeSO}_4$ solution + Acidification with concentrated $\text{H}_2\text{SO}_4$. Formation of **Prussian blue** colour confirms nitrogen. ($\text{CN}^- + \text{Fe}^{2+} \rightarrow [\text{Fe(CN)}_6]^{4-}$, then $\text{Fe}^{3+} + [\text{Fe(CN)}_6]^{4-} \rightarrow \text{Fe}_4[\text{Fe(CN)}_6]_3$, Prussian blue).
- Test for Sulphur: * Extract + Acetic acid + Lead acetate solution. **Black precipitate** (PbS) confirms sulfur. ($\text{S}^{2-} + \text{Pb}^{2+} \rightarrow \text{PbS} \downarrow$) * Extract + Sodium nitroprusside solution. **Violet colouration** confirms sulfur. ($\text{S}^{2-} + [\text{Fe(CN)}_5\text{NO}]^{2-} \rightarrow [\text{Fe(CN)}_5\text{NOS}]^{4-}$) If N and S are both present, NaSCN forms. Tests are done to avoid interference (e.g., boil extract with $\text{HNO}_3$ before halogen test).
- Test for Halogens: Extract + Nitric acid + Silver nitrate solution. **White precipitate** (AgCl) soluble in $\text{NH}_4\text{OH}$ (aq) $\implies$ Chlorine. **Yellowish precipitate** (AgBr) sparingly soluble in $\text{NH}_4\text{OH}$ (aq) $\implies$ Bromine. **Yellow precipitate** (AgI) insoluble in $\text{NH}_4\text{OH}$ (aq) $\implies$ Iodine. ($\text{X}^- + \text{Ag}^+ \rightarrow \text{AgX} \downarrow$). Extract must be boiled with concentrated HNO$_3$ before test if N or S are present to decompose NaCN or Na$_2$S.
- Test for Phosphorus: Heat compound with an oxidising agent (like $\text{Na}_2\text{O}_2$) to oxidise P to phosphate ($\text{PO}_4^{3-}$). Boil with $\text{HNO}_3$. Add ammonium molybdate solution. **Yellow colouration or precipitate** indicates phosphorus. ($\text{PO}_4^{3-} + \text{Ammonium Molybdate} \rightarrow \text{Ammonium phosphomolybdate}$)
- **Dumas method:** Compound heated with CuO in $\text{CO}_2$ atmosphere $\rightarrow$ free N$_2$. $\text{N}_2$ collected over KOH solution (absorbs $\text{CO}_2$). Volume of $\text{N}_2$ measured at STP. Percentage calculated from $\text{N}_2$ volume. Not applicable for compounds with N in nitro, azo, or ring systems.
- **Kjeldahl's method:** Compound heated with concentrated $\text{H}_2\text{SO}_4 \rightarrow$ ammonium sulfate. Heated with excess NaOH $\rightarrow$ $\text{NH}_3$ gas. $\text{NH}_3$ absorbed in known volume of standard acid (e.g., $\text{H}_2\text{SO}_4$). Unreacted acid titrated with standard alkali. Amount of acid consumed $\rightarrow$ amount of $\text{NH}_3 \rightarrow$ amount of N. Not applicable for compounds with N in nitro, azo, or ring systems.
Types of Chromatography:
Purity is checked by melting/boiling points or chromatographic/spectroscopic methods.
Qualitative Analysis Of Organic Compounds
Qualitative analysis determines the elements present in an organic compound. Organic compounds always contain carbon and hydrogen. They may also contain oxygen, nitrogen, sulphur, halogens, and phosphorus.
Detection Of Carbon And Hydrogen
Detected by heating the organic compound with copper(II) oxide. Carbon is oxidised to CO$_2$ (tested with lime water, which turns turbid: $\text{CO}_2 + \text{Ca(OH)}_2 \rightarrow \text{CaCO}_3 \downarrow + \text{H}_2\text{O}$). Hydrogen is oxidised to H$_2$O (tested with anhydrous copper sulfate, which turns blue: $\text{5H}_2\text{O} + \text{CuSO}_4 \rightarrow \text{CuSO}_4 \cdot \text{5H}_2\text{O}$).
Detection Of Other Elements
Nitrogen, sulphur, halogens, and phosphorus are detected by converting them to ionic forms by fusing the organic compound with metallic sodium ("Lassaigne's test").
Na fusion reactions:
The fused mass is extracted with water to get the **sodium fusion extract** (containing NaCN, Na$_2$S, NaX, NaSCN etc., depending on the elements present). Tests are performed on this extract.
Quantitative Analysis
Quantitative analysis determines the mass percentage of each element in an organic compound, essential for empirical and molecular formula determination.
Carbon And Hydrogen
Estimated simultaneously by combustion (Liebig's method). Known mass of compound burnt in excess oxygen and CuO. C $\rightarrow$ CO$_2$, H $\rightarrow$ H$_2$O. Produced H$_2$O is absorbed in weighed $\text{CaCl}_2$ tube, CO$_2$ in weighed KOH solution tube. Increase in mass of tubes corresponds to mass of H$_2$O and CO$_2$ formed.
Percentage of C = $\frac{\text{Mass of } \text{CO}_2 \times 12.011}{\text{Molar mass of } \text{CO}_2 \times \text{Mass of compound}} \times 100$. Molar mass CO$_2$ $\approx 44.011$. Using atomic mass 12 for C, Molar mass CO$_2$ = 44.
Percentage of C = $\frac{\text{Mass of } \text{CO}_2 \times 12}{\text{44} \times \text{Mass of compound}} \times 100$.
Percentage of H = $\frac{\text{Mass of } \text{H}_2\text{O} \times 2.016}{\text{Molar mass of } \text{H}_2\text{O} \times \text{Mass of compound}} \times 100$. Molar mass H$_2$O $\approx 18.015$. Using atomic mass 1 for H, Molar mass H$_2$O = 18.
Percentage of H = $\frac{\text{Mass of } \text{H}_2\text{O} \times 2}{\text{18} \times \text{Mass of compound}} \times 100$.
Problem 12.20. On complete combustion, 0.246 g of an organic compound gave 0.198g of carbon dioxide and 0.1014g of water. Determine the percentage composition of carbon and hydrogen in the compound.
Answer:
Given: Mass of organic compound = 0.246 g. Mass of CO$_2$ produced = 0.198 g. Mass of H$_2$O produced = 0.1014 g.
Percentage of carbon = $\frac{\text{Mass of C in } \text{CO}_2}{\text{Mass of compound}} \times 100\%$.
Mass of C in 0.198 g CO$_2$: Molar mass of C = 12.011 g/mol. Molar mass of CO$_2$ = 44.009 g/mol. (Using 12 and 44 as in formula derivation).
Mass of C = $\frac{12}{44} \times \text{Mass of } \text{CO}_2 = \frac{12}{44} \times 0.198 \text{ g} \approx 0.054 \text{ g}$.
Percentage of carbon = $\frac{0.054 \text{ g}}{0.246 \text{ g}} \times 100\% \approx 21.95\%$. (Text matches)
Percentage of hydrogen = $\frac{\text{Mass of H in } \text{H}_2\text{O}}{\text{Mass of compound}} \times 100\%$.
Mass of H in 0.1014 g H$_2$O: Molar mass of H = 1.008 g/mol. Molar mass of H$_2$O = 18.015 g/mol. (Using 2 and 18 as in formula derivation).
Mass of H = $\frac{2}{18} \times \text{Mass of } \text{H}_2\text{O} = \frac{2}{18} \times 0.1014 \text{ g} \approx 0.011267 \text{ g}$.
Percentage of hydrogen = $\frac{0.011267 \text{ g}}{0.246 \text{ g}} \times 100\% \approx 4.58\%$. (Text matches)
The percentage composition is approximately **21.95% carbon** and **4.58% hydrogen**.
Nitrogen
Two methods: Dumas method and Kjeldahl's method.
Problem 12.21. In Dumas’ method for estimation of nitrogen, 0.3g of an organic compound gave 50mL of nitrogen collected at 300K temperature and 715mm pressure. Calculate the percentage composition of nitrogen in the compound. (Aqueous tension at 300K=15 mm)
Answer:
Given: Mass of organic compound = 0.3 g. Volume of $\text{N}_2$ collected = 50 mL. Temperature $T = 300$ K. Pressure $p_{\text{Total}} = 715$ mm Hg. Aqueous tension at 300K = 15 mm Hg.
First, calculate the pressure of dry nitrogen gas: $p_{\text{N}_2} = p_{\text{Total}} - \text{Aqueous tension} = 715 \text{ mm Hg} - 15 \text{ mm Hg} = 700$ mm Hg.
Now, convert the volume of $\text{N}_2$ collected under these conditions to volume at STP (273.15 K and 760 mm Hg).
Using the combined gas law: $\frac{p_1V_1}{T_1} = \frac{p_{STP}V_{STP}}{T_{STP}}$.
$\frac{(700 \text{ mm Hg})(50 \text{ mL})}{300 \text{ K}} = \frac{(760 \text{ mm Hg})V_{STP}}{273.15 \text{ K}}$.
$V_{STP} = \frac{(700)(50)(273.15)}{(300)(760)} \text{ mL}$. Using 273 K for STP temperature as in text example:
$V_{STP} = \frac{(700)(50)(273)}{(300)(760)} \text{ mL} = \frac{9555000}{228000} \text{ mL} \approx 41.907$ mL. (Text gets 41.9 mL)
At STP, 1 mole of $\text{N}_2$ gas (28.014 g) occupies 22.414 L (or 22414 mL). (Using 28 g and 22400 mL as in text example).
22400 mL of $\text{N}_2$ at STP weighs 28 g.
So, 41.9 mL of $\text{N}_2$ at STP weighs $\frac{28 \text{ g}}{22400 \text{ mL}} \times 41.9 \text{ mL}$.
Mass of nitrogen = $\frac{28 \times 41.9}{22400} \text{ g} \approx 0.052375$ g.
Percentage of nitrogen = $\frac{\text{Mass of nitrogen}}{\text{Mass of organic compound}} \times 100\%$.
Percentage of nitrogen = $\frac{0.052375 \text{ g}}{0.3 \text{ g}} \times 100\% \approx 17.458\%$.
Rounding to two decimal places:
Percentage of nitrogen $\approx 17.46\%$. (Text matches)
The percentage composition of nitrogen in the compound is approximately **17.46%**.
Halogens
Estimated by **Carius method**. Known mass of compound heated in Carius tube with fuming $\text{HNO}_3$ and $\text{AgNO}_3$. Halogen $\rightarrow$ AgX precipitate (AgCl white, AgBr pale yellow, AgI yellow). Precipitate filtered, dried, weighed. Percentage calculated from mass of AgX.
Percentage of halogen = $\frac{\text{Mass of AgX}}{\text{Molar mass of AgX}} \times \frac{\text{Atomic mass of halogen}}{\text{Mass of organic compound}} \times 100$.
Problem 12.23. In Carius method of estimation of halogen, 0.15 g of an organic compound gave 0.12 g of AgBr. Find out the percentage of bromine in the compound.
Answer:
Given: Mass of organic compound = 0.15 g. Mass of AgBr obtained = 0.12 g.
We need to find the percentage of bromine (Br) in the compound.
Molar mass of AgBr = Atomic mass of Ag + Atomic mass of Br. (Using approximate atomic masses: Ag = 107.87, Br = 79.904. Using 108 and 80 as in text example).
Molar mass of AgBr = 108 + 80 = 188 g/mol.
188 g of AgBr contains 80 g of Br.
Mass of Br in 0.12 g of AgBr = $\frac{80 \text{ g Br}}{188 \text{ g AgBr}} \times 0.12 \text{ g AgBr}$.
Mass of Br = $\frac{80 \times 0.12}{188} \text{ g} = \frac{9.6}{188} \text{ g} \approx 0.051064$ g.
Percentage of bromine = $\frac{\text{Mass of bromine}}{\text{Mass of organic compound}} \times 100\%$.
Percentage of bromine = $\frac{0.051064 \text{ g}}{0.15 \text{ g}} \times 100\% \approx 34.042\%$.
Rounding to two decimal places:
Percentage of bromine $\approx 34.04\%$. (Text matches)
The percentage of bromine in the compound is approximately **34.04%**.
Sulphur
Estimated by **Carius method**. Compound heated with $\text{Na}_2\text{O}_2$ or fuming $\text{HNO}_3 \rightarrow$ S oxidised to $\text{H}_2\text{SO}_4$. $\text{H}_2\text{SO}_4$ precipitated as $\text{BaSO}_4$ by adding $\text{BaCl}_2$ solution. $\text{BaSO}_4$ filtered, dried, weighed. Percentage calculated from mass of $\text{BaSO}_4$.
Percentage of S = $\frac{\text{Mass of } \text{BaSO}_4}{\text{Molar mass of } \text{BaSO}_4} \times \frac{\text{Atomic mass of S}}{\text{Mass of organic compound}} \times 100$. Molar mass BaSO$_4 \approx 233.38$ (137.33 + 32.06 + 4*16.00). Atomic mass S $\approx 32.06$. Using 233 and 32 as in text example).
Percentage of S = $\frac{\text{Mass of } \text{BaSO}_4 \times 32}{\text{233} \times \text{Mass of organic compound}} \times 100$.
Problem 12.24. In sulphur estimation, 0.157 g of an organic compound gave 0.4813 g of barium sulphate. What is the percentage of sulphur in the compound?
Answer:
Given: Mass of organic compound = 0.157 g. Mass of barium sulphate (BaSO$_4$) obtained = 0.4813 g.
We need to find the percentage of sulphur (S) in the compound.
Molar mass of BaSO$_4$ = Atomic mass of Ba + Atomic mass of S + 4 $\times$ Atomic mass of O. (Using approximate atomic masses: Ba = 137, S = 32, O = 16).
Molar mass of BaSO$_4$ = 137 + 32 + 4(16) = 137 + 32 + 64 = 233 g/mol. (Text uses 233)
233 g of BaSO$_4$ contains 32 g of S.
Mass of S in 0.4813 g of BaSO$_4$ = $\frac{32 \text{ g S}}{233 \text{ g BaSO}_4} \times 0.4813 \text{ g BaSO}_4$.
Mass of S = $\frac{32 \times 0.4813}{233} \text{ g} \approx \frac{15.3996}{233} \text{ g} \approx 0.06609$ g.
Percentage of sulphur = $\frac{\text{Mass of sulphur}}{\text{Mass of organic compound}} \times 100\%$.
Percentage of sulphur = $\frac{0.06609 \text{ g}}{0.157 \text{ g}} \times 100\% \approx 42.0955\%$.
Rounding to two decimal places:
Percentage of sulphur $\approx 42.10\%$. (Text matches)
The percentage of sulphur in the given compound is approximately **42.10%**.
Phosphorus
Estimated by oxidising P to phosphoric acid ($\text{H}_3\text{PO}_4$). $\text{H}_3\text{PO}_4$ precipitated as ammonium phosphomolybdate or $\text{MgNH}_4\text{PO}_4$. $\text{MgNH}_4\text{PO}_4$ on ignition gives $\text{Mg}_2\text{P}_2\text{O}_7$. Percentage calculated from mass of precipitate.
Percentage of P = $\frac{\text{Mass of precipitate}}{\text{Molar mass of precipitate}} \times \frac{\text{Mass of P (or P2) in precipitate}}{\text{Mass of organic compound}} \times 100$.
Oxygen
Percentage of oxygen is usually determined by difference: 100% - (sum of percentages of all other elements).
Alternatively, oxygen can be estimated directly: Compound decomposed in $\text{N}_2$ stream $\rightarrow$ oxygen converted to CO over hot coke $\rightarrow$ CO oxidised to $\text{CO}_2$ over $\text{I}_2\text{O}_5$ $\rightarrow$ $\text{CO}_2$ measured. Mass of $\text{CO}_2$ $\rightarrow$ mass of CO $\rightarrow$ mass of $\text{O}_2$.
Modern CHN elemental analysers determine C, H, and N simultaneously using combustion followed by detection of $\text{CO}_2$, H$_2$O, and $\text{N}_2$. Oxygen is usually determined by difference or sometimes directly by pyrolysis. These methods use very small sample quantities.
Exercises
Question 12.1 What are hybridisation states of each carbon atom in the following compounds ?
$CH_2=C=O, CH_3CH=CH_2, (CH_3)_2CO, CH_2=CHCN, C_6H_6$
Answer:
Question 12.2 Indicate the $\sigma$ and $\pi$ bonds in the following molecules :
$C_6H_6, C_6H_{12}, CH_2Cl_2, CH_2=C=CH_2, CH_3NO_2, HCONHCH_3$
Answer:
Question 12.3 Write bond line formulas for : Isopropyl alcohol, 2,3-Dimethylbutanal, Heptan-4-one.
Answer:
Question 12.4 Give the IUPAC names of the following compounds :
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f) $Cl_2CHCH_2OH$
Answer:
Question 12.5 Which of the following represents the correct IUPAC name for the compounds concerned ?
(a) 2,2-Dimethylpentane or 2-Dimethylpentane
(b) 2,4,7-Trimethyloctane or 2,5,7-Trimethyloctane
(c) 2-Chloro-4-methylpentane or 4-Chloro-2-methylpentane
(d) But-3-yn-1-ol or But-4-ol-1-yne.
Answer:
Question 12.6 Draw formulas for the first five members of each homologous series beginning with the following compounds.
(a) H–COOH
(b) $CH_3COCH_3$
(c) H–CH=$CH_2$
Answer:
Question 12.7 Give condensed and bond line structural formulas and identify the functional group(s) present, if any, for :
(a) 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
(b) 2-Hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylic acid
(c) Hexanedial
Answer:
Question 12.8 Identify the functional groups in the following compounds
(a)
(b)
(c)
Answer:
Question 12.9 Which of the two: $O_2NCH_2CH_2O^–$ or $CH_3CH_2O^–$ is expected to be more stable and why ?
Answer:
Question 12.10 Explain why alkyl groups act as electron donors when attached to a $\pi$ system.
Answer:
Question 12.11 Draw the resonance structures for the following compounds. Show the electron shift using curved-arrow notation.
(a) $C_6H_5OH$
(b) $C_6H_5NO_2$
(c) $CH_3CH=CHCHO$
(d) $C_6H_5–CHO$
(e) $C_6H_5–CH_2^+$
(f) $CH_3CH=CHCH_2^+$
Answer:
Question 12.12 What are electrophiles and nucleophiles ? Explain with examples.
Answer:
Question 12.13 Identify the reagents shown in bold in the following equations as nucleophiles or electrophiles:
(a) $CH_3COOH + \mathbf{HO^–} \rightarrow CH_3COO^− + H_2O$
(b) $CH_3COCH_3 + \mathbf{CN^–} \rightarrow (CH_3)_2C(CN)(OH)$
(c) $C_6H_6 + \mathbf{CH_3CO^+} \rightarrow C_6H_5COCH_3$
Answer:
Question 12.14 Classify the following reactions in one of the reaction type studied in this unit.
(a) $CH_3CH_2Br + HS^− \rightarrow CH_3CH_2SH + Br^−$
(b) $(CH_3)_2C=CH_2 + HCl \rightarrow (CH_3)_2C(Cl)CH_3$
(c) $CH_3CH_2Br + HO^− \rightarrow CH_2=CH_2 + H_2O + Br^−$
(d) $(CH_3)_3CCH_2OH + HBr \rightarrow (CH_3)_2C(Br)CH_2CH_3 + H_2O$
Answer:
Question 12.15 What is the relationship between the members of following pairs of structures ? Are they structural or geometrical isomers or resonance contributors ?
(a)
(b)
(c)
Answer:
Question 12.16 For the following bond cleavages, use curved-arrows to show the electron flow and classify each as homolysis or heterolysis. Identify reactive intermediate produced as free radical, carbocation and carbanion.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Answer:
Question 12.17 Explain the terms Inductive and Electromeric effects. Which electron displacement effect explains the following correct orders of acidity of the carboxylic acids?
(a) $Cl_3CCOOH > Cl_2CHCOOH > ClCH_2COOH$
(b) $CH_3CH_2COOH > (CH_3)_2CHCOOH > (CH_3)_3C.COOH$
Answer:
Question 12.18 Give a brief description of the principles of the following techniques taking an example in each case.
(a) Crystallisation
(b) Distillation
(c) Chromatography
Answer:
Question 12.19 Describe the method, which can be used to separate two compounds with different solubilities in a solvent S.
Answer:
Question 12.20 What is the difference between distillation, distillation under reduced pressure and steam distillation ?
Answer:
Question 12.21 Discuss the chemistry of Lassaigne’s test.
Answer:
Question 12.22 Differentiate between the principle of estimation of nitrogen in an organic compound by (i) Dumas method and (ii) Kjeldahl’s method.
Answer:
Question 12.23 Discuss the principle of estimation of halogens, sulphur and phosphorus present in an organic compound.
Answer:
Question 12.24 Explain the principle of paper chromatography.
Answer:
Question 12.25 Why is nitric acid added to sodium extract before adding silver nitrate for testing halogens?
Answer:
Question 12.26 Explain the reason for the fusion of an organic compound with metallic sodium for testing nitrogen, sulphur and halogens.
Answer:
Question 12.27 Name a suitable technique of separation of the components from a mixture of calcium sulphate and camphor.
Answer:
Question 12.28 Explain, why an organic liquid vaporises at a temperature below its boiling point in its steam distillation ?
Answer:
Question 12.29 Will $CCl_4$ give white precipitate of AgCl on heating it with silver nitrate? Give reason for your answer.
Answer:
Question 12.30 Why is a solution of potassium hydroxide used to absorb carbon dioxide evolved during the estimation of carbon present in an organic compound?
Answer:
Question 12.31 Why is it necessary to use acetic acid and not sulphuric acid for acidification of sodium extract for testing sulphur by lead acetate test?
Answer:
Question 12.32 An organic compound contains 69% carbon and 4.8% hydrogen, the remainder being oxygen. Calculate the masses of carbon dioxide and water produced when 0.20 g of this substance is subjected to complete combustion.
Answer:
Question 12.33 A sample of 0.50 g of an organic compound was treated according to Kjeldahl’s method. The ammonia evolved was absorbed in 50 ml of 0.5 M $H_2SO_4$. The residual acid required 60 mL of 0.5 M solution of NaOH for neutralisation. Find the percentage composition of nitrogen in the compound.
Answer:
Question 12.34 0.3780 g of an organic chloro compound gave 0.5740 g of silver chloride in Carius estimation. Calculate the percentage of chlorine present in the compound.
Answer:
Question 12.35 In the estimation of sulphur by Carius method, 0.468 g of an organic sulphur compound afforded 0.668 g of barium sulphate. Find out the percentage of sulphur in the given compound.
Answer:
Question 12.36 In the organic compound $CH_2 = CH – CH_2 – CH_2 – C \equiv CH$, the pair of hydridised orbitals involved in the formation of: $C_2 – C_3$ bond is:
(a) $sp – sp^2$
(b) $sp – sp^3$
(c) $sp^2 – sp^3$
(d) $sp^3 – sp^3$
Answer:
Question 12.37 In the Lassaigne’s test for nitrogen in an organic compound, the Prussian blue colour is obtained due to the formation of:
(a) $Na_4[Fe(CN)_6]$
(b) $Fe_4[Fe(CN)_6]_3$
(c) $Fe_2[Fe(CN)_6]$
(d) $Fe_3[Fe(CN)_6]_4$
Answer:
Question 12.38 Which of the following carbocation is most stable ?
(a) $(CH_3)_3C-CH_2^+$
(b) $(CH_3)_3C^+$
(c) $CH_3CH_2CH_2^+$
(d) $CH_3\stackrel{+}{C}HCH_2CH_3$
Answer:
Question 12.39 The best and latest technique for isolation, purification and separation of organic compounds is:
(a) Crystallisation
(b) Distillation
(c) Sublimation
(d) Chromatography
Answer:
Question 12.40 The reaction:
$CH_3CH_2I + KOH(aq) \rightarrow CH_3CH_2OH + KI$
is classified as :
(a) electrophilic substitution
(b) nucleophilic substitution
(c) elimination
(d) addition
Answer: